Skip to main content

Citing industrial pollution, top environmentalist asks Centre not to lift ban on new industrial units in South Gujarat

Amla Khadi, most contaminated
 tributary of Narmada river
By Our Representative
In a letter to the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), top Gujarat-based environment group,  Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, has urged the Government of India to ask industrial units of the Panoli Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) estate to bear the cost of Sanjali pond decontamination following dumping of industrial effluents, and pay for setting up two pollution-monitoring stations in village Sanjali and next to the National Highway. The letter has also asked the Centre to "strong steps" against units in Ankleshwar GIDC estate, for not doing enough to stop effluent contaminated rainwater from gushing from Amla Khadi towards Piraman, Ankleshwar and Diva villages.
Pointing out that there is a need to take "strong exemplary action against Narmada Clean Tech Ltd. of Ankleshwar for illegal discharge of chemical effluents", too, the letter, signed by senior environmentalist Rohit Prajapati, wants the Centre to continue keeping the entire area into “critical zone” till pollution issues of the region are not resolved. By keeping the whole area into "critical zone", the moratorium imposed on the region for setting up industrial units would continue.
Addressed to Jayanthi Natarajan, Minister of State for Environment and Forests, and Secretary, MoEF, as also other senior officials of the Central Pollution Control Board, the letter says, "The residents of Sanjali and Piraman villages are distressed with the air and industrial effluent pollution caused repeatedly by the Panoli and Ankleshwar GIDC estates. The Gram Panchayats have frequently complained, phoned and submitted all proofs to the Gujarat government."
Prajapati informed the Centre, "During our regular visits to monitor the environment, we have found that air and industrial pollution continues unabated in this area." Yet, most unfortunately, "the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) chairperson has reiterated publicly that the GIDC officials were ignoring GPCB’s directions, and he is helpless about the situation."
He added, "The pesticides, dyes and chemical industries in Panoli GIDC estate surrounding the Sanjali village contaminated the village pond with its untreated chemical waste in the past as also this year during monsoon in July. Though this happens frequently, the Gujarat government and the GPCB only take token measures." Worse, though contamination of the can be termed a disaster, the Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority "also remains apathetic." 
On July 21, 2013 Prajapati said, he accompanied by Kantibhai Mistry, Zia Pathan of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Salimbhai Patel, deputy Sarpanch of Piraman village, Hitesh Baraiya, a senior assistant scientist of GPCB and others had visited Sanjali, Panoli and Ankleshwar. "During the visit, the red-yellow coloured industrial effluents of the Panoli GIDC industries could be seen in the Sanjali village", forcing the GPCB to take samples. 
"The untreated industrial effluent discharge from the Panoli GIDC could be seen flowing unabated across various village roads in Panoli GIDC. The GPCB authorities too were taken aback with such blatant flouting of rules by the industries. Villagers upset with the air pollution vented their anger before the visiting GPCB officials. They have lost confidence in the state government and the GPCB, which is indifferent towards blatant flouting of rules by the industries", Prajapati said.
Pointing out that the Narmada Clean Tech Ltd runs the final effluent treatment plant and monitors the chemical discharge in the Ankleshwar and Panoli GIDC estates and is empowered to fine the industries for violations as well, Prapapati further alleged, "the Narmada Clean Tech Ltd itself discharges untreated waste illegally in Amla Khadi, a fact accepted by the GPCB". Given this framework, he wondered, "How can one expect it to hold up the rulebook? It raises a fundamental question, who and when will take action against the Narmada Clean Tech Ltd?"
Prajapati further said, on July 20, 2013, when Piraman deputy Sarpanch Mr. Salimbhai Patel sought an answer from the Narmada Clean Tech Ltd authorities for repeated discharge of untreated industrial waste, and they replied that they were "not discharging it in Amla Khadi", when on the very same day, at 3 30 pm, Salimbhai Patel risking his personal wellbeing, trekked all the way in Amla Khadi to photograph and video record the discharge.
All this is happening when the Gujarat government and the industries of Ankleshwar, Panoli and Jhagadia GIDC estates are trying "with all their might to remove their area from critical zone tag; they do nothing to improve the much-needed critical infrastructure for pollution control," Prajapti said, adding, "Both, the government and the GPCB have failed to take any long term, deterrent measures against the polluting industries of the area." 

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.