Skip to main content

Why are India's ruling politicians, top supporters 'avoiding' vaccinated first?

Baba Ramdev with Shivraj Singh Chauhan 
By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
After the Government of India approved two vaccines, the Indian version of Oxford’s AstraZeneca, Covishield, launched by the Serum Institute, and Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin, developed with the help of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), a section of media has gone overboard to launch pro-government propaganda after it was alleged that Covaxin was approval bypassing procedures and norms.
The data of phase three trials for the Bharat Biotech vaccine have not yet been made public, nor has there been any peer review of the entire exercise. Revealing this, one of India’s top vaccine scientists, Prof Gagandeep Kang, questioning the approval, asserted, while she was ready to volunteer for a vaccine trial, she won’t like to be vaccinated with the Bharat Biotech vaccine.
In an interview with Karan Thapar for “The Wire”, Prof Kang said, without efficacy data no vaccine should be cleared, underlining, the clearance was given to Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin without on a wrong premise. She added, she found the limited approval given to the Bharat Biotech vaccine without Phase 3 trial efficacy was “extremely confusing”.
There was no reaction to this among government circles. But BJP IT cell and ministers started targeting Akhilesh Yadav, when the Samajwadi Party president said, though he had full confidence in the Indian doctors and scientists, he was not going to get ‘vaccinated’ by the BJP’s political vaccine. Yadav was questioning the way the government had rushed to give clearance to the Bharat Biotech vaccine, along with Oxford’s AstraZeneca.
It is difficult to understand why Yadav was being targeted. He had just questioned the entire process of approval and the way public health crisis was allowed to be escalated. Political parties have the duty to raise questions, as what happened was related to public health safety. The government technically represents the people’s will, as it it elected by people. But at the same point of time opposition is duty bound to remind the government about its failure.
Meanwhile, Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan gave instructions to his administration about the vaccination process to be adopted, and, unsurprisingly, asserted that he won’t get be vaccinated first. “I have decided that I will not be vaccinated for now. First it should be administered to others. My turn should come afterwards. We have to work to ensure that priority groups are administered with the vaccine first”, Chauhan said. 
One can blame Akhilesh Yadav for being ‘political’, but what about Prof Gagandeep Kang? If Yadav is wrong, what about Chauhan, who is refusing to be vaccinated first?
The same day, Baba Ramdev said, he would not take the vaccine as he fully ‘trusted’ yoga. However, he added, people with comorbidities should be given the vaccine first. Ironically, it is the same Ramdev who claimed he had ‘found’ a treatment for coronavirus. If Ramdev had so much of faith in the vaccine, he should opt for the same. But by suggesting that he would not take it and yoga can do the job for him, Ramdev sent a message that those who do yoga wouldn’t be infected!
Prof Gagandeep Kang
How would the Indian political class ensure that people have faith in the two vaccines without taking the first dose? Some TV channels have started sending their reporters to be vaccinated, claiming within no time that nothing happened to them. Is this the way to promote a vaccine? Do clinical trials happen when a person starts claiming within 24 hours that ‘nothing’ has happened them? The way India hurriedly approved its vaccination programme is turning out to be an international embarrassment. The “Washington Post” said, “India’s vaccine nationalism is a global risk.”
World over leaders have offered themselves to be vaccinated first to give a boost to the scientific community and build confidence among the people in the vaccination programme. United States president-elect Joe Biden got himself vaccinated on December 20, while vice president Kamala Harris got the vaccination shot on December 29. Three former American presidents Bill Clinton, George Bush and Barack Obama have approached requisite American agencies to be vaccinated live on TV.  
Saudi prince Mohammad Bin Salman was the first to get vaccinated in his country. Russian president Vladimir Putin got his daughter vaccinated first, while British prime minister Boris Johnson is likely to be vaccinated soon. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has got himself vaccinated first.
In India, we are hearing preaching and publicity. This is not the time to show one’s ‘bravery’ but to build confidence among the people. Haryana minister Anil Vij offered himself for a trial shot of Covaxin by Bharat Biotech, but found himself Covid positive within a few days. He was admitted in Medanta hospital for nearly one month and is now recuperating at home.
The vaccination process has to be simple and without any claims and counterclaims. It is an issue of public safety. Scientists have done their job, health workers have risked their life saving us. But an unfortunate situation has been created after the Bharat Biotech and the Serum Institute publicly challenged each other. No scientist ever says that their work is 110% or 200% risk free. Anyone speaking like this looks like a street vendor who wants to the product at any cost.
Such terminology from senior persons should not have happened. They are only dilute the seriousness of the entire process as well as the vaccines. It is the duty of the government to follow the approval process strictly. We have waited for so long and will wait for more but one must ensure that things are done transparently.
One can blame Akhilesh Yadav for being ‘political’, but what about Prof Kang? If Yadav is wrong, what about Chauhan, who is refusing to be vaccinated first? Indeed, the vaccination process should be beyond party politics. It should be celebrated as victory of science over a dreaded disease. Would good sense prevail?
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

veerar said…
It is Bill Gates' Vaccine Fanaticism objecting all other combinations like HCQ,Zinc compuounds,Vitamin C and D etc, that is the most dangerous and NOT the so-called India's Vaccine Nationalism whatever it means. It is the Western Pharma Cos who benefit by way of HUGE PROFITs by any Vaccination Program,enjoying Immunity against Suits,filed by Victims who suffer paralysis,infertility (STERIKITY),etc and even Death is caused,in some cases as in the recent Vaccines against COVID-19...

TRENDING

Top upper caste judges 'biased' towards Dalit colleagues: US Bar Association report

By Rajiv Shah  A high profile report prepared by the influential  American Bar Association (ABA) Center for Human Rights , taking note of the fact that “in the 70-year history of the Indian Republic, only six Dalit judges have been appointed to the Supreme Court”, has taken strong exception to what it calls “lack of representation of Dalits” in the legal profession and the judiciary.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Billion vaccine doses? Devil is in details: 70% haven't got 2nd jab; numbers jacked up

By Prof Ujjwal K Chowdhury*  India has reached the one billion Covid-19 vaccinations milestone. It is indeed a great news and a big salute to the less paid ordinary health-workers in interiors of India for this feat. The government wants all of India's 944 million adults to get vaccinated this year. Around three-quarters of adults in the country of 1.3 billion people have had one shot and around 30 percent are fully vaccinated, the government says.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Failure of 'trickle down theory' behind India's poor Global Hunger Index rating

By Dr Gian Singh*  On October 14, 2021, two organisations, Concern Worldwide (An Irish aid agency) and WeltHungerHilfe (a German organization that researches the problem of global hunger), jointly published the Global Hunger Index (GHI) for 2021. These organizations have included 116 countries in the world hunger rankings.

Global Hunger Index: Govt of India response pathetic, 'lacks' scientific empirical evidence

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* Come 16 October – and the world once again focused on the most basic need for a person’s survival: food! The first World Food Day was observed in 1994, to mark the launch of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. Ever since, the day is marked to highlight the need and importance of food security across the world. The significance is accentuated especially in these difficult times like the C-19 povidandemic. The theme for 2021 is ‘Safe Food Now for a Healthier Tomorrow’, emphasising on the various immediate and long-term benefits of consuming safe and healthy food.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Fresh efforts to subsume Buddhism within Hindu fold 'undermining' Ambedkar

By Aviral Anand*  From Yeola in 1935, when Dr Ambedkar announced that he would not die a Hindu, to Nagpur in 1956 when he converted to Buddhism, is a considerable distance in time. But, there was in him a need to make a public announcement in 1935 about moving away from Hinduism. 

March opposes Sabarmati Ashram renovation: 'Mahatmaji had kept open for access to all'

Counterview Desk A Sevagram to Sabarmati march, which began on October 17 from Wardha (Maharashtra) and will end on October 24 in Ahmedabad (Gujarat), has demanded that the Sabarmati Ashram, the government should not impose "the fashion and glitz of a shallow modernity" at the cost of Rs 1,200 crore, in the name of renovating the Ashram founded by Gandhiji.

Nehru legacy? GDP-centric growth has had 'no positive impact' on people's livelihood

By Dr Kamal Nayan Kabra*  Experience has shown that many counties adopt measures to go in for the growth of their GDP, basically in the existing framework, though also going in for, at the same time, new products and technologies and similar other changes. It is believed that by means of this process enough new job opportunities would emerge to meet the economy’s needs both in terms of numbers as also in terms of the requisite remuneration (wages) as also the supplies of the goods and services to maintain the economy on an even keel.