Skip to main content

Love jihad law: Why no focus on violence on women in UP, India's 'rape capital'?

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey, Kushagra Kumar*

The Uttar Pradesh government recently promulgated the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion Of Religion Ordinance, 2020 which is being described as a law to curb ‘love-jihad’ – to check Muslim men marrying Hindu women with the intent to convert them. The law is also supposed to check mass religious conversions.
According to the National Family Health Survey there are only 2.5% inter-religious marriages in India and only 4.5 % Muslim men marry women belonging to other faith. Recently a special investigation was launched by UP police in Kanpur in the matters of love-jihad, i.e., cases of Hindu women lured or forced into relationship with Muslim men.
Among the 22 police stations of Kanpur 14 such cases were found. Upon investigation in 8 of these the women clearly stated that they had entered the relationship on their own free will. This is good evidence that the propaganda of ‘love-jihad,’ Muslim men enticing Hindu women with a view to convert them to Islam so that eventually Muslims outnumber Hindus, does not hold much water. Neither are mass conversions such frequent or large-scale events that they are of any consequence.
A recent High Court, Allahabad, judgment said, “To disregard the choice of a person who is of the age of majority would not only be antithetic to the freedom of choice of a grown-up individual but would also be a threat to the concept of unity in diversity.”
According to the National Crime Record Bureau’s 2019 report, out of 4,05,861 cases of crimes against women in the country, UP had the most number of 59,853 cases. 30.9% of these cases under the Indian Penal Code were registered under ‘cruelty by husband or his relatives’ and 21.8% cases were ‘assault on women with intent to outrage her modesty,’ and 17.9% were ‘kidnapping and abduction of women.’
The entire country was stirred by the Hathras gang rape and murder of 19 years old Dalit woman in September, 2020. Had it not been for the Central Bureau of Investigation, the UP police had almost botched up the case. Shamefully, they denied the burial rights to the family, for which nobody has been held accountable till date.
Two weeks after the gang rape and death of Hathras victim on September 29, UP was rocked by a series of rape incidents. On September 29 itself a 22 years old Dalit BCom student was gang raped, brutalized and killed in Gaisari village of Balrampur district, The same day a 14 years old was raped by a 20 years old neighbor in Bulandshahr. 
A High Court judge’s remark that religious conversion for the purpose of marriage was unacceptable came in handy for Yogi
On September 30 an eight years old girl was raped by a 20 years old man in Jiyanpur, Azamgarh district. On October 7 a five years old girl was raped by her uncle in Hazratpur, Badaun district. On 28 October another 5 years old girl was raped by a teenager in Banda. So much so, the UP began to be described as rape capital of country.
This is when a High Court judge’s remark that religious conversion for the purpose of marriage was unacceptable came in handy for the Chief Minister and in an election rally in Jaunpur on October 31, Yogi Adityanath declared that his government will bring strict law to curb love-jihad. 
He did not stop at that and issued a warning that if the people who conceal their identity and play with the respect of women from different community don’t mend their ways then their ‘Ram nam satya’ journey will begin. Advisors of the CM ought to tell him that it doesn’t behoove his office to issue death threats like this from public platforms.
But this is not the first time he has done it. Earlier he has openly claimed that criminals will face a ‘thok do’ policy of the state. Courts ought to take suo-moto notice of such statements which make it appear that the head of executive is taking law in his own hand.
This changed the narrative from criticism of UP government on crime against women to one about love-jihad. Media was too happy to go along with the government’s narrative for its own vested interest. It is not as if crimes against women have subsided. 
  • An accused out on bail, abducted, raped and killed a seven years old girl in Sant Kabir Nagar district on November 4.
  • On November 26, a madrasa teacher gave sedative to a 15 years old girl at her home while her mother had gone to the market and tried to rape her in Shivratanganj, Amethi district. The teacher was booked under relevant sections of IPC and the Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences Act. 
  • An eight years old girl was raped and strangled to death on November 26 when she had gone to collect the wood in Mathura district. Her body was found next morning. 
  • A 35 years old widow in Shahjahanpur district has claimed that she was gang raped on November 30 by 5 men who abducted her and then when she went to lodge a complaint at the Jalalabad police station she was sexually assaulted by a sub-inspector. 
  • An 18 years old woman who was kidnapped and raped in 2019 was kidnapped again on November 30, 2020, while she had gone to the fields. All the three accused in 2019 case are out on bail. Woman’s father filed a complaint against 7 people this time. 
  • On December 11, a seven years old girl was raped by two men in Budhana police station area of Muzaffarnagar district. She was found unconscious and bleeding on the roof of a nearby house. Case under IPC 376D and POCSP has been registered against the two. 
  • A 10 years old girl was raped on 14 December in Jarsana, Firozabad district by a 20 years old man from the same village when returning home after attending a party. 
However, nobody seems to question why the attention has shifted from tens of thousands of crimes against women, including domestic violence cases in marriages involving same caste and religion couples, to merely tens of incidents of inter-religious marriages or relationships most of which are anyway legally and Constitutionally valid.
---
*Arundhati Dhuru is national convenor, National Alliance of People’s Movements; Sandeep Pandey, a Magsaysay award winning social activist, is vice president, Socialist Party (India); Kushagra Kumar is a student in Lucknow

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.