Skip to main content

India's GHG emission may 'soon' become second largest in world: CJI told to intervene

Counterview Desk 

Shankar Sharma, a senior power and climate analyst based in Karnataka, in a letter emailed to Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, even as expressing concern over “climate emergency” looming large over India, has said that there is a “massive societal concerns over the pollution/ contamination of air, water and soil in the country.”
Referring to his earlier emails to the Supreme Court as also senior officials of the Government of India on “concerns of the people over the alarmingly deteriorating environmental condition in the country which can be associated with potentially enormous consequences”, Sharma apprehends that while India’s total GHG emissions is already the third largest, the current growth trajectory suggests “India can soon become the second largest emitter after China.”
According to him, while China, UK, EU, Japan and South Korea have joined over 110 countries that have set net zero green house gas (GHG) target for mid-century, “there is not a single projection or policy of our country which may even remotely indicate that India’s total GHG emissions will be reduced even by 2040/50.” 
On the contrary, he says, “The draft national energy policy, 2017 projected that energy related Emissions per capita will increase from 1.2 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent/capita in 2012 to 2.7-3.5 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent/capita in 2040.”

Excerpts:

The UN secretary general has recently said on the existential threats associated with climate change. He has urged all countries to declare climate emergencies. Such a message indicates the gravity of the situation at global scale, and needing concrete measures by every government. At least 38 countries have already declared such a state of emergency.
Recently, the UK announced that it would seek to cut emissions by 68% (compared to 1990 levels) by 2030, and a few weeks earlier, China announced that its emissions would peak by 2030, and reach net zero by about 2060. But it is sad that India has not yet deemed it necessary to declare a climate emergency or a commitment to reduce its total GHG emissions even by 2040. This scenario throws up the question whether the Union government does not see any serious threats to its communities, especially the poor and the vulnerable sections, from the looming consequences of climate change?
China, UK, EU, Japan and South Korea have joined what the UN estimates is now a total of over 110 countries that have set net zero targets for mid-century. Together, they represent more than 65% of global emissions and more than 70% of the world economy. One environmental observer has noted: "To stand a reasonable chance of hitting the 1.50 C target we need to halve total emissions by the end of 2030, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”
The UN says it wants to see coal phased out completely, an end to all fossil fuel subsidies and a global coalition to reach net zero by 2050. This scenario requires at the global level that on an average every country (certainly the larger polluters like USA, China, EU, Russia, Brazil, India) has to halve the country level emissions by 2030.
But there is not a single projection or policy of our country which may even remotely indicate that India’s total GHG emissions will be reduced even by 2040/50 (at least, such indications are not visible in the public domain). On the contrary, the draft national energy policy, 2017, had projected that “Energy related emissions per capita will increase from 1.2 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent/capita in 2012 to 2.7-3.5 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent/capita in 2040.”
For a population of about 1.35 billion, which is expected to reach about 1.5 billion by 2050, such a projection shall mean that the total GHG emissions of the country can be about 2.0 - 3.0 times more than what it was at 2012. It is safe to state that there is no single economic policy indication on the horizon that in a business as usual (BAU) scenario, the total GHG emissions of the country by 2030/40 will be anything less than that in 2012.
In view of the fact that since this draft national energy policy has not been finalised yet with modified projections, or since there are no policy statements to show that the consumption of fossil fuels will be considerably reduced by 2040/50, it is but natural to project that India’s total GHG emissions will not be consistent with the global requirement. India can be said to have failed to seriously consider an economy-wide-net-zero target, which will be a major concern very soon in the international arena.
India’s total GHG emissions is already the third largest, and with the same growth trajectory and because of its vastly growing population, India can soon become the second largest emitter after China in the context of total GHG emissions. Such a scenario can neither be in the interest of global efforts in combating climate change, nor in the true interest of our own communities; because such a vast level of GHG emissions at the country level should also clearly indicate the alarmingly deteriorated status of natural resources, on which our communities depend so much for their day-to-day needs.
There is no single economic policy indication on the horizon suggesting total GHG emissions of the country will go down by 2030/40
There will also be massive international pressure on India to reduce its carbon footprint, and in such a scenario the country will be forced to take drastic, urgent, and unpopular measures to reduce its total GHG emissions, which will bring enormous misery to our people. Hence, there is a critical need for the country to gradually but resolutely move away from coal/fossil fuel reliance as early as feasible, and to take the stakeholders into confidence on all the associated policy implementation measures.
In this context, it can be safely stated that even if our political leaders refuse to objectively consider safeguarding the true welfare of our communities from the looming threats of climate change, India cannot afford to continue to ignore the consequences of enormous pressure from the international community w.r.t our GHG emissions.
The above mentioned concerns of the people are supported by the relevant provisions of our Constitution:
(i) as per the sections 48 (a) and 51 (a) (g) of our Constitution it is the duty of the STATE and every citizen to make honest efforts to protect and improve our environment by protecting and improving rivers, lakes, forests and living beings;
(ii) the letter and spirit of the water Act of 1974 and the Air Act 1981 are hard to notice in their compliance in the power sector;
(iii) even if we consider the relevant Acts of the Parliament pertaining to the electricity sector in isolation of the other sectors of our economy, it is almost impossible to notice the compliance of the letter and spirit of Indian Electricity Act 2003, and National Electricity Policy as far as salient features such as efficiency, economy, responsible use of natural resources, consumer interest protection, reliable supply of electricity, protection of environment are concerned.
The various associated concerns expressed by some of the leaders of our country such as yourself, the Vice Chairman of NITI Aayog, and some of the Union ministers, while also advocating an early move for our country from the existing over reliance on coal power to a green energy-based economy, may not lead to any discernible action at the national level because of the continued reluctance/ insensitivity of the government to objectively consider such advises.
Many representations to the Union government. in this regard have not evoked any response so far. It is becoming increasingly evident that the looming and dire consequences of the fast-deteriorating environmental conditions in the country can be satisfactorily addressed if and only if the hon’ble SC of India intervenes urgently so as to make the government take adequate and urgent actions to minimise the GHG emissions as required by the UN.
In this larger context, may I request that this email appeal may kindly be treated as a public interest litigation, and that the Union government be asked to declare climate emergency as called for by the UN Secretary General, and also to implement adequate policy measures to minimise the total GHG emissions in the country, thereby also protecting the natural resources in the country?

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Did Netaji turn blind eye to Japanese massacre while in Andaman during World War-II?

Dr Diwan Singh Kalepani museum off Chandigarh By Rajiv Shah  Did Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose ignore the massacre carried out by the Japanese army in Andaman and Nicobar islands during the Second World War? It would seem so, if one goes by the account of Mohinder Singh Dhillon, who authored a book in memory of his father, 'A Titan in the Andamans, Dr Diwan Singh Kalepani'. Dr Diwan Singh was tortured to death by the Japanese soldiers in the cellular jail in Andaman in 1944.

A golden goose, GoI bent on selling LIC 'for pittance' without consulting stakeholders

By Thomas Franco*  In spite of strong opposition from all sections of the society, the Finance Minister (FM) recently asked her Ministries to speed up Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) Initial Public Offer (IPO). Does she realise that this can lead to collapse of the economy over a period of time because LIC is a golden goose which is giving golden eggs regularly to the economy, development projects and providing social security to the majority of the marginalised people of this country.

Sweden-backed study: India won't achieve 2030 UN goals, officials can't recognise SDG

By Rajiv Shah  A Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC)-sponsored study, carried out by the advocacy group Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS) India, seeking to analyse the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No 12, Responsible Consumption and Production (RCP), has regretted, it is "very unlikely" India will achieve any of the targets of SDG 12 by 2030 "unless some serious measures are taken by the government to reverse the present trend."

Modi's Gujarat 'ignores' India's biggest donor of Azad Hind Fauj, Dhoraji's Habib Sheth

By Dr Hari Desai* One surely feels happy that the statue of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose is being installed near the India Gate in New Delhi. Every Indian and even Netaji’s 79-year-old daughter Prof Anita Bose Pfaff feels happy about the statue at the most important area of the capital. In an interview with an Indian TV, Anita, who is a German citizen, mentions that she thinks if not Netaji’s only Mahatma Gandhi’s statue should have been there. She may be aware that there existed a plan to install life-sized statue of the Father of the Nation at that place.  Even after differences with Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Patel which led Netaji to leave the Indian National Congress, Bose was the first person to call Mahtma Gandhi Father of the Nation on July 6,1944 in his Ragoon Radio broadcast, and sought Bapu’s blessings as the Supreme Commander of the Indian National Army (INA). Till 1968 there was statue of King George V at India Gate. It was removed and placed in the Coronation Park, New Del

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Why Church in India today needs a Rutilio Grande, martyred for stance on social justice

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  For the people of El Salvador, January 22, 2022 will be more than just a red-letter day. Three of their sons, Jesuit Fr Rutilio Grande and his two lay associates 72-year-old Manuel Solorzano and 15-year-old Nelson Rutilio Lemus (and Italian Franciscan missionary Fr Cosme Spessotto who was also martyred) will be beatified in San Salvador.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Dargah site was a temple': Claim in Gujarat following post-Babri verdict demands in UP

By Rajiv Shah  Will Gujarat also see demands to replace mosques and dargahs with Hindu temples? It would seem so, if a new fact-finding team conclusion is any indication. Apprehending the “danger” of communal conflagration, it has cited the claim on a 15th century dargah was originally a Hindu temple – allegedly quite on line with what has been happening in UP following the Supreme Court verdict on Babri Mosque.

Is it time to celebrate India's 'improved' sex ratio? Reasons to question NFHS data

By Aditi Chaudhary*  The recently published National Family Health Survey (NFHS) factsheet brought cheers amongst the public and the government. With Child Sex ratio (number of females per 1000 males in the age group 0 - 6 years) and overall sex ratio (the total number of females per 1000 males), both showing an improvement, NFHS-5 (2019-21) got applauded by all around.