Skip to main content

Land bill will mean four times compensation, "adversely affect" real estate, industry projects: CRISIL

Counterview Desk
The CRISIL Research -- which has made a quick assessment of the impact of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2012 (formerly known as the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011) on real estate,  infrastructure and industry -- has said that the Bill will lead to “increase in the gestation time of projects and overall costs.”
The Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on August 30, 2013. The bill, which replaces the century-old Land Acquisition Act, 1894, proposes a unified legislation for acquisition of land and adequate rehabilitation mechanisms for all affected persons.
A CRISIL note says, “With the rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) clauses of the Land Bill, CRISIL Research expects land prices to increase as the expectation of land owners will be higher. The land acquisition process will be longer and project gestation period will increase. Currently, the proportion of supply (which comprises projects of over 50 acres) to total planned supply in the top 10 Indian cities is 25 per cent “ (see table).
In case of industrial and infrastructure projects, CRISIL Research believes that “the overall project gestation time as well as costs will increase. Our interactions with industry players suggest that the overall project costs will increase by around 3-5 per cent. It expects this increase in overall costs to impact the viability of such projects.”
The top consulting firm CRISIL's comment comes close on the heels of NGOs registering their protest exactly for opposite reasons. They point towards inadequacies in ensuring consultation with people before land acquisition (click HERE to see National Alliance for People's Movement's view).
CRISIL has commented on the basis of the provision of the compensation policy, which “calls for payment of four times the market value of the land in rural areas and two times the market value of land in urban areas.” CRISIL adds, “The market value of the acquired land is based on (i) market value specified in the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 for the registration of sale deeds; or (ii) average of the top 50 per cent of all the sale deeds in the similar type of land situated in the vicinity; (iii) or the amount agreed upon as compensation for acquisition of land for private companies or PPPs.”
Further, “the value of the assets (trees, plants, buildings etc) attached to the land being acquired will be added to this amount. The Bill proposes that in cases where the ownership of an acquired land is sold to any person, without any development made, 40 per cent of the profit made will be shared among all the persons from whom the land was acquired.”
CRISIL says, “The provisions of the Bill relating to land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement will be applicable in cases when the government acquires land, (a) for its own use and control, (b) to transfer it for the use of private companies for public purpose(including PPP), and (c) on the request of private companies for immediate use for public purpose. The term ‘public purpose’ in the Bill includes, (a) strategic defence purposes and national security, (b) roads, railways and ports, built by government and public sector enterprises (excluding private hospitals, private educational institutions and private hotels) (c) project affected people, (d) planned development or improvement of villages, and (e) residential purposes for the poor and landless.”
CRISIL also regrets the Bill's provision for "consent of 80 per cent of the landowners in case the land is acquired by private companies and 70 per cent in case the land is acquired under the Private-Public Partnership (PPP) mode." It has also not liked the "process of obtaining consent", which will "have to be carried out along with the Social Impact Assessment (SIA) study." All of it put together, it reiterates will lead to a compensation which is "four times the market value in rural areas and twice in urban areas.”

Comments

TRENDING

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Palm oil industry deceptively using geenwashing to market products

By Athena*  Corporate hypocrisy is a masterclass in manipulation that mostly remains undetected by consumers and citizens. Companies often boast about their environmental and social responsibilities. Yet their actions betray these promises, creating a chasm between their public image and the grim on-the-ground reality. This duplicity and severely erodes public trust and undermines the strong foundations of our society.

'Fake encounter': 12 Adivasis killed being dubbed Maoists, says FACAM

Counterview Desk   The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), even as condemn what it has called "fake encounter" of 12 Adivasi villagers in Gangaloor, has taken strong exception to they being presented by the authorities as Maoists.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9. 

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.

Mired in controversy, India's polio jab programme 'led to suffering, misery'

By Vratesh Srivastava*  Following the 1988 World Health Assembly declaration to eradicate polio by the year 2000, to which India was a signatory, India ran intensive pulse polio immunization campaigns since 1995. After 19 years, in 2014, polio was declared officially eradicated in India. India was formally acknowledged by WHO as being free of polio.