Skip to main content

Banks merger: Govt deciding things outside Parliament, it's being made 'redundant'

By Devidas Tuljapurakar
Nirmala Sitharaman, Minister of Finance, in her recent press conference, announced the merger of 10 Public Sector Banks (PSBs) to carve out four big banks. In the process six, PSBs are being closed. Presently the government is going through a syndrome of 5 trillion-dollar economy, and all their acts aim at achieving it.
The government, while pushing this agenda, is not prepared to accept the crude reality that the economy is in crisis. This also leads to the most inconvenient question: who is responsible for the present state of affairs? It is obvious that this is the manifestation of wrong policy prescriptions since 2014.
At this hour of the crisis, there is a need to stabilise the economy. However, the latest announcement by the Finance Minister suggests that the government itself is leading us to instability. This will result in suspending the operations of those ten banks spread out across the borders in the entire nation. In case of merger of associate banks with the State Bank of India (SBI), in the process of consolidation, SBI has lost the business of associate banks.
SBI suppressed this fact by manoeuvring quarter ending data. In case of merger of Dena and Vijaya Bank with Bank of Baroda, same was steered by most able corporate leader meticulously. While steering merger, all issues such as cultural, emotional etc. were handled delicately by respecting the entity which is being merged.
All the issues were addressed professionally but with a positive frame of mind. Thus, Bank of Baroda, in the process of merger, did not lose the business. This was exceptional and looking to the present leadership in those banks cannot be expected to repeat.
All those mergers are neither at the instance of customers, who in the market economy are said to be the king nor by the shareholders or board of directors of the respective banks. Employees and officers have opposed it. This means all those mergers are driven solely by the government. 
This has been done so to carve out big banks to cater to the requirement of big corporates who presently are routing through consortia for their credit requirements which it may facilitate them to avail from one bank.
This means mergers are to facilitate big corporates who are the root cause for today’s crisis in banking. As stated by the RBI in the "Financial Stability Report", of the total credit, 55 per cent goes to big corporates, of which 87 per cent is non-performing assets (NPAs). This speaks volumes on the government’s intentions.
In case of merger of associate banks; consequently, more than 1000 branches were closed and now in case of merger of Dena and Vijaya with Bank of Baroda around 500 branches are being closed. Now again a minimum of 2,000 branches are likely to be closed. 
Common people are being marginalised. They are being pushed outside banking and development
On the one hand, the government wants to implement Jan Dhan. The government claims that they have opened more than 45 crore savings Bank accounts. In the implementation of all flagship programmes of this government such as MUDRA, Atal Pension, Jivan Suraksha and all other insurance schemes for underprivileged sections of society, Direct Benefit Transfers meant for underprivileged etc. banking has a crucial role which can be served by opening more and more outlets and certainly not by closing it. Thus the government is pushing self-defeating propositions.
In the process of merger of banks large scale closure of branches is taking place and this space is being made available to new generation private sector banks, Payment banks and small finance banks in the private sector. Post reforms, in the last two decades, PSBs have lost market share of about 20 per cent, which means they have lost the business of about Rs 35 lakh crore.
On the one hand, successive governments are attempting to privatise PSBs, and since they are unable to do so, they are privatising the business. Maybe now this government with an absolute majority in Lok Sabha and a majority in Rajya Sabha may do it. 
Precisely this is the danger which is looming large on the Indian financial sector. The present political dispensation is one the which opposed nationalisation of banks in 1969 and now they may attempt to do so to fulfil their agenda on the lines of the abolition of Article 370 in the Constitution.
The changes in finance are being decided outside Parliament. The Lok Sabha is being made redundant in the decision-making process. This is the irony of the situation. Judiciary is averse to touch the subjects in the name of the policy. In the process, a mockery of democracy has been made. The Constitution’s Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are meant only for the academic discussions on TV shows.
In the process, the common people are being marginalised. They are being pushed outside banking and development. This is likely to lead for not only economic but social imbalances as well. Does it mean that we are inviting anarchy? Only time will tell. But rest assured we have a strong home minister, more strong then prime minister. Both of them individually and severely are capable of taking care of us.
---
Source: Centre for Financial Accountability

Comments

kumar gautam said…
I am unable to understand that one side govt as well as RBI is in view to provide 1banking system for every 2000 people/5km peripheral.at another side it is involved in mega merger.At employee side ,it can easily be assessed that every deprived employee can't give the best without the satisfaction workplace.where we may think it through several HRM theory(Marlow,Hertzberg or XYZ).Another side the main problem in my personal view is divination of thought process where we may start dailoug with our own house/bank or make sure to spread it in whole banking system.In any survey it is easily seen that bankers are working more than regulated hours but they are not getting anything just now in several time.
Just we have a news for releasing 1.7 lakh crore by RBI for economy.
Is it not the fund indirectly created by our banks.Still we are so productive but we get aleays several disheartening news
In form of society hurdles and nuisance with bankers as well wage and other facilities.
We must think"how we could express our works done in past and what I did get till date ""
Anonymous said…
We need to evolve a new Ownership & Mmgt Structure for PSU Banks. Mere amalgamation while allowing scale and reducing costs, will not deliver much.
For namesake only,today PSU Banks are Board managed with Directors having no stake.รพ

TRENDING

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Church in India 'seems to have lost' moral compass of unequivocal support to the poor

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
In 2017, Pope Francis dedicated a special day, to be observed by the Universal Church, every year, as the ‘World Day of the Poor’. This year it will be observed on November 17 on the theme ‘The hope of the poor shall not perish for ever’; in a message for the day Pope Francis says:

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

As fear 'grips' right liberals, Arvind Panagariya, too, would be declared anti-national?

By Rajiv Shah
It is surely well-known by now that India's top people in the power-that-be have been castigating all those who disagree with them as "anti-nationals". Nothing unusual. If till yesterday only "secular liberals", and "left-liberals" were declared anti-national, facts, however, appear to have begun surfacing that, now, guns are being trained against those who could be qualified as right liberals, too. Let me be specific.

'First time' since 1970s poverty up 10%, consumer spending down 4%: GoI survey

By Our Representative
In what may prove to be a major embarrassment for the Government of India (GoI), a new official survey, carried out in 207-18, has reportedly said that average consumer spending in India fell by more than 4% the previous six years "primarily driven by slackening rural demand." The survey, "Key Indicators: Household Consumer Expenditure in India”, carried out by the National Statistical Office (NSO), says that money spent per person in a month fell by 3.7% from Rs 1,501 in 2011-12 to Rs 1,446 in 2017-18.

National award winning film 'Hellaro' co-produced by three chartered accountants

By Our Representative
“Hellaro”, a Gujarati feature film produced by Saarthi Productions in association with Harfanmaula Films (Ahmedabad) was declared as the Best Feature Film at the National Film Awards which was conferred by the Government of India. The film also won the Special Jury Award for the Best Actress to all the 13 actresses of the film.
Ashish Patel produced the movie, which has been co-produced three co-producers, Aayush Patel, Prateek Gupta and Mit Jani, all of whom, interestingly, started their filmmaking journey after becoming Chartered Accountants in 2012.
“Hellaro” is directed by Abhishek Shah, who has been working in Gujarati theatre since the past 17 years as writer, director and actor and has received numerous awards for his plays. He has also worked as a casting director for 12 films.
“Hellaro” is a period drama based in Kutch and has been co-written by Abhishek Shah and Prateek Gupta. Gupta previously received the Best Debut Director Award, along with Mit Jan…