Skip to main content

NGT imbroglio: Downstream people "to approach" a non-existent Narmada Tribunal?

By Shawahiq Siddiqui*
It was a sad Republic Day for the poor and vulnerable communities in the downstream of the Narmada Basin as their plea for protecting their fundamental and legal right to water and environment covered under right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution goes unheard by the National Green Tribunal (NGT). Ironically, this comes almost on the eve of Republic Day when we embark upon celebrating the adoption of the Constitution of India that champions the protection of life and liberty as cornerstones of fundamental rights.
The alarming environmental deterioration in the 157 km river stretch including the Narmada Estuary caused due to insufficient downstream flows below the Sardar Sarovar Dam in Gujarat was brought to notice of the country’s Green Court by the Bharuch based Narmada Pradusan Nivaran Samiti (NPNS) and the Bharuch Citizen Council. While the Tribunal admitted the matter more than six months ago, it precluded itself from hearing the case on merits.
In the Tribunal’s understanding since the Narmada Tribunal still exists (perhaps it’s referring to the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal that ceased to exist as per the Award of 1979 itself), all the violations of existing environmental laws and inadequacy of the downstream flows can be looked into by the Narmada Tribunal. The NGT while passing the Order has also acknowledged that in addition to the Narmada Tribunal, there is a Narmada Control Authority but recommended to approach the “Tribunal” instead, that no longer exists.

Not as the first step

NGT was not approached as the first step in view of a series of environmental violations that have occurred in the downstream of Narmada Basin over a period of many years. For more than two years numerous representations have been filed to all the authorities concerned with the Sardar Sarovar Dam that control the water and flows in the Narmada Basin.
A plethora of letters and interdepartmental communications that have been doing rounds on the issue of serious environmental impacts of negligible flows from the Sardar Sarovar Dam had been placed on record before the NGT. All the concerned departments including the Narmada Control Authority mandated for implementing environmental safeguard measures in the entire Narmada Basin, the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited which is responsible for regulating the downstream flows and the Government of Gujarat have acknowledged that they were approached by the NPNS on the issue of downstream flows on earlier occasions.
These agencies have also admitted that issues with respect to the severe impacts of negligible flows in the downstream exist and inadequacy of existing flow of 600 cusecs as highlighted vociferously in the media, VIP references, and numerous representations received from downstream communities is in their knowledge.
Taking cognizance of the alarming situation a senior official of the Gujarat Government emphatically recommended to the Narmada Control Authority that an immediate release of 1,500 cusecs for downstream use shall be provisioned till the permanent solution for ensuring adequate flows could be arrived at. Several other letters have been written by the Member of the NCA itself to SSNL.
These admitted violations and official recommendations over a period of two years formed part of the record before the NGT. However, NGT ordered that all the aspects of the matter brought before it be placed before and decided by the Narmada Tribunal, a non-existent entity.

Where do people go now?

The NGT has asked the impacted people to approach a forum that ceased to exist four decades ago soon after it delivered the Narmada Award in 1979. Even if the Narmada Tribunal trusted by the NGT was to exist, it could not have been able to provide any relief to the downstream cause of the River as it did not have the requisite mandate for addressing the grievances related to the environmental violations and downstream flow.
The inter-state water dispute tribunals in the case of Narmada was constituted by the central government based on references made by the state of Gujarat on the issues of equitable sharing of Narmada waters among the riparian states. The Narmada Tribunal did not have any mandate on adjudication of environmental issues. Nor does the Award that it delivered have any environmental protection mechanism – a shortcoming that has been highlighted by the UK based hydrological expert agency in its Report that has been accepted by the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited.
At the same time the Narmada Award of 1979 does provide that the states are free to allocate waters from within their shares and Government of Gujarat may release water for downstream use and even provides that the such flows for the downstream are to be released through the turbines.
What is pertinent is that the Award of 1979 created the machinery namely the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) which was amplified to include various sub-groups including the sub-group on Environment Protection to look into environmental issues in the entire Narmada Basin that would arise in future due to impoundment of river Narmada.
It is the NCA that has miserably failed to protect the downstream environment pari passu as was required by the Prime Minister’s conditional Environmental Clearance and as per the Narmada Scheme. The NGT’s Order relegates the downstream communities to the same agencies whose inaction has resulted in the violation of valuable right to environment of downstream communities.
But now the difficult question before the poor downstream communities is where should they go as per the directions of the Tribunal since the forum it directs them towards no longer exist? And if we could listen to voice of Narmada, as it ceases to speak now without flows, who should the river go to when the regime instituted to protect it, namely the NCA and the other state agencies have failed to discharge their statutory obligations and since the country’s top Green Court established on the mainstreamed principles of international environmental law has ordered its cause to be taken to agencies that either are non-existent or are liable themselves of the state of the dead and dried up Narmada in the downstream.
---
*Environmental lawyer based in New Delhi. Views are personal and do not reflect the views of any institution or agency. Contact: Shawahiq.ielo@gmail.com

Comments

Unknown said…
Surprised!!! Our natural resources, ownerless, and wonder here & there like national citizen of countrt

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Now, top Gujarat "litterateur" close to Modi says: Godse was patriot, so was Gandhi

By Rajiv Shah
A little over a week after Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticized BJP candidate from Bhopal Pragya Thakur for calling Nathuram Godse a patriot saying he would never forgive her for the remark, a top Sangh Parivar ideologue, known to close to Modi in Gujarat, has supported her, saying her statement should be seen “within a context.” Thakur won from Bhopal by more than 3.5 lakh votes defeating her nearest rival, veteran Congressman and ex-Madhya Pradesh chief minister Digvijay Singh.

Opposition refuses to legally challenge EVMs amidst plans of "back to ballot" protest

Counterview Desk
Even as opposition to the use of electronic voting machines (EVMs) allegedly to rig polls is growing, a group of prominent citizens who have come together to form the EVM Virodhi Rashtriya Jan Andolan has controversially called for a national protest against EVMs on May 30, demanding future elections should be held only on ballot paper.

When a Pak scribe said Modi has 'proved' Jinnah’s two nation theory right...

By Zafar Agha*
It was around nine in the morning on May 24, 2019, a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi stormed the Lok Sabha with 300-plus MPs. It was a call from a journalist friend, Muzamal Suhrawardy, from Lahore, Pakistan. I ignored the call. We liberals had a depressing day the previous evening as the opposition to Modi and BJP collapsed. The results belied reports from the ground and even assessments made by colleagues.

It's now official: Akshay Kumar has not been conferred honorary Canadian citizenship

By Our Representative
It is now official. Super-star Akshay Kumar has not been conferred any honorary citizenship by Canadian authorities, as claimed by him ahead of the 2019 elections. In reply to a query by Roshan Shah, who is a Canadian citizen living in Waterloo, Ontario, and belongs to Ahmedabad, the country’s authorities dealing with issues related with immigration, refugees and citizenship in Canada have said that only six persons have so far been granted honorary citizenship.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad "declared support" to two-nation theory in 1937, followed by Jinnah three years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

If EC's credibility is under question, shouldn't one "assume" EVMs might be tampered?

Counterview Desk
Gauhar Raza, scientist, documentary film maker and poet; senior human rights activist Shabnam Hashmi of the Act Now for Harmony and Democracy (ANHAD); military veteran Major Priyadarshi Chowdhury (retd); and Sucheta De and Sandeep Saurav of the All India Students' Association (AISA), have asked “individuals, organisations and people's movements” to send their endorsement to an appeal they have prepared on Electronic Voting Machine (EVM).

Govt of India overestimated GDP by 2.5%, must restore reputational damage: Ex-CEA

By Rajiv Shah
Top economist Arvind Subramanian has said that changes brought about by the Government of India in data sources and methodology for estimating the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) since 2011-12 “has led to a significant overestimation of growth”. While official estimates place annual average GDP growth between 2011-12 and 2016-17 at about 7 percent, the actual growth may have been 4½ percent, ranging from 3 ½ to 5 ½ percent during the period, he adds.

Common thread of Modi, political Hinduism, nationalism? 'Contest' of ideas isn't over

By Salman Khurshid*
Losing the 2019 election and that too in a somewhat extreme manner has confronted us with unexpected challenges: Our leadership has naturally taken it very hard and to heart but with suggested options that we cannot imagine or contemplate. Hopefully the emotions will settle soon and give us the direction to pick up the pieces and march again.

Will minorities in India be 2nd class citizens? Wake up call: Be a 'communicating' Church

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
India today is at a defining moment of her history. There is so much that has taken place in the past five years (and particularly in the last ten days)- that several citizens of the country are genuinely concerned about the future of the country! Will democracy survive? Will key elements of the Constitution be changed?