Skip to main content

"Pity", film Accidental Prime Minister ignores book's 80% defence of Manmohan Singh: Sanjaya Baru

Sanjaya Baru
By A Representative
Former media adviser to ex-PM Manmohan Singh, Sanjaya Baru, has claimed that 80 per cent of his book "The Accidental Prime Minister" constitutes "the best available defence in print, even as of now, of the Manmohan Singh prime ministership", regretting, it is a " pity" that the film based on it, starring Anupam Kher and Akshaye Khanna, ignores this huge portion.
In an article in "The Week" titled "Have you read the book?", Baru says, underlines, "The book would have read like a hagiography, an unrelenting paean to the former prime minister, if it had not also contained the 20 per cent of criticism." However, he says, both media and the film which bears the same name as the book, focus on its "controversial parts, rather than the totality of a complex argument".
Directly commenting on the film, Baru underlines, "Now with the book being adapted into a movie, chances are that a larger body of opinion about the book is going to be shaped by what the movie’s producers have claimed to be a ‘fictionalised’ dramatisation of the book. A pity." He adds, "Controversy may help sales, but it prevents a reasonable view being taken of a nuanced argument."
Ironically, Baru blames such a reaction to his book on the way the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) reacted to his book. He says, "I had alerted the PM and his office to the fact that while the book is, by and large, a defence of Singh’s tenure, the media would focus on the critical comments. That is what happened."
Noting that "the PMO’s knee-jerk response and the media’s focus on the book’s controversial parts, rather than the totality of a complex argument, have shaped thinking about the book both among its critics and most admirers", finding himself "at the receiving end of ill-informed public criticism, especially on social media, where the critics have clearly not read the book."

Comments

  1. Leo SaldanhaJanuary 24, 2019

    But then, Baru permitted adaption of his book into a film after studying the script I hope. If not, he appears to have played into the hands of the Sangh, knowingly. And now that the film has bombed at the box office, he is probably doing his vain best to claim redemption?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You want to have the cake and then eat it too !! It is not about 80% and 20%, but you wanted it all, sir!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor*  Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

Garba on the tarmac and other lessons in tourist arrogance

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat    A video of a group of Indian tourists, reportedly from Gujarat, performing Garba on the airport tarmac in Vietnam has gone viral on social media. The group, consisting of men and women, was seen dancing in front of their aircraft, making considerable noise, ignoring instructions from airport staff, and disrupting the boarding process for other passengers. The incident triggered widespread criticism online. Many viewers expressed outrage and began recalling similar episodes in which Indian tourists have displayed a disregard for local norms, civic behaviour, and public etiquette while travelling abroad.

​Ideological shifts and structural realities within India's left-wing insurgency

​By Harsh Thakor*  The Maoist insurgency in India is arguably at its weakest point since the formation of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004. Years of sustained counterinsurgency operations, leadership losses, shrinking territorial influence, declining recruitment, and growing technological advantages enjoyed by the state have significantly eroded the movement's operational capabilities.