Skip to main content

No reduction in bank charges, State Bank of India continues to 'fleece' citizens

Counterview Desk
The Financial Accountability Network (FAN), India, a collective of civil society organisations, unions, people’s movements and concerned citizens to raise the issue of accountability and transparency of the national financial institutions, in a public statement has said in a public statement that media reporting on bank charges is misleading, pointing out, State Bank of India (SBI) "continues to fleece its customers."

Text:

There has been misleading media reports, which claimed that SBI has revised various services charges. The reports claimed that there has been a reduction in minimum balance required to maintain monthly, reduction in penalty for not maintaining minimum balance and restrictions on number of cash transactions allowed at the bank branches.
A close scrutiny of documents reveals that there have not been any reductions that are being claimed in the media. The only change in charges by SBI has been reducing of the SMS alert service charges from Rs 15/month to Rs 12/month, and the removal of service charges for online National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) and Real-time Gross Settlement Transaction (RGST).
The latter was done after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) waived off the charges levied by them for NEFT and RTGS transactions. The last few weeks, SBI, in fact, has included charges for the newly introduced services like Rupee Prepaid Cards.
SBI’s latest notification of revised service charges, which will be applicable from October 1, 2019 does not mentioned changes in existing charges. At a time when there is a strong demand from the people to reduce the bank charges, media reports like these are not ust misleading but irresponsible.

Monthly minimum balance

SBI started penalizing its saving account holders for not maintaining prescribed minimum balance in April 2017. Later in October 2017, the bank reduced the minimum amount to maintain monthly and penalty for not maintaining the same in the saving accounts. Again, in April 2018, bank further reduced the penalty for not maintaining the monthly minimum balance. The list changes made can be seen in the table.
The two-time reduction in penalty within 12 months happened after much criticism the bank got from its customers and media. Between April-November 2017, SBI earned more money through penalizing the customers for not maintaining minimum balance then its own profit from second quarter of the same year. SBI earned Rs 1,771 crore in eight months by charging people, while their July – September quarter net profit was Rs 1, 581.55 crore.
In the new notification issued by SBI, there is no reduction in both – the minimum monthly balance requirement and the penalty for not maintaining it.

Service charges for Immediate Payment Service (IMPS) and RTGS transactions

After waiving off the charges for NEFT and RTGS transactions by RBI in June 2019, the commercial banks were also asked to pass the benefit to the customers. SBI revised charges for NEFT and RTGS in August 2019. It reduced the charges for online NEFT & RTGS to NIL and for same transactions at bank branches which can be seen in the table below. 
As of now, not all the banks have transferred the benefit of reduction in NEFT and RTGS charges by RBI and they continue to charge as per their board approved service charges.

Deposit and withdrawal limits and charges beyond allowed number of free transactions

As per SBI notification (with effect from April 2017) which is still available on its website: Saving account holders with Rs 25,000 or below as the minimum balance in previous month, can have 3 cash deposits and 2 cash withdrawals from bank branch. Thereafter the bank is charging Rs 50 per transaction for cash deposit as well as cash withdrawal.
We would like to reiterate that the service charges are nothing but transferring the loss made due to corporate bad loans on to the people. Hence, we demand the RBI and the banks to remove all charges that are burdening the people.

Comments

TRENDING

Did Modi promote Dholavira, a UNESCO site now, as Gujarat CM? Facts don't tally

By Rajiv Shah  As would generally happen, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet – that not only was he “absolutely delighted” with the news of UNESCO tag to Dholavira, but he “ first visited ” the site during his “student days and was mesmerised by the place” – is being doubted by his detractors. None of the two tweets, strangely, even recalls once that it’s a Harappan site in Gujarat.

Labelling a Jesuit a Marxist? It's like saying if you use a plane, you become American

Jesuits: Cedric Prakash, Stan Swamy By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* A thirteen- fourteen-year-old has many dreams! That's an impressionable age; at the cusp of finishing school. It is also a time when one tastes a different kind of freedom: to go for camps with boys of your own age (not with ones family). Such camps and outings were always enjoyed to the hilt. The ones, however, which still remain etched in my memory are the mission camps to the Jesuit missions in Maharashtra and Gujarat.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Giant conglomerates 'favoured': Whither tribal rights for jal-jungle-jameen?

Prafull Samantara By Mohammad Irshad Ansari*  The struggle for “Jal, Jungle and Jameen” has been a long-drawn battle for the tribal communities of India. This tussle was once again in the limelight with the proposed diamond mining in the Buxwaha forest of Chhatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). The only difference in this movement was the massive social media support it gained, which actually seems to tilt the scale for the tribal people in a long time.

If not Modi, then who? Why? I (an ordinary citizen) am there! Main hoon naa!

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The number of women ministers is doubled in early July from the first term after cabinet reshuffle by the present government led by Narendra Modi. While there were 06 women ministers in the previous term, this term there are 11. The previous two governments led by Dr Manmohan Singh had 10 women ministers in each tenure. Are these number of women ministers something to rejoice in the near 75 years of independence? Yes maybe, if we think that things are slowly improving in the patriarchal system. This change is less likely to achieve gender balance in the parliament otherwise we require more than 11 as per the 33% reservation . This change is also less likely because the men politicians’ inability to handle the country’s mess is becoming more and more evident and especially during the corona crisis. Seems, the addition of more women ministers may be a result of the recent assembly elections where women played a decisive role in the election results. For example

Effluent discharge into deep sea? Modi told to 'reconsider' Rs 2275 crore Gujarat project

Counterview Desk  In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, well-known Gujarat-based environmentalist, Mahesh Pandya of the Paryavaran Mitra, has protested against the manner in with the Gujarat government is continuing with its deep sea effluent disposal project despite environmental concerns.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Gujarat govt gender insensitive? Cyclone package for fisherfolk 'ignores' poor women

By Our Representative A memorandum submitted to the Gujarat government by various fisherfolk associations of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat under the leadership of Ahmedabad NGO Centre for Social Justice's senior activist Arvind Khuman, who is based in Amreli, has suggested that the relief package offered to the fishermen affected by the Tauktae cyclone is not only inadequate, it is also gender insensitive.

Debt bondage, forced labour, sexual abuse in Gujarat's Bt cottonseed farms: Dutch study

By Rajiv Shah  A just-released study, sponsored by a Netherlands-based non-profit, Arisa , “Seeds of Oppression Wage sharecropping in Bt cottonseed production in Gujarat, India”, has said that a new form of bondage, or forced labour, exists in North India’s Bt cottonseed farms, in which bhagiyas, or wage sharecroppers, are employed against advances and are then often required to work for years together “without regular payment of wages.”

Covid: We failed to stop religious, political events, admits Modi-dharmacharya meet

Counterview Desk An email alert sent by one the 11 participants, Prof Salim Engineer, on behalf of the Dharmik Jan Morcha regarding their "religious leaders' online meet" with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, even as offering "support to meet challenges of Corona pandemic", blames religious congregations, though without naming the Maha Kumbh and other religious events, which apparently were instrumental in the spread of the second wave.