Skip to main content

New Central info commissioner Mahurkar hadn't even applied for post: RTI NGO

Counterview Desk

A Delhi-based Right to Information (RTI) NGO, Satark Nagrik Sangathan (SNS), has taken strong exception to the appointment of Uday Mahurkar as an information commissioner in the Central Information Commission (CIC), stating, while the search committee had shortlisted seven persons for six posts in CIC out of 355 applications it had received in response to an advertisement, Mahurkar had not even applied for the post.
Known to be close to the Sangh Parivar and a resident of Gujarat, Mahurkar has long been a senior journalist with the “India Today” and close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He has authored two books, "Centrestage" (2014) and "Marching with a Billion" (2017), both praising the Modi "model" of governance.  
SNS said in a statement, “One of the shortlisted persons, Uday Mahurkar, had not even applied in response to the advertisement and it is not clear on what basis the committee determined his interest for the post. Finally, he was selected as an information commissioner by the selection committee headed by the PM despite the dissent note given by the leader of the opposition who is also a member of the panel.”

Text:

The Department of Personnel and Training (Do)PT has placed in the public domain files relating to the appointments made in November 2020 of the Chief and three information commissioners of the Central Information Commission (CIC). The Supreme Court, in its judgment in February 2019, had directed public disclosure of records regarding appointment of information commissioners. The records had also been sought under the RTI Act.
The files can be accessed on the DoPT website by choosing the link ‘Important Files of IR Division’ under the ‘RTI’ heading (File No 4/2/2020-IR II at serial number 1 and 2).
Key observations based on perusal of the files:

1. Search Committee acted beyond its mandate: 

As per the records in the files, the process to be followed for selection of information commissioners is as follows:
  • Particulars of interested persons are invited through advertisements
  • Particulars of applicants are tabulated by DoPT and sent to a Search Committee 
  • Names shortlisted are sent to the selection committee, headed by the Prime Minister 
  • Candidates recommended by the Selection Committee are appointed by the President 
It is pertinent to state that there is no provision for constitution of a Search Committee in the RTI Act, 2005 and it is constituted on the approval and directions of the Prime Minister, who is also the chairperson of the selection panel. A perusal of the note from the PMO recording the approval of the PM for setting up the search committee reiterates that it is being constituted “for shortlisting of candidates for the post of Information Commissioners in the Central Information Commission”. The role of the search committee, therefore, is limited to creating a shortlist from among the persons who have applied in response to the advertisement.
355 applications were received in response to the advertisement published by DOPT for the post of upto 6 information commissioners in the CIC. A perusal of the minutes of the meeting of the search committee shows that instead of restricting itself to short listing from among those who had applied, the Search Committee also considered names of other persons as suggested by members of the committee. 
Not only is this beyond the explicit mandate for which the search committee was constituted, it vitiates the whole appointment process by allowing it to be manipulated arbitrarily and opens it up to external influence. The minutes do not document what criteria was used to consider names from outside the list of applicants and is also silent on who all were considered. 
Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury submitted a dissent note  on the arbitrary manner of functioning of the search committee headed by PM
Finally the search committee shortlisted 7 names for 6 vacancies. One of the shortlisted persons, Uday Mahurkar, had not even applied in response to the advertisement and it is not clear on what basis the committee determined his interest for the post. Finally, he was selected as an information commissioner by the Selection Committee headed by the PM despite the dissent note given by the leader of the opposition who is also a member of the panel (see point 3 below).

2. No objective and rational criteria for shortlisting of candidates: 

The Supreme Court, in its judgment in February 2019, had directed that it would be “appropriate for the Search Committee to make the criteria for shortlisting the candidates, public, so that it is ensured that shortlisting is done on the basis of objective and rational criteria.” However, a perusal of the records, including the minutes of the Search Committee meeting, shows that no such objective or rational criteria for shortlisting are recorded in the deliberations. 
The minutes merely state, “After taking into consideration the overall experience profile as well as suitability for the post, the Search Committee shortlisted the following panel (in alphabetical order) for consideration of the Committee constituted under Section 12(3) of the RTI Act for the posts of Information Commissioner in Central Information Commission”.

3. Dissent note by member of the selection panel: 

The selection panel for the appointment of the Chief and information commissioners consists of the Prime Minister (also the chairperson of the committee), a cabinet minister nominated by the PM and the leader of the single largest party in opposition in the Lok Sabha. Amit Shah, Home Minister, was nominated by the PM to be a member of the panel and Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury was part of the committee by virtue of being the leader of the single largest group in opposition.
Chowdhury submitted a 6 page dissent note regarding the search and selection process adopted for the appointment of the Chief and 3 information commissioners. The dissent note raises several key issues, including the arbitrary manner of functioning of the search committee (The dissent note has been extracted from the files and can be accessed here).

4. Persistent failure to fill all vacancies: 

A perusal of the files shows that despite the selection committee headed by the PM being aware of the number of vacancies in the CIC, the committee has persistently failed to fill all vacant spots. At the time of deliberation of these appointments, the post of the Chief and 5 posts of information commissioners were vacant in the CIC. 
As the committee chose an incumbent commissioner for the post of Chief, the vacancies rose to 6. Yet the committee only recommended 3 names for the post of information commissioners leading to 50% of the vacancies remaining unfilled, despite the huge backlog of appeals and complaints in the CIC. 
Currently (as of 30/12/2020), more than 38,000 appeals and complaints are pending in the CIC and it takes around 2 years for a matter to come up for hearing. Further in its December 2019 order, in an application regarding failure of the government to fill vacancies in the CIC (MA 1979 of 2019), the Supreme Court bench headed by CJI Bobde had directed that the process of appointment of information commissioners should be completed within 3 months.

5. Failure to disclose information in a timely manner: 

Prior to these files being made publicly accessible on the DoPT website, the DoPT persistently denied access to information about the composition of the search committee and the name of the Minister nominated by the PM to be a member of the selection panel, despite people seeking this information under the RTI Act. 
In fact, the correspondence from the PMO recording the PM’s approval for initiating the appointment process, the setting up of the search committee and deciding its composition and the nomination of the cabinet minister to the selection panel is marked ‘confidential’! 
In a December 2019 order, the Supreme Court had specifically directed that the names of the members of the Search Committee should be put up on the DoPT website. The failure to disclose information in a timely manner thwarts public scrutiny of the process.

Comments

TRENDING

RSS wanted Constitution 'replaced' by Manusmriti which abused Dalits, women

By Shamsul Islam* The Constituent Assembly of India finalized the Constitution of India on November 26, 1949 which is celebrated as the Constitution Day This Constitution promised new born Indian Republic a polity based on democracy, justice, egalitarianism and rule of law. However, RSS was greatly annoyed. Four days after the historic event of approval of it, the RSS English “Organiser” in an editorial on November 30, 1949, complained:

Pending GoI wage payments to rural labour reach Rs 5,100 crore: NREGA Morcha

By Our Representative  MGNREGA (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act), which is said to have provided a cushion to millions of rural households amidst great economic distress during the Covid-19 pandemic, continues to be bogged with poor implementation, NREGA Sangharsh Morcha has alleged.

Once centres of civilisation, Indian cities turning into 'major cause of concern'

By Soumyadip Chattopadhyay*  Each year, October 31 is celebrated as the World Cities Day. The theme this year was Adapting Cities for Climate Resilience. The Center for Habitat, Urban and Regional Studies, Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), New Delhi, organized a special lecture on city as environment as part of the discussion under the #WebPolicyTalk series on the State of Cities -- #CityConversations.

Nuclear energy 'can't solve' global warming, will 'strain' financial, natural resource

Counterview Desk  Taking strong exception to Rafael Mariano Grossi, Director General, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), who has favoured nuclear energy as a solution to global warning, well-known power and policy analyst Shankar Sharma has said that the IAEA chief's “unsubstantiated advocacy” of nuclear power is associated with “diversion of considerable amounts of scarce resources, both financial as well as natural, of many developing countries, such as India.”

Forget 'bheek', by this logic, Gujarat was free of British rule in 1995, 19 yrs before India

The real freedom fighting brigade By Rajiv Shah  Bollywood actor Kangana Ranaut may have her own reasons to say that India acquired real freedom in May 2014, when Narendra Modi came to occupy India’s seat of power.  There was little to be amused by what she said, for, as many commentators have variously pointed out, her viewpoint was surely based on her little or no knowledge of the history of the Indian freedom movement.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Learning to bridge 'huge chasm' between highly educated, illiterate, badly literate

By Shrey Ostwal, Sandeep Pandey*  The pivotal point of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi’s journey to become Mahatma Gandhi began when his “political guru” – Gopal Krishna Gokhale – advised young Mohandas to travel around India. This rigorous journey was essential for Mohandas to understand his country and countrypersons better if he were to fight the inhumane and unempathetic British regime which had been looting India of its glory for about two centuries then.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Farm laws: Modi has been taking decisions without consulting experts, stakeholders

By Ajit Singh* In a surprise move, the Prime Minister of India in a video message that went live on the occasion of Guru Nanak Jayanti announced to scrap three contentious farm laws in the upcoming winter session of Parliament. These laws were notified in September last year but put on hold due to widespread opposition, especially by farmers from Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana.

Modi withdrew farm laws, but has no word on 'pro-corporate, oppressive' policies

Farmers celebrate withdrawal of three laws By Harsh Thakor  Punjab farmers have no doubt won a historic battle in overpowering the farm laws with the support of the working class, students, youth and intellectuals. Noticeably, the non-sectarian approach of the participating organisations, which confronted Hindutva neo-fascism, Sikh separatist politics and Indian and foreign corporate monopoly, helped in enhancing their striking capacity.