Skip to main content

Australian govt told to act: Foreign Ministry's India report talks of 'worrisome' trends

Australian high commissioner with RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat
Counterview Desk
Australia based Humanism Project, commenting on a 72-page report released recently by the country’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) on India, has said that the human rights situation portrayed in it a clarion call for the for the “international community to intervene” in view of the details provided in it on “attacks” on “religious minorities, journalists and others who dare to criticize the government have been on the rise.”
In a note on the report, the country’s top advocacy group states, “Using Narendra Modi as its face, the RSS has been attempting to transform this culture into a kind of Hindu nation that is not only at odds with the inclusive Hindu traditions but is also filled with hate and has fascist tendencies”, asking the Australian government and its leaders to “work collaboratively with the international community to take steps to foil these attempts.”

Text:

The state of the nation described in the December 2020 ‘Country Information Report’ on India by Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) is not just worrisome, it further reinforces the concerns the Humanism Project (THP) has been expressing all along. The human rights situation portrayed in India in the DFAT Country Information Report India is a signal that it is time for the international community to intervene.
DFAT report clearly states that attacks in India on religious minorities, journalists and others who dare to criticize the government have been on the rise.
“There has been an increase in targeted attacks against religious minorities in recent years. Some observers claim members of the current government have created a permissive environment for Hindu nationalist groups in India to target minorities and engage in hate-speech,” reads a paragraph under the segment ‘Religion’ of the 72-page report.
DFAT has held organisations linked with the Rashtriya Swaymsevak Sangh (RSS) responsible for these targeted attacks. The report states, “At their foundation, these groups have the objective of organising and consolidating a Hindu society and protecting the Hindu Dharma (the moral precept and code of living that governs duty, religion and law in Hinduism). The RSS movement and its affiliates have been known to work at the grass roots level to organise Hindus and defend their interests. Participants reportedly engage in lessons that prioritise the Hindu way of life.”
“Some RSS affiliates have engaged in militant activities. In 2018, the CIA classified VHP as a militant religious organisation. In 1992, Bajrang Dal participated in the destruction of the Babri Masjid mosque at Ayodhya (see Ayodhya – Babri Mosque and Hindu Temple). For the last 30 years, BD has either been banned or operated on the margins of society. However, since the BJP came to office in 2014, media claims the group has grown more powerful. BD has formed approximately 2,500 cells across India.”
This is the same RSS whose chief Mohan Bhagwat Australia’s High Commissioner to India Barry O’Farrell had paid a visit to, in November 2020, and had sung praises of. In its report, DFAT has described how RSS and other Hindu organisations are involved in the attacks on religious minorities.
“Reported instances of communal tension involving Muslims in recent years, include violence, assaults, riots, religiously motivated killings and discrimination. According to a July 2019 survey by the Pew Research Center, which researched religious restrictions in the 25 most populous countries, India ranked among the top five countries with the highest levels of social hostilities. Hindu nationalist groups, such as the Shiv Sena or the RSS, have been responsible for some incidents, in what some observers claim is a permissive environment (see Hindu nationalist organisations). In March 2019, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights warned India over ‘divisive policies’ and harassment of minorities, particularly Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis.”
In its report, DFAT states that Hindu nationalism in India not only receives unofficial sanction but also encouragement from people who are part of the Indian government.
“Hindu nationalist politics has heightened communal tensions in parts of India in recent years. In this climate, there are higher levels of fear in the Muslim community. The risk of societal discrimination and violence is higher for Muslims who are involved in cow slaughter; however, these incidents, while widely reported, have not affected the day-to-day lives of most Muslims.”
“Observers assess the government has sought to align Indian nationalism with Hindu nationalism. They claim the BJP has benefited politically from some Hindu organisations’ use of violence to polarise the electorate along religious lines. The 2019 USCIRF report – which the Indian Government rejects – claims certain BJP members have affiliations with extremist Hindu groups and have used inflammatory language about religious minorities publicly (see Recent History and Hindu nationalist organisations). This has led to concerns minority rights and religious freedoms are being threatened, and the link between democracy and secularism is being weakened.”
According to DFAT report, religious freedom has suffered a setback in India and attacks by Hindu nationalists, not only on Muslims but also against Christians have increased.
“A rise in Hindu nationalism has coincided with increasing incidents of violence and discrimination against Christians. Christians have increasingly faced poorly founded legal proceedings and police reports, difficulties for churches and NGOs dealing with local government authorities, public statements by officials denigrating Christians, and threats or acts of violence.”
DFAT has described how RSS is involved in the attacks on religious minorities. It's the same organisation Australia’s High Commissioner to India Barry O’Farrell paid a visit to
“A March 2019 Newsweek report claimed that, in 2018, more than 100 churches were shut across Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh, citing building codes and/or panchayat building rules. Newsweek claims the actual number of churches affected is likely higher as figures do not include remote parts of India where records are more difficult to collect.”
Attacks on media and the critics of the government have also been detailed in this report.
“Media reports citing official data claim 332 people were arrested under the sedition law between 2016 and 2018, with seven convicted (suggesting police have struggled to gather evidence against the accused).”
In the report, DFAT has stated that colonial-era sedition laws are being increasingly enforced to silence the critics of the government.
“DFAT assesses people who publicly express views critical of the government face a moderate risk of official discrimination. This may include arrest, harassment and prosecution.”
And, the Indian government has made it difficult for human rights organisations to function in India.
“Sources told DFAT they consider the government has further intensified efforts against NGOs, and there is now a greater use of the Foreign Currency Regulation Act to ‘crack down on the freedom of expression [and] to pursue all forms of dissent’. Civil society claims this has made them less able to hold the state accountable.”
“Those who operate NGOs that are critical of the government or deal with politically sensitive issues face a high risk of official discrimination. This may take the form of monitoring, harassment, raids, or cancellation or denial of funding licences.”
Journalists who openly criticize the government’s policies are potentially in danger, according to DFAT.
“DFAT assesses journalists reporting on politically sensitive issues, such as the CAA or J&K, or those who openly criticise the government and its policies, face a high risk of official discrimination or harassment. At times, harassment can be violent. DFAT assesses journalists reporting on issues that are not deemed to be sensitive face a low level of official and societal violence and discrimination, in the context of a vast and active media industry.”
The report highlights all the concerns that The Humanism Project has been expressing all along before the Australian political leadership and the media.
With the release of this report, it is now becoming clear that it will impact the minds of Indians living in Australia. The Indians in Australia love their country of origin and take pride in India’s culture of inclusiveness and diversity.
However, since the arrival of the Bharatiya Janata Party government in 2014, these traditions and culture have been under constant attack. Using Narendra Modi as its face, the RSS has been attempting to transform this culture into a kind of Hindu nation that is not only at odds with the inclusive Hindu traditions but is also filled with hate and has fascist tendencies.
The Humanism Project voices its strong opposition to these moves and urges the Australian government and its leaders to work collaboratively with the international community to take steps to foil these attempts.
The world still remembers Nazi Germany and the sufferings such regimes can inflict on their own people. With laws like the discriminatory citizenship legislations in 2019 accompanied by the detention centres for those declared ‘illegal’ and the latest ‘love jihad’ laws to regulate inter-faith relationships, the Modi government is putting in place laws and structures that are a grim reminder of those terrible times in Germany before the Second World War.

Comments

GS Ruddin said…
The brain-dead conservative government which goes crazy about China says nothing about the fanatical genocidal regime of Modi and his Nazi loving buddies in the RSS.
No wonder Australia is viewed as a backwater in international affairs with such politically inconsistency and hypocrisy!

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

A 'distorted narrative' of Indian politics: Congress failing to look beyond LS polls

By Prem Singh*  About 15 days ago, I told a senior journalist friend that there are not even two   months left for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi is roaming around on a delectation (tafreeh). The friend probably found my comment exasperating and replied that he is not on a delectation trip. The conversation between us on this topic ended there. 

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.