Skip to main content

Gujarat govt "violating" right to education through pilot project on admitting poor children to private schools

Counterview Desk
Can there be a pilot project on how to implement the Right to Education Act, which was passed by India’s Parliament four years ago? While this would look strange to any sensible person, particularly when a law has been passed and has also begun being implemented all over India, senior activist-turned-politician Sukhdev Patel believes that this is what the Gujarat government has tried to do in order to put to practice a government resolution (GR), which decided to set aside just about 5,300 seats all over Gujarat among the non-granted privately-run primary schools for children of the poorer sections.
Calling the move “highly objectionable”, Patel, who is a senior child rights expert, says, “The GR, bought out in 2013 and being implemented now, unfortunately, was brought in, in lieu of the provision of 25 per cent reservation for poor and deprived children in privately-owned unaided primary schools. Even this GR is not being implemented. The GR itself was deliberately brought late by a year. Even after it was brought in, the decision to set aside merely 5,300 seats in private schools is simply laughable, and suggests the Guajrat government’s lack of interest in implementing the RTE.”
Patel further adds, “Even the 5,300 seats set aside for the poor and the deprived was not implemented till July. The result is, in the hope of getting quality education, large number of poor and deprived children took admission in the private schools by paying very high fees. There is no provision in Gujarat for the parents of these children to get back the fees that they have paid.” He adds, “Under the RTE, it is the duty of the government to provide free and compulsory education up to the primary level. It is this provision which is sought to be violated.”
Heading the Gujarat chapter of Anil Kerjiwal’s Aam Admi Party (AAP), Patel -- who has represented on the matter to  the Gujarat government through the district collector, Ahmedabad -- has demanded that these children should be provided “free education at government cost” and whatever spending the parents have made should be “returned forthwith”, failing which he and his supporters would begin agitation.
“There are government resolutions which clearly say that the government is obliged to provide free and compulsory education, including textbooks, to children", he said, regretting that there are a large number of provisions of the RTE which the Gujarat government has still not implemented. Thus, despite clear-cut RTE guidelines, the state government has still not implemented eighth class in the primary schools even today, “which should also be put into practice immediately.”
Refusal to implement 25 per cent reservation for backward children in private primary schools comes at a time when a recent study submitted to the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA), Gujarat, by Dalit Hit Rakshak Manch (DHRM), based on gathering secondary data of the SSA portal of the Gujarat government, reveals that there has been a quantum jump of the number of privately-run unaided schools across Gujarat. There were 3,293 private unaided schools with 6,90,433 students in 2005-06, which reached 6,403 private unaided schools with 20,13,161 children in 2010-11.
During the same period, there was a stagnation in the admission to government schools, the study reveals. Thus, in 2004-05, there were 32,258 government schools, in which 59,63,898 students were admitted. While the number of government schools slightly went up to 33,537 in 2010-11, these schools admitted lesser number of children – 59,17,835. As for the government aided private schools, their numbers increased from 765 schools with 1,55,808 students in 2005-06 to 788 with 2,14,049 students – which again goes to suggest that government schools were not being “preferred”.

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

How retraints were imposed on academic freedom on the IIM-Ahmedabad campus

By Sandeep Pandey*  This is the seventh consecutive academic year when I would have gone as a visiting faculty member to the Indian Institute of Management at Ahmedabad to teach an Elective course on Transformational Social Movements to the second year of Post Graduate Programme students. But the invitation has not come so far and it looks like it is the end of my teaching stint at IIM, at least, so long as the Bhartiya Janata Party remains in power at the centre.