Skip to main content

Evading federalism: Centre 'bracketed' farm laws under Union list's Trade and Commerce

Counterview Desk

The virtual Kisan Sansad, a civil society initiative held on January 23 and 24, 2021 at the Guru Teg Bahadur Memorial at Singhu, Delhi, has demanded the repeal of the three central farm laws, legalisation of minimum support price (MSP), and condemned the government’s “repression” of the farmer protests.
Participated by senior politicians from across the country, including past and present members of Parliament and MLAs, farmers’ leaders, academics, former civil servants, ex-justices, and well-known social activists, it saw speakers point towards how the three laws would pose a threat to farmers and food security.
Speakers said, the three laws were aimed at dismantling the public distribution system currently in place in order to replace it with cash transfer, even as underlining these were passed violating the Constitution’s federal structure. According to them, these were meant to please a few private companies. 

Text of the three resolutions: 

Legalising minimum support price

The National Commission on Farmers, better known as the Swaminathan Committee after its Chairperson Professor MS Swaminathan, recommended about 15 years ago in its report that farmers should receive a margin of 50% for their produce over and above their cost of cultivation. Political parties of different leanings have promised this in their manifestoes and even formed governments since then but this is yet to be implemented.
The current ruling dispensation at the centre has incorrectly claimed that it has implemented this by not calculating the cost of cultivation as recommended in the Swaminathan Committee report. Farmers in India have been agitating for months in their states and for around two months now in Delhi and one of their demands is to have a minimum remunerative price for their produce. They are demanding that the government provide a legal guarantee for a Minimum Support Price (MSP).
In solidarity with the farmers of India, this Kisan Sansad resolves that farmers must be guaranteed MSP in law and a guaranteed procurement of the notified crops at this MSP. The Sansad demands that the government immediately accepts this demand of the farmers in principle and form a suitable committee to recommend how this policy can be enacted in law and draft a bill which may then be placed before Parliament for deliberation and passing within a fixed timeframe, preferably in the next monsoon session to enable the farmers to benefit from this kharif harvest itself.

Government repression of the kisan aandolan

For several months, farmers across the country have been agitating against the three farm laws brought by the government and for getting a fair MSP for their crops. Lakhs of them have been living on the streets on the borders of Delhi since they were prevented from entering Delhi where they wanted to sit and peacefully register their protest against the laws. The government used water cannons, tear gas shells, dug deep trenches and put sand filled containers and trucks in the way to prevent them from entering Delhi. 
Many ministers of this government and spokesmen of the BJP along with their lapdog media have abused the protesting farmers and accused them of being Kalistanis, terrorists and in the pay of Pakistan and China. After a long and tortuous negotiation the government was forced to let the farmers organise their own Republic Day Tractor Parade in Delhi.
The sansad condemns the repression, disinformation and false accusations hurled upon the protesting farmers by the government and lapdog media and its insensitivity to the exemplary and peaceful protests in the harsh cold and rain in which over 150 farmers have already died. The sansad expresses its satisfaction that the government has finally realized the folly of not allowing the farmers to take out a tractor parade on Republic Day in Delhi. 
Kisan Sansad resolved that farmers must be guaranteed MSP in law and a guaranteed procurement of the notified crops at this MSP
But it condemns the government of Uttar Pradesh where farmers are not being allowed to participate in protests. The sansad salutes the resolute spirit that the farmers have displayed in protesting at the borders of Delhi and the remarkable organisation and spirit of service and solidarity that has been displayed by the farmers.

Repeal of three farm Acts

The Kisan Sansad demands full repeal of three recently passed agriculture related acts: Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020, Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020, and Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020. The demand for repeal of these Acts is in support of and in agreement with the demands of the agitating farmers across the country because:
  1. These three Acts seek to alter the legal architecture of Indian agriculture to the detriment of the farmers. These acts would together give unregulated freedom to corporate and agri-businesses at the expense of crores of small and marginal farmers of India.
  2. The passage of these acts did not involve any pre or post legislative consultation with the principal stake-holders, the farmers. Farmers must be taken into confidence before a government seeks to alter the conditions of their life and livelihood. No draft bill was circulated for public comments as required by the rules. The bills were not referred to a standing committee or even properly voted on in the Rajya Sabha but were rushed through parliament in violation of parliamentary procedure. 
  3. ‘Agriculture’ and ‘markets’ are State subjects under the Constitution, and through these Acts, the Centre is blatantly encroaching into the domain of the State governments. The Centre is using the item "trade and commerce" under the Union List to justify these Central Acts, but farmers contend that it is ‘Markets’ that are being directly and drastically affected by the laws. 
  4. Any amendments to these laws as is being proposed by the government will continue to keep the Acts alive, allowing the government to pass executive orders that might once again weaken the position/protection of farmers’ interests. 
In light of this, the governments offer of suspending the laws for one and a half years makes no sense since that would also have to be done through legislation. Since the government seems committed to making amendments in the laws after consultation with farmer’s organisations, there is no reason not to repeal the laws and then bring in laws in the interests of farmers, afresh, after full consideration and consultation.
The government seems to be standing only on ego and prestige. The sansad therefore resolves that the three farm laws be immediately withdrawn through appropriate ordinance/legislation.

Comments

TRENDING

What's Bill Gates up to? Have 'irregularities' found in funding HPV vaccine trials faded?

By Colin Gonsalves*  After having read the 72nd report of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on alleged irregularities in the conduct of studies using HPV vaccines by PATH in India, it was startling to see Bill Gates bobbing his head up and down and smiling ingratiatingly on prime time television while the Prime Minister lectured him in Hindi on his plans for the country. 

Displaced from Bangladesh, Buddhist, Hindu groups without citizenship in Arunachal

By Sharma Lohit  Buddhist Chakma and Hindu Hajongs were settled in the 1960s in parts of Changlang and Papum Pare district of Arunachal Pradesh after they had fled Chittagong Hill Tracts of present Bangladesh following an ethnic clash and a dam disaster. Their original population was around 5,000, but at present, it is said to be close to one lakh.

Muted profit margins, moderate increase in costs and sales: IIM-A survey of 1000 cos

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad’s (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES) has said that the cost perceptions data obtained from India’s business executives suggests that there is “mild increase in cost pressures”.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Govt putting India's professionals, skilled, unskilled labour 'at mercy of' big business

By Thomas Franco, Dinesh Abrol*  As it is impossible to refute the report of the International Labour Organisation, Chief Economic Advisor Anantha Nageswaran recently said that the government cannot solve all social, economic problems like unemployment and social security. He blamed the youth for not acquiring enough skills to get employment. Then can’t the people ask, ‘Why do we have a government? Is it not the government’s responsibility to provide adequate employment to its citizens?’

Anti-Rupala Rajputs 'have no support' of numerically strong Kshatriya communities

By Rajiv Shah  Personally, I have no love lost for Purshottam Rupala, though I have known him ever since I was posted as the Times of India representative in Gandhinagar in 1997, from where I was supposed to do political reporting. In news after he made the statement that 'maharajas' succumbed to foreign rulers, including the British, and even married off their daughters them, there have been large Rajput rallies against him for “insulting” the community.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

Youth as game changers in Lok Sabha polls? Young voter registration 'is so very low'

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Young voters will be the game changers in 2024. Do they realise this? Does it matter to them? If it does, what they should/must vote for? India’s population of nearly 1.3 billion has about one-fifth 19.1% as youth. With 66% of its population (808 million) below the age of 35, India has the world's largest youth population. Among them, less than 40% of those who turned 18 or 19 have registered themselves for 2024 election. According to the Election Commission of India (ECI), just above 1.8 crore new voters (18-and 19-year-olds) are on the electoral rolls/registration out of the total projected 4.9 crore new voters in this age group.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.