Skip to main content

A top peace activist, Modi govt 'equated' Navlakha with terrorist Hafiz Sayeed

By Priyanka Preet, Sandeep Pandey, Kushagra Kumar*

Gautam Navlakha is a famed author, civil rights activists, human rights activist, journalist, an Editorial Consultant at the “Economic and Political Weekly”, probably the most internationally well known social sciences journal published out of India, the convenor of the International People’s Tribunal on Human Rights and Justice in Kashmir and the Secretary of the People’s Union for Democratic Rights.
He has been a vocal critic of the Government through his left-wing activism while working in Kashmir and Maoist regions in Chhattisgarh. He has worked for the cause of peace and friendship between India and Pakistan through the forum Pakistan India People’s Forum for Peace and Democracy.
Imagine such a distinguished scholar activist being likened to somebody synonymous with terrorism, Hafiz Sayeed. During a debate in the Rajya Sabha on the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Bill, 2019, which allows an individual to be labeled as a terrorist, former Congress home minister P Chidambaram criticized this as monumental error and asked the government not to compare Hafiz Sayeed with activist Gautam Navlakh. Gautam Navlakha himself criticized the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for being vague and opposed to Constitutional values.
In May 2011, Gautam Navlakha was refused entry at the Srinagar Airport and was compelled to return to Delhi by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir as they believed that his presence could cause a law-and-order problem in Kashmir. Later while addressing a press conference at Srinagar in December 2011 he stated that those in the government responsible for the disappeared persons in Jammu and Kashmir should be brought to book.
It should be a matter of shame for any government that there is an organization by the name of Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons in J&K formed in 1994. The number of disappeared persons since 1989 is put between 8,000 and 10,000.
In the 2018 Bhima Koregaon violence case, Gautam Navlakha was named an accused and his anticipatory bail pleas were rejected by the Supreme Court on 8 April 2020, under the UAPA. The Bhima Koregaon violence case was transferred by the Bharatiya Janata Party led union government from the Pune Police to the National Investigation Agency in January 2020.
The wisdom of this move has been questioned as this was done after the BJP lost election in Maharashtra and Shiv Sena led government came to power and there was a possibility that the new government would take a fresh look at the Bhima Koregaon case through a Special Investigation Team. On April 14, 2020, Gautam surrendered before the NIA after the Supreme Court refused to extend his plea in light of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The NIA has accused Gautam Navlakha of having attended conferences in the United States organized by Pakistani Kashmiri separatist Syed Ghulam Nabi Fai, who was arrested by Federal Bureau of Investigation and sentenced to a two year term in 2011. US Attorney Neil H MacBride had claimed in an affidavit that Gautam Navlakha was introduced by Fai to an Inter-Services Intelligence General for recruitment at the agency’s direction.
Whereas these allegations remain to be substantiated, meeting people and attending conferences can itself not be considered a crime. NIA has not produced any concrete evidence of Gautam Navlakha having been engaged in any anti-national activity or committed an act of crime. Since Gautam was the only one among the Bhima Koregaon violence accused who worked extensively on the issue of Kashmir, NIA found it convenient to make him a scapegoat in a desperate attempt to demonstrate a link between the terrorists and Maoists.
Gautam Navlakha has taken brave position on right to self-determination for people of J&K and has been made to pay a price for that
Gautam Navlakha has taken a brave position in support of right to self-determination for the people of J&K and has been made to pay a price for that. For a similar position taken by Advocate Prashant Bhushan during the anti-corruption movement led by Anna Hazare, he was thrashed by some right wing goons in his SC chamber.
NIA has alleged that Gautam Navlakha indulged in secret communications with banned Communist Party of India (Maoist) members and was assigned the task of mobilizing intellectuals against the government as well as to recruit cadres for guerrilla activities. According to NIA the violence at Bhima Koregaon was pre-planned.
The fact of the matter is that the First Information Report filed on the day after the violence occurred on January 1, 2018, was against two Hindutva activists Sambhaji Bhide and Milind Ekbote. It beats logic why should supporters of the Elgar Parishad, the banner under which the Bhima Koregaon event was organized by two distinguished retired Justices of Bombay High Court, BG Kolse-Patil and PB Sawant, disrupt their own event using violence?
This is a classic example of how the BJP governments make accused out of victims or their supporters. The same pattern was repeated in anti-Citizenship Amendment Act and National Register for Citizens protests and violence in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. The perpetrators or provocateurs of violence were allowed to roam free and peaceful protestors or victims were made the accused in FIRs.
Gautam is an ageing prisoner whose spectacles, without which he is almost helpless, were stolen in the Taloja Prison in Mumbai on November 27 even as he continues to suffer from several ailments like colonic polyposis, chronic gastritis and high blood pressure. His partner Sahba Hussain sent him a fresh pair of glasses in a parcel which was rejected by the prison authorities on December 5.
The bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik of the Bombay High Court remarked that providing essential items like spectacles to prisoners were ‘humane considerations,’ and added that it is high time to conduct a workshop for even jail authorities. This one incident points to the blatant violations of basic rights of prisoners in Indian jails and also informs us of the inhuman conditions in which they are kept.
Before his surrender Gautam Navlakha wrote about the UAPA: 
“Such Acts turn the normal jurisprudence upside down. No longer is it the axiom that a person is innocent unless proven guilty, In fact under such Acts an accused is guilty unless proven innocent. Draconian provisions of the UAPA are not accompanied by stricter procedures regarding evidence, especially electronic, considering the stringent punishment provided for under the Act; the procedures, which otherwise provide tighter rules regarding evidence, are instead made elastic. Under this double whammy, jail becomes the norm and bail an exception. In this Kafkaesque domain, process itself becomes the punishment.”
---
*Priyanka Preet is a student of BA-LLB (Hons) at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University, Lucknow; Sandeep Pandey, Magsaysay award winning social activist, is vice president of Socialist Party (India); and Kushagra Kumar is a student in Lucknow

Comments

Anonymous said…
What else one can say when a person instigates the people and support all the violent activities. He always make making a mountain out of mole hill. Police excess is true, can apprehend the terrorists' and Maoist with out using force. Has he ever condemned attack on Kashmiri Pandits and the violence that took place in left rules states. No doubt he is intellectual but uses the same against majority a biased man with hatred mindset.

TRENDING

Top upper caste judges 'biased' towards Dalit colleagues: US Bar Association report

By Rajiv Shah  A high profile report prepared by the influential  American Bar Association (ABA) Center for Human Rights , taking note of the fact that “in the 70-year history of the Indian Republic, only six Dalit judges have been appointed to the Supreme Court”, has taken strong exception to what it calls “lack of representation of Dalits” in the legal profession and the judiciary.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Billion vaccine doses? Devil is in details: 70% haven't got 2nd jab; numbers jacked up

By Prof Ujjwal K Chowdhury*  India has reached the one billion Covid-19 vaccinations milestone. It is indeed a great news and a big salute to the less paid ordinary health-workers in interiors of India for this feat. The government wants all of India's 944 million adults to get vaccinated this year. Around three-quarters of adults in the country of 1.3 billion people have had one shot and around 30 percent are fully vaccinated, the government says.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Failure of 'trickle down theory' behind India's poor Global Hunger Index rating

By Dr Gian Singh*  On October 14, 2021, two organisations, Concern Worldwide (An Irish aid agency) and WeltHungerHilfe (a German organization that researches the problem of global hunger), jointly published the Global Hunger Index (GHI) for 2021. These organizations have included 116 countries in the world hunger rankings.

Global Hunger Index: Govt of India response pathetic, 'lacks' scientific empirical evidence

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* Come 16 October – and the world once again focused on the most basic need for a person’s survival: food! The first World Food Day was observed in 1994, to mark the launch of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. Ever since, the day is marked to highlight the need and importance of food security across the world. The significance is accentuated especially in these difficult times like the C-19 povidandemic. The theme for 2021 is ‘Safe Food Now for a Healthier Tomorrow’, emphasising on the various immediate and long-term benefits of consuming safe and healthy food.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Fresh efforts to subsume Buddhism within Hindu fold 'undermining' Ambedkar

By Aviral Anand*  From Yeola in 1935, when Dr Ambedkar announced that he would not die a Hindu, to Nagpur in 1956 when he converted to Buddhism, is a considerable distance in time. But, there was in him a need to make a public announcement in 1935 about moving away from Hinduism. 

March opposes Sabarmati Ashram renovation: 'Mahatmaji had kept open for access to all'

Counterview Desk A Sevagram to Sabarmati march, which began on October 17 from Wardha (Maharashtra) and will end on October 24 in Ahmedabad (Gujarat), has demanded that the Sabarmati Ashram, the government should not impose "the fashion and glitz of a shallow modernity" at the cost of Rs 1,200 crore, in the name of renovating the Ashram founded by Gandhiji.

Nehru legacy? GDP-centric growth has had 'no positive impact' on people's livelihood

By Dr Kamal Nayan Kabra*  Experience has shown that many counties adopt measures to go in for the growth of their GDP, basically in the existing framework, though also going in for, at the same time, new products and technologies and similar other changes. It is believed that by means of this process enough new job opportunities would emerge to meet the economy’s needs both in terms of numbers as also in terms of the requisite remuneration (wages) as also the supplies of the goods and services to maintain the economy on an even keel.