Skip to main content

How Govt of India "violated" Supreme Court ruling: Information Commission vacancies

Chief Information Commissioner Sudhir Bhargava
Counterview Desk
On January 1, 2019 five vacancies in the Central Information Commission (CIC) were filled up -- serving Information Commissioner Sudhir Bhargava was appointed Chief Information Commissioner; this apart four retired civil servants were appointed Information Commissioners.
Pending for several months, while five of the nine vacancies in CIC were filled up following a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in the Supreme Court byAnjali Bharadwaj, Anjali Johri and Commodore (retd) Lokesh Batra in the Supreme Court, acting as a major push factor in moving the wheels within Government to make these appointments, replies to an RTI plea suggest how the Government of India bypassed a previous apex court ruling on the procedure adopted for this.
The Supreme Court of India ruling in the matter of Union of India vs. Namit Sharma (AIR 2014 SC 122) said, “persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience” such fields as “law, science and technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media or administration and governance, be considered” by search and selection committees under while filling up top CIC vacancies.
The Selection Committee comprises of the Prime Minister, his nominee the Finance Minister, and the leader of the single largest party in Opposition in the Lok Sabha, while the selection committee is led by the cabinet secretary, and includes four Government of India bureaucrats and an independent member.
Basing his 3,000 word analysis on the RTI replies he has received on CIC appointments, Venkatesh Nayak of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), claims, “Both the Search Committees and the Selection Committee have ignored this decision by favouring retired or serving bureaucrats while making shortlists and recommendations for appointment respectively.”

Excerpts from Nayak’s analysis:

According to the file notings released by the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), the process for identifying a suitable candidate for taking over as the Chief Information Commissioner began on the October 12, 2018, more than a month before the previous incumbent demitted office and was completed within a month's duration.
The file notings show that 64 applications were received within the stipulated deadline, from across the country against the vacancy advertised in two English language (“The Hindu” and the “Times of India”) and two Hindi language newspapers (“Dainik Bhaskar” and “Hindustan”). The DoPT has only disclosed the names of these applicants and withheld their applications and bio data by invoking Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act which seeks to exempt personal information of an individual from disclosure.
The six-member Search Committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary included the Secretaries of the DoPT and the Department of Expenditure (in the Finance Ministry), the Information & Broadcasting (I&B), and the Additional Secretary to the Prime Minister of India. The Director of the Institute of Economic Growth was the independent Member. Interestingly, the Secretary, Department of Expenditure, declared that he had applied for the post of Information Commissioner. So after consultations with the PMO, he was retained on the Search Committee.
Only four members of the Search Committee met on November 24, 2018 in the Committee Room of the Cabinet Secretariat to draw up the shortlist. According to the file notings disclosed by the DoPT, the Secretary I&B and the Secretary, Expenditure could not attend the meeting.
The Search Committee shortlisted four candidates for the consideration of the Selection Committee. All four of them were retired IAS officers, including the newly appointed Chief Information Commissioner, Sudhir Bhargava. No women were included in this short list. The list of 68 applicants reveals the names of at least four women. No candidate with other areas of specialisation mentioned in the RTI Act were shortlisted.
This is a clear breach of the Supreme Court's directions. Further, the serving Information Commissioners, Bimal Julka and DP Sinha, who had also applied for the post of the Chief Information Commissioner, were not even shortlisted.
Dr SK Nanda
Gujarat govt ex-babu "preferred"
Three of the four shortlisted candidates had not even applied in response to the advertisement for the vacancy of the Chief Information Commissioner. They included Madhav Lal, a former Secretary of the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, Alok Raawat, a former Secretary of DoPT's sister Department, Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances, RP Watal, the current Principal Adviser Niti Ayog and former Secretary, Department of Expenditure, and Dr SK Nanda, former Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Gujarat.
The Search Committee meeting minutes indicate, its members considered names of other serving and retired civil servants who had not applied at all. This is perplexing to say the least. One of the women applicants had recently retired as the Chief Secretary of the Government of Karnataka. How her candidature was given lesser weightage than that of the former Additional Chief Secretary of Gujarat who had not even put in his application in the first place, is a mystery.
This raises serious questions about the manner in which the Search Committee determined "eminence" in public life. Neither the Committee nor the DoPT have publicised the criteria adopted for determining "eminence in public life". Further, how the claims of the two serving Information Commissioners were undervalued in comparison to the three shortlisted retired bureaucrats who had no previous experience of adjudicating RTI disputes in any Information Commission is also a mystery that needs to be cleared.
What criteria were applied to determine the eligibility of applicants whose applications/bio data for inclusion in the shortlisting/selection process is also not known. This is worrisome because the standards applied to reject applications from those outside the bureaucracy are themselves shrouded in secrecy. Not a single civil society candidate was shortlisted by the Search Committee. The DoPT must urgently disclose the criteria applied for vetting the applications of civil society candidates all of whom were eventually found ineligible by the Search Committee.
The DoPT has advertised more vacancies at the CIC for filling up. As the present Government has less than four months left, it is not desirable to pack any institution with its handpicked candidates. It would be against norms of constitutional propriety for a Government to fill up vacancies when it is at the end of its constitutionally mandated tenure. That process must be left for the Government that will be formed after the General Elections are completed by May 2019.

Comments

TRENDING

Mystery around Gujarat PSU 'transfer' of Rs 250 crore to Canadian firm Karnalyte

By AK Luke, IAS (Retd)*
While returning from a Board meeting of the Oil India Limited (OIL) in Ahmedabad some time in 2012, two officers of the Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd (GSFC), Nanavaty and Patel,  saw me off at the airport. They said they were proceeding to Canada in connection with a project GSFC had entered into with a company there. As we were running late, I hastily wished them the best.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Indians have made 119 nations their ‘karma bhumi’: US-based Hindu NGO tells Rupani

Counterview Desk
In a stinging letter to Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, the US-based Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR), referring to the report citing his justification for the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) – that “while Muslims can choose any one of the 150 Islamic countries in the world (for residence), India is the only country for Hindus" – has said, he should remember, Hindus have made several countries, including USA, their home.

J&K continues to be haunted, as parts of India 'degenerate' into quasi-Kashmir situation

By Rajendran Narayanan*, Sandeep Pandey**
“Jab har saans mein bandook dikhe toh baccha kaise bekhauf rahe?” (How can a child be fearless when she sees a gun in every breath?) remarked Anwar, a gardener from Srinagar, when asked about the situation in Kashmir. On November 30, 2019, a walk through an iron gate in a quiet neighbourhood of Srinagar took us inside a public school. It was 11 am when typically every school is abuzz with activity. Not here though.

Tata Mundra's possible closure? Power ministry's 'pressure tactic' on consumer states

By Bharat Patel*
Tata power has announced to the Union Ministry of Power that Tata Power may be forced to stop operating  its imported coal-based Mundra Ultra-Mega Power Project (UMPP) after February, 2020. It is not only unfortunate but also criminal that irreversible damage has been caused to the fragile ecosystem of Mundra coast for a project that will have a running life of only seven years.

What about religious persecution of Dalits, Adivasis, asks anti-CAA meet off Ahmedabad

By Rajiv Shah
A well-attended Dalit rights meet under the banner “14 Pe Charcha” (discussion on Article 14 of the Indian Constitution), alluding to Prime Minister Narendra Modi well-known campaign phrase of the 2014 Parliamentary elections, “chai pe charcha” (discussion over cup of tea), organized off Ahmedabad, has resolved on Wednesday to hold a 14 kilometres-long rally on April 14 to oppose the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), enacted on December 10-11.

Population control? 10% Indian couples want to delay next pregnancy, but fail

Counterview Desk
Shireen Jejeebhoy, director at Aksha Centre for Equity and Wellbeing, previously senior associate at the Population Council, India, argues that the debate on the country's population was fuelled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day address to the nation, where he drew attention to “concern” about the challenges posed by this ‘exploding’ population growth, needs to centre around the promotion of rights and education, instead of the language of explosion and the threat of coercion that this term implies.

Upendra Baxi on foolish excellence, Indian judges and Consitutional cockroaches

By Rajiv Shah
In a controversial assertion, top legal expert Upendra Baxi has sought to question India's Constitution makers for neglecting human rights and social justice. Addressing an elite audience in Ahmedabad, Prof Baxi said, the constitutional idea of India enunciated by the Constituent Assembly tried to resolve four key conflicting concepts: governance, development, rights and justice.

Kerala governor turned History Congress into political arena, 'insulted' Prof Irfan Habib

Counterview Desk
In a signed statement, office bearers of the Aligarh Society of History and Archaeology (ASHA), Prof Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi (president), Prof Jabir Raza (vice-president), Prof Manvendra Kumar Pundhir (secretary) and Prof Farhat Hasan (joint secretary), have said that Kerala governor Arif Mohammad Khan had sought to insult veteran historian Prof Irfan Habib, 88, at the 80th session of the Indian History Congress, even as turning it into his “political arena”.