In a somersault, Gujarat govt says it never wanted to review NGO untouchability study

By Rajiv Shah

In a complete about-turn, the Gujarat government has asserted that it never asked the CEPT University to review or refute an NGO study by Navsarjan Trust on wide prevalence of untouchability in Gujarat's rural areas. The NGO study titled "Understanding Untouchability", carried out in 2010, was based on a survey of about 1,600 villages. The statement is in total contrast to what the introduction to the CEPT report says -- that the state government had sponsored it in order to "review" the NGO study and find out if there was such wide prevalence of untouchability as the study claims. It is not known what has prompted the state government to make a change in its stance.

The statement -- issued to refute media reports that the CEPT report was meant to prove that the NGO study's findings on untouchability were unfounded -- also states that the CEPT University was merely asked "to suggest ways on how to remove caste discrimination in Gujarat". It says this despite the fact that several earlier government statements, including a government resolution (GR) issued two years ago, had all along been saying that the state government had asked the CEPT University to find out if the allegations of untouchability in the NGO study were correct.
The statement does not stop here. It simultaneously declares that allegations of untouchability in the NGO study -- which was carried out by a couple of world-class scholars hired by John F Kennedy Centre for Justice and Human Rights for Navsarjan Trust --are "misplaced", claiming, "The social justice and employment department sent its officials to several of the 1,589 villages where the NGO survey was carried out, and they found that the allegations of wide prevalence of untouchability are totally wrong."
While the statement does not say when did it send officials to 75 of these villages to find out the "truth" about untouchability, a top knowledgeable source has told www.counterview.net that "Dalits in several of the villages were forced to declare, on affidavit, that they did not face issues of untouchability in their village." The source said, "It did this taking advantage of the Gujarati version of the NGO report, 'Understanding Untouchability' -- Abhadcched ni Bhal -- which gives a profile of 75 villages to cite examples of untouchability in rural areas."
Interestingly, the CEPT University report -- running into 300 pages -- says that it report's findings are based on survey of five villages of Gujarat to "review" the NGO's untouchability study in 1,589 villages. Prepared by a team headed by Prof R Parthasarathy, a scholar known for his expertise on water resources, critics have wondered why was a senior sociologist not chosen for a "review" on untouchability in Gujarat. Notably, Parthasarathy's report sets aside issues of "discrimination" in villages (it does not even use the word untouchability) as a matter of "perceptions", continuing for generations.
No doubt, the CEPT report does give certain examples of caste discrimination in villages, as found visible during cultural functions, but believes that such differences exist even within families. It also finds such examples like refusal of Dalits entering into temples as something normal, born out of Dalits' own desire. And if Dalit youths do not participate in such functions as Navratri by mixing up with youths of other castes, this is because -- the report seeks to declare -- the Dalit elders wisely advise them not to do so to avoid any quarrel! In fact, the report even states that the Dalits are happy with their own festivals like Ambedkar Jayanti in the same way as upper caste people are happy with their own festivals!

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog