Skip to main content

Votebank politics behind Tamil Nadu govt inquiry into Anna varsity VC's 'activities'

By NS Venkataraman*

It is sad and depressing that the vice chancellor of the Anna University in Tamil Nadu has become a victim of Tamil Nadu politics. Recently, the state government  ordered an inquiry about his activities. Justifiably, several teachers of the Anna University have protested against the state government move to appoint an inquiry committee to investigate “the misdeeds” of the vice chancellor, who has said that he has nothing to conceal. Given his background and track record, one would tend to agree with him.
Senior professors and teachers working in the Anna University support the vice chancellor, Dr MK Surappa, and the students have regard for him. All those associated with the Anna University in close quarters say that there has been no nepotism in administration of the university.
But some politicians in Tamil Nadu, who thrive in the name of propagating Tamil language, seem to have their own agenda.
It is widely felt that the Anna University vice chancellor has excellent credentials. He has been selected for the post by the Tamil Nadu governor (chancellor of the Anna University) on the basis of recommendation made by a duly constituted selection committee.
From day one of Dr MK Surappa assuming office as vice chancellor, some politicians in Tamil Nadu, who get large space in the print and visual media in the state, have been saying that only a Tamilian should be the vice chancellor of the Anna University. What a ridiculous argument!
There are several professors and teachers from Tamil Nadu who are working in top positions in foreign universities and outside Tamil Nadu in India. In the sphere of education, merit should be the criteria for selection and not caste or nativity. It is not as if some of the Tamil Nadu politicians, who swear against the vice chancellor, do not know this but their agenda is self-centred and they have been striving on a hate campaign for the last several decades and misleading the poor and innocent people to catch their votes.
Certainly, more than interest in education, votebank politics is their priority.
Earlier, the Tamil Nadu government took steps to split the Anna University into two and change the name of one of the two universities to be created. Several professors and students have protested against the move but nobody in the Tamil Nadu government cared to listen to their voice.
The justification advanced by the Tamil Nadu government to split the Anna University into two was to declare one of the universities to be declared as centre of excellence and thus get huge funds from the Central government. Vice chancellor Surappa had the courage of conviction to say that attracting funds should not be the criteria for splitting the university and such required funds to augment the facilities can be well obtained from other credible sources.
From day one, some politicians, who get large space in print and visual media, have been saying that only a Tamilian should be VC
The Tamil Nadu government objected to the statement terming it as unwarranted. What is unwarranted about this? Who will speak for the Anna University if not the vice chancellor and it is his legitimate right to express his voice. Why object to this?
Vice chancellor Dr MK Surappa
For several years now, there have been consistent rumours that vice chancellors in Tamil Nadu universities are being appointed by politicians in power based on receiving some considerations. Further, it is rumoured that politicians in power in Tamil Nadu in the last several decades, whichever may be the party in power, expect that the vice chancellors should be obliged to the politicians in power and do their biddings.
This is one of the main reasons why the standard of education in Tamil Nadu has considerably gone down in recent years, which is no secret. Mixing education and politics in Tamil Nadu has now become complete.
Further, one question that remains unanswered is whether the Tamil Nadu government has taken the permission of the chancellor of Anna University (the Tamil Nadu governor) before ordering an inquiry on Dr MK Surappa.
Why is the chancellor keeping quiet? Does he approve this inquiry by Tamil Nadu government? Should he not assert his authority as the chancellor of the Anna University, if he would disagree with the decision of Tamil Nadu government to order an inquiry?
Former students of the Anna University, now well spread all over the world, present and former professors and present-day students, feel disgusted and frustrated about the interference of politicians in the affairs of the university.
But, obviously, hate mongering Tamil Nadu politicians seem to have their own agenda and the voice of the teachers and students do not seem to be of concern to them.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for The Deprived

Comments

Anonymous said…
I totally agree with the article. Education requires long term vision. Higher educational institutions should be especially free from political interference. Sadly most political leaders and parties lack this vision in Tamil Nadu today. Anna University has been among the best state owned universities in India and almost on par with IITs and NITs. That's the reason why the central government chose to confer the status of an Institute of Eminence, only one of two technological universities chosen for this honour. However Tamil Nadu politicians of all sides behave like illiterates and try to deny the university, its students and faculty this honour. Recently the state government rejected the honour and reprimanded the vice chancellor for speaking out on this issue. It is plain fact that Tamil Nadu politicians did not like Prof Surappa as VC of the University as he was a non-Tamil, which is absurd as merit alone should dictate such high positions.However, the petty minded politicians would have none of it. They tried to discredit the VC from day 1 by hook or crook. The latest corruption allegation against the VC is their new tactic. The politicians have secured support of some sycophants and cacaphants against the respected VC amongst the staff,for which there is no shortage in Tamil Nadu.Can Tamil Nadu politicians stoop any lower?
Anonymous said…
On the dot. It is disturbing to see the State apparatus seeking to silence or disable the VC, as he had the “audacity” to act independently like writing to the Centre on his own about being able to generate funds from internal sources. This retaliatory action of the government seems vengeful, at any rate avoidable. The VC, as one could surmise from newspaper reports, apparently has been striving for excellence to improve the reputation of the University he heads. While it is widely believed, that he would come clean, the aftertaste the episode would leave is one which would, in future, discourage eminent professionals from associating themselves with this University for fear of meeting with a similar fate for actions taken in the best interest of the institution. One hopes that vested interests in running the State’s education system, have not had a role. R.Sundararaman
Vijay said…
Appointment of Surappa who wasn't in the recommended lost of the state government and overreaches of the governor are to be blamed. He awas facing many allegations of curruption against him in awarding contracts etc. This is a absurd claim that the Tamilnadu government is blamed. Govennor is the one to be blamed for his overzealous activities in handling appointment and happenings thereafter at the Anna University.

TRENDING

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

US 'frustrated' with India’s discomfort: Maritime exercise in South China Sea

By Vijay Prashad*  In early April 2024, the navies of four countries -- Australia, Japan, the Philippines, and the United States -- held a maritime exercise in the South China Sea. Australia’s Warramunga, Japan’s Akebono, the Philippines’ Antonio Luna, and the United States’ Mobile worked together in these waters to strengthen their joint abilities and -- as they said in a joint statement  -- to “uphold the right to freedom of navigation and overflight and respect for maritime rights under international law.” 

Dadi, poti discuss 'injustice' under 10 yr Modi rule: Video campaign goes viral

By Our Representative  Watan Ki Raah Mein, a civil society campaign of the Samvidhan Bachao Nagrik Abhiyan, has released a short video conversation on social media of an exchange of letters between a dadi and her poti discussing poverty, unemployment, corruption and women’s safety. The letters also raise the question of  suppression of our fundamental rights of speech, expression and justice. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9.