Skip to main content

Shyama Prasad Mukherjee 'ignored': Why India's rulers try to appropriate Netaji legacy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

“Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose would have been truly proud of India and its military might”, said Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a programme organised to commemorate his 125th birth anniversary, which falls next year, 2022. But then the current regime is 'expert' in political profit and loss. Leaders acquire importance in accordance with their 'public image value'.
It is indeed ironic that the Hindu right is trying to grab the legacy of Netaji and his Azad Hind Fauj, whose composition reflects how he was proud of India's multicultural, multiethnic heritage. Yet, the right-wing is glorifying him without reading and understanding his work and ideas. This is how the Brahminical elite seeks to appropriate every icon, cleverly sidestepping progressive ideas.
The right-wing did it with Dr BR Ambedkar and Bhagat Singh. But somehow they failed because the ideological legacy of both of them has been very powerful and fascinating to ignore. Those who know the real contribution of these leaders have successfully rebuffed government attempt to use their name for political end.
As for Netaji, historians feet a bit shy because of his association with the German and Japanese fascists. The fact is, Netaji’s efforts to mobilise support from Germany and Japan at that time was purely for the sake of liberating India, as he felt strongly about the British exploitation of India. His differences with the Congress leadership or even communist leader MN Roy became evident when he opposed their support for the war efforts against fascists, as he felt these parties and leaders were compromising.
However, Netaji’s book 'The Indian Struggle 1920-1934’ is a great representation of his ideas about India. In this book, he asked VD Savarkar and MA Jinnah to leave their political association with the British and instead join hand with him in the struggle for independent India. However, both refused.
Even when Netaji took support from the Japanese to liberate India to counter the British power, it is important to understand his idea about India. He genuinely felt that the Congress was not speaking about the honourable release of those Indians who were incarcerating in the jail for their act of 'militancy'.
Among them, he mentioned the heroic Garhwalis (of the Garhwal Rifles fame) who did not fire upon their own fellow countrymen simply because they happened to be Muslims. It is strange that the Congress leadership, including Gandhiji, refused to speak for them.
The most interesting part of Netaji's idea of India is his insistence that all privileges, distinctions and vested interests would need to be abolished to bring social, economic and political equality. He emphasised, a free India will not be a land of capitalists, landlords and castes. Free India will be social, economic and political democracy, he said. He also spoke about depressed classes and their representation.
Hindu right is trying to grab the legacy of Netaji and his Azad Hind Fauj, whose composition reflects how he was proud of India's multicultural, multiethnic heritage
Will today’s rulers read Netaji, especially his ideological leanings, and not worship his military uniform? The problem with them is that they are against socialism and equality, and worship 'weaponisation' and 'militarism'. How would Netaji be proud when people are being divided and segmented? How would he see a community being targeted just because of its identity? How would he feel farmers committing suicide and being termed as anti-national?
Azad Hind Radio reflected India's diversity. It used to broadcast its messages in Hindi, English, Bangla, Telugu, Tamil and Pashto. Will today’s rulers stop imposing Hindi and respect diversity of different languages of India?
Shyama Prasad Mukherjee
It is amusing to see Hindutva votaries seeking to grab Netaji’s image in Bengal while completely ignoring Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, one of their top ideological mentors from Bengal. Let the BJP seek vote in the name of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee in Bengal and find out how much support will they get. They must know: Netaji is an icon of inclusive India and one can’t use him for divisive ideas and actions.
Indeed, Netaji’s 'Jai Hind' was the salutation for an ideal, modern India which consists of all communities, Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, others. Those who speak about unilateralism can’t claim the legacy of the man who was completely modern and felt India will only be strengthened by encouraging scientific thinking, fair representation of all, including peasants, depressed classes, trade unions etc.
Netaji favoured intellectual discourse. It is time one studies and disseminates his ideological legacy among common people to understand what kind of India he wanted. This is the only way one can counter those who are trying to use him for their ulterior motives.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

Anonymous said…
Election time in Bengal. You name it the BJP will say it as long as it helps them win elections.

TRENDING

Did Modi promote Dholavira, a UNESCO site now, as Gujarat CM? Facts don't tally

By Rajiv Shah  As would generally happen, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet – that not only was he “absolutely delighted” with the news of UNESCO tag to Dholavira, but he “ first visited ” the site during his “student days and was mesmerised by the place” – is being doubted by his detractors. None of the two tweets, strangely, even recalls once that it’s a Harappan site in Gujarat.

Labelling a Jesuit a Marxist? It's like saying if you use a plane, you become American

Jesuits: Cedric Prakash, Stan Swamy By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* A thirteen- fourteen-year-old has many dreams! That's an impressionable age; at the cusp of finishing school. It is also a time when one tastes a different kind of freedom: to go for camps with boys of your own age (not with ones family). Such camps and outings were always enjoyed to the hilt. The ones, however, which still remain etched in my memory are the mission camps to the Jesuit missions in Maharashtra and Gujarat.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Giant conglomerates 'favoured': Whither tribal rights for jal-jungle-jameen?

Prafull Samantara By Mohammad Irshad Ansari*  The struggle for “Jal, Jungle and Jameen” has been a long-drawn battle for the tribal communities of India. This tussle was once again in the limelight with the proposed diamond mining in the Buxwaha forest of Chhatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). The only difference in this movement was the massive social media support it gained, which actually seems to tilt the scale for the tribal people in a long time.

If not Modi, then who? Why? I (an ordinary citizen) am there! Main hoon naa!

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The number of women ministers is doubled in early July from the first term after cabinet reshuffle by the present government led by Narendra Modi. While there were 06 women ministers in the previous term, this term there are 11. The previous two governments led by Dr Manmohan Singh had 10 women ministers in each tenure. Are these number of women ministers something to rejoice in the near 75 years of independence? Yes maybe, if we think that things are slowly improving in the patriarchal system. This change is less likely to achieve gender balance in the parliament otherwise we require more than 11 as per the 33% reservation . This change is also less likely because the men politicians’ inability to handle the country’s mess is becoming more and more evident and especially during the corona crisis. Seems, the addition of more women ministers may be a result of the recent assembly elections where women played a decisive role in the election results. For example

Effluent discharge into deep sea? Modi told to 'reconsider' Rs 2275 crore Gujarat project

Counterview Desk  In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, well-known Gujarat-based environmentalist, Mahesh Pandya of the Paryavaran Mitra, has protested against the manner in with the Gujarat government is continuing with its deep sea effluent disposal project despite environmental concerns.

Gujarat govt gender insensitive? Cyclone package for fisherfolk 'ignores' poor women

By Our Representative A memorandum submitted to the Gujarat government by various fisherfolk associations of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat under the leadership of Ahmedabad NGO Centre for Social Justice's senior activist Arvind Khuman, who is based in Amreli, has suggested that the relief package offered to the fishermen affected by the Tauktae cyclone is not only inadequate, it is also gender insensitive.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Debt bondage, forced labour, sexual abuse in Gujarat's Bt cottonseed farms: Dutch study

By Rajiv Shah  A just-released study, sponsored by a Netherlands-based non-profit, Arisa , “Seeds of Oppression Wage sharecropping in Bt cottonseed production in Gujarat, India”, has said that a new form of bondage, or forced labour, exists in North India’s Bt cottonseed farms, in which bhagiyas, or wage sharecroppers, are employed against advances and are then often required to work for years together “without regular payment of wages.”

Govt of India has 'no moral right' to declare national day for Muslim women, Naqvi told

Counterview Desk  In what has been described as a nationwide outpouring of condemnation, following the announcement by Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, Minister of Minority Affairs, declaring August 1 as ‘Muslim Women’s Rights Day’ to mark the anniversary of the Triple Talaq law, over 650 citizens have said it is nothing but "cynical optics" of using Muslim women’s rights in the face of an "unprecedented" onslaught against the rights of the Muslims in recent years.