Skip to main content

A Khalistani plot to tarnish Republic Day rally of 20 lakh farmers on 8 lakh tractors?

By Harsh Thakor*

A historic peaceful march in the Capital of over 20 lakh peasants riding on eight lakh tractors is being foisted as a conspiracy against the nation. The sinister act of hoisting the Sikh flag at the Red Fort was undertaken by a person suspected to be a BJP agent, Deep Sidhu. He allegedly infiltrated the ranks, masquerading as a farmer activist.
Sections of the Kisan Sangharsh Committee, particularly the Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU)-Krantikari appeared to have played into the hands of the rulers by raising Khalistani politics and robbing the agitation of its secular democratic prestige.
While the marchers stuck to the plan and did not divert from the route, certain disruptionist elements from the Kisan Sangharsh Committee with Khalistani overtones violated the discipline and started attacking police barricades. Tragically, one farmer succumbed to police attacks.
BKU (Ugrahan) secretary Sukhdev Singh Khokri told me that the conduct at Red Fort was a complete aberration of the agenda planned with almost every participant adhering to the conditions agreed upon. The provocation virtually gave a licence to the rulers to launch repression, paving the way for justifying terror on farmers, he added.
Naujwan Bhrat Sabha leader Rupinder Singh Chaunda agreed with him. Sections of social media played a sinister game by portraying the march as an act of anarchy or plot against the state, going to the extent of even denying the event as a genuine farmers’ rally.
BKU (Ugrahan) president Joginder Singh Ugrahan said that the protest march was successfully conducted in a disciplined manner, adding, protest marching on the streets of Delhi is a fundamental democratic right of the people and the Modi government was looking for an excuse to crush this right.
According to him, a struggle is being fought for farmers’ demands, which is being supported by people of all religions and castes of society. The movement cannot be allowed to be used for the purposes of creating a religion-based state. The flag hoisting belonging to a particular religion provided the government an opportunity to campaign against the movement, he added.
Majority of participants in the tractor rally was from Punjab. They came from the BKU (Ugrahan) ranks, followed by that of the Kirti Kisan Union. Also notable was the big landless labour Dalit contingent participating organised by the Zameen Prapt Sangarsh Committee and the Punjab Khet Mazdoor Union.
Countless preparatory rallies and meetings were stage in Delhi and in Punjab. A section of farmers entered into confrontation at the barricades and police threw tear gas. However, in general it went peacefully. In spite of the several permutations and combinations the basic unity was preserved.
Preparatory programmes were launched all over Punjab sowing the seeds for the success of the event. Leaders like Rajinder Singh of the Kirti Kisan Union, Joginder Singh Ugrahan and Shingara Singh Mann of BKU (Ugrahan) played a major role in this.
Farmers in across Punjab protested at toll plazas, in front of the houses of BJP leaders, in front of the business places of Ambani. and Adani and in the parks along railway stations. On January 19, a protest against World Trade Organisation (WTO) was organised, where effigies of Narendra Modi and WTO were burned.
On January 20 at Pakora Chowk on Tikri border of Delhi a programme 'Godi media Juth rakha' was staged exposing lies on the social media. Addressing the gathering BKU (EU) leaders Shingara Singh Mann and Jaswinder Singh Longowal said that the Modi government has been testing the patience of farmers, who have been struggling in bone-chilling cold nights for months to get the agriculture laws repealed.
On January 21 a major solidarity programme of mobilising 250 tractors was staged in Nihalsinghwala district, A rally started from Saidoka with slogans condemning the Modi government. Buta Singh Bhagike, Tiran Saidoke, Jagmohan Singh Saidoke, Hardeep Singh Mada, Kartar Pamma and Shingara Singh Takhtupura addressed a gathering. 
Again, on January 21 in Sangat block a major rally was staged from Naruana to Dumwali Another rally was staged in Shakhot area in Barnala, involving 400 tractors. Balwant Mansial and Gurcharan Singh Chahal addressed the gathering.
On January 22, a large number of tractors staged protests along the Delhi borders and marched there in large convoys. Estimates Sukhdev Singh Kokri Kalan, general secretary of the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Ekta Ugrahan), the convoys of more than 30,000 tractors were on the move. They had reached Delhi on invitation of 32 farmer organizations.
In Nawanshahr, on January 22, a group of 300 tractors left from the district Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar to join the tractor parade in Delhi under the leadership of Kirti Kisan Union leader Master Bhupinder Singh Waraich and district secretary Tarsem Singh Bains. Convoys were also sent to Delhi by union leaders Makhan Singh Bhanmajara, Buta Singh Mahmudpur, Avtar Kat, Jasbir Deep, Raghbir Singh Asmanpur and Hari Ram Rasoolpuri.
Meanwhile, a three-day programme was held in Mumbai at Azad Maidan from January 23 to 26 involving many spectrums of the opposition, particularly Left peasant organizations. There was significant mobilization from Nasik and Dahanu district. It was supported by Shiv Sena and Congress. Around 12,000 farmers participated in a rally. It included a small section of industrial workers, too.
---
*Independent journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...