Skip to main content

NGT imbroglio: Downstream people "to approach" a non-existent Narmada Tribunal?

By Shawahiq Siddiqui*
It was a sad Republic Day for the poor and vulnerable communities in the downstream of the Narmada Basin as their plea for protecting their fundamental and legal right to water and environment covered under right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution goes unheard by the National Green Tribunal (NGT). Ironically, this comes almost on the eve of Republic Day when we embark upon celebrating the adoption of the Constitution of India that champions the protection of life and liberty as cornerstones of fundamental rights.
The alarming environmental deterioration in the 157 km river stretch including the Narmada Estuary caused due to insufficient downstream flows below the Sardar Sarovar Dam in Gujarat was brought to notice of the country’s Green Court by the Bharuch based Narmada Pradusan Nivaran Samiti (NPNS) and the Bharuch Citizen Council. While the Tribunal admitted the matter more than six months ago, it precluded itself from hearing the case on merits.
In the Tribunal’s understanding since the Narmada Tribunal still exists (perhaps it’s referring to the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal that ceased to exist as per the Award of 1979 itself), all the violations of existing environmental laws and inadequacy of the downstream flows can be looked into by the Narmada Tribunal. The NGT while passing the Order has also acknowledged that in addition to the Narmada Tribunal, there is a Narmada Control Authority but recommended to approach the “Tribunal” instead, that no longer exists.

Not as the first step

NGT was not approached as the first step in view of a series of environmental violations that have occurred in the downstream of Narmada Basin over a period of many years. For more than two years numerous representations have been filed to all the authorities concerned with the Sardar Sarovar Dam that control the water and flows in the Narmada Basin.
A plethora of letters and interdepartmental communications that have been doing rounds on the issue of serious environmental impacts of negligible flows from the Sardar Sarovar Dam had been placed on record before the NGT. All the concerned departments including the Narmada Control Authority mandated for implementing environmental safeguard measures in the entire Narmada Basin, the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited which is responsible for regulating the downstream flows and the Government of Gujarat have acknowledged that they were approached by the NPNS on the issue of downstream flows on earlier occasions.
These agencies have also admitted that issues with respect to the severe impacts of negligible flows in the downstream exist and inadequacy of existing flow of 600 cusecs as highlighted vociferously in the media, VIP references, and numerous representations received from downstream communities is in their knowledge.
Taking cognizance of the alarming situation a senior official of the Gujarat Government emphatically recommended to the Narmada Control Authority that an immediate release of 1,500 cusecs for downstream use shall be provisioned till the permanent solution for ensuring adequate flows could be arrived at. Several other letters have been written by the Member of the NCA itself to SSNL.
These admitted violations and official recommendations over a period of two years formed part of the record before the NGT. However, NGT ordered that all the aspects of the matter brought before it be placed before and decided by the Narmada Tribunal, a non-existent entity.

Where do people go now?

The NGT has asked the impacted people to approach a forum that ceased to exist four decades ago soon after it delivered the Narmada Award in 1979. Even if the Narmada Tribunal trusted by the NGT was to exist, it could not have been able to provide any relief to the downstream cause of the River as it did not have the requisite mandate for addressing the grievances related to the environmental violations and downstream flow.
The inter-state water dispute tribunals in the case of Narmada was constituted by the central government based on references made by the state of Gujarat on the issues of equitable sharing of Narmada waters among the riparian states. The Narmada Tribunal did not have any mandate on adjudication of environmental issues. Nor does the Award that it delivered have any environmental protection mechanism – a shortcoming that has been highlighted by the UK based hydrological expert agency in its Report that has been accepted by the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited.
At the same time the Narmada Award of 1979 does provide that the states are free to allocate waters from within their shares and Government of Gujarat may release water for downstream use and even provides that the such flows for the downstream are to be released through the turbines.
What is pertinent is that the Award of 1979 created the machinery namely the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) which was amplified to include various sub-groups including the sub-group on Environment Protection to look into environmental issues in the entire Narmada Basin that would arise in future due to impoundment of river Narmada.
It is the NCA that has miserably failed to protect the downstream environment pari passu as was required by the Prime Minister’s conditional Environmental Clearance and as per the Narmada Scheme. The NGT’s Order relegates the downstream communities to the same agencies whose inaction has resulted in the violation of valuable right to environment of downstream communities.
But now the difficult question before the poor downstream communities is where should they go as per the directions of the Tribunal since the forum it directs them towards no longer exist? And if we could listen to voice of Narmada, as it ceases to speak now without flows, who should the river go to when the regime instituted to protect it, namely the NCA and the other state agencies have failed to discharge their statutory obligations and since the country’s top Green Court established on the mainstreamed principles of international environmental law has ordered its cause to be taken to agencies that either are non-existent or are liable themselves of the state of the dead and dried up Narmada in the downstream.
---
*Environmental lawyer based in New Delhi. Views are personal and do not reflect the views of any institution or agency. Contact: Shawahiq.ielo@gmail.com

Comments

Unknown said…
Surprised!!! Our natural resources, ownerless, and wonder here & there like national citizen of countrt

TRENDING

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

Poser to Modi: Why is Gujarat not fulfilling Constitutional obligations to minorities?

Counterview Desk
In an open letter, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee (MCC), a Gujarat-based civil rights organization, has accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi on infringing upon MCC activists’ constitutional right to protest. Nafees says, they had no other demands except that the Gujarat government should move towards fulfilling the constitutional obligations towards minorities and international treaties to which India is a signatory.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.