Skip to main content

Covid-19, climate crisis: A double whammy for India's Adivasis and forest dwellers

Women involved in forest protection practice
Counterview Desk
#IAmAClimateWarrior Campaign, a collective initiative of civil society organizations (CSOs) and People's Forum, has showcased here a glimpse of the contribution of Adivasi and forest dwelling communities in climate justice. The testimonies of community members have been taken in order to illustrate how community-led forest protection and ecosystem restoration through their traditional knowledge and practices have helped transformed their areas destroyed by the timber mafias during 1960-80.
While these communities did celebrate the traditional cultural festival Siali Utsavon for five days till the World Environment Day, June 5, the irony is, says a Campaign analysis, that despite being the real guardians of forest and climate warriors, the Adivasi and forest dwelling communities are in danger; in fact, they are in the radar of eviction.
The analysis says that Covid-19 and climate crisis have meant “a double whammy for Adivasi and forest dwelling communities of India”. This is happening, it adds, against backdrop of the Environment Policy discourse and its impact on communities through environment impact assessment (EIA), forest clearance moves and evictions.

Text:

The World Environment Day (June 5, 2020) came at a time when India is severely hit by the Covid-19 crisis with a large population of poor and vulnerable communities getting affected by the outbreak and the unplanned lockdown measures. The Adivasi and forest dwelling communities are among the worst affected due to the spread of disease into tribal areas and a crippling impact of the lockdown on their forest based economy as well as timely implementation of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (FRA).
The Covid-19 response by the Central government has brought in a series of measures by the environment ministry which seek to ease the statutory forest and environmental clearance for mining and extractive projects, thereby indulging in ecocide while we stand at the brink of a climate crisis.

Why Adivasi and forest dwelling communities matter for addressing the climate crisis?

The 2019 IPCC Report on Land had stressed the importance of well-defined land tenure being critical for addressing climate change and identified that in areas where local communities have legally recognised and enforced rights to their forests, both deforestation and carbon emissions were significantly lower compared to areas outside of community forests.
Furthermore, the IPBES Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services 2019 under the Convention of Biodiversity also stated that conservation status in indigenous lands are better than state controlled forests. 
Despite the recognition globally towards granting forest tenure and ownership to indigenous communities to resolve the climate crisis through decentralised governance institutions, the endeavour of the Indian government has been towards granting complete discretion to the Forest department to enclose commons and lands which have FRA claims pending for recognition through Compensatory Afforestation (CA) programs under the CA Fund Act, 2016, an idea which was previously legitimised by the Godavarman case by the Supreme Court of India.
The Ministry of Environment Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has allotted 66,000 crores to the Forest Department across states to carry out compensatory afforestation projects without any compliance to the legal requirement under Forest Rights Act 2006 such as taking consent of the Gram Sabhas and ensuring protection to the individual and community forest rights vested under FRA. 
Several studies have highlighted that the afforestation projects undertaken by the Forest department mostly promote monocultures of teak and eucalyptus rather than indigenous and livelihood generating species. This approach of the MoEFCC in fulfilling India's commitments under the Paris Climate Convention continue to rely heavily on a failed model of plantation which violates rights of forest communities and destroys biodiversity through monocultures. 
By failing to attack the root causes of deforestation and forest land diversion, such an approach focusing on reforesting the commons characterised as forest land and wastelands facilitates inflicting grave forms of environmental injustice towards these forest dwelling communities. 
A tribal seeking to prevent forest fire
Instead of alleviating these concerns during the pandemic with emphasis on enabling rural health professionals and infrastructure as well as sustainable production patterns for greater local autonomy, the Indian government has introduced a set of ecologically destructive policies which will induce upon these communities added burdens of landlessness, displacement and loss of livelihoods. 
The Ministry of Tribal Affairs despite three months since lockdown has not set up a Covid-19 Response Cell within its ministry to alleviate concerns of food security, risk of infection and awareness on Covid-19, direct cash transfers, problem of returnee migrants and quarantine centers, etc. 
However, in several reasons increased discretion has been granted to the Forest Department for demarcating land banks to enact CA policies rather than promote the model of Community Forest Resource (CFR) Right enshrined in the FRA to encourage bottom up conservation policies. 
Instead of encouraging collection of Non Timber Forest Produce and associated livelihoods, the endeavor of the state is to encourage afforestation under CA policies under the supervision of the Forest Department as an avenue to encourage tribal employment.
Although numerous studies have identified the risk that increased deforestation has furthered spread of epidemics and infections in the past in regions inhabited by indigenous communities across the globe, the approach of the MoEFCC to promote rampant deforestation by clearing forest diversions and taking policy decisions allowing opening up forests for mining.
Furthermore, taking advantage of the prohibition of physical distancing and the inability of locals to mobilize against oppressive laws at this juncture, the government is keen on passing the draconian EIA notification, 2020, which has made grant of post facto clearances legal, accorded relaxations in validity period with monetization of offences and reduced the opportunity for participation and consultation of forest dwelling communities by increasing the exemption list of industries from public hearings. 
The MoEFCC has facilitated greater forest clearance during this crisis by diluting norms for several mining companies through Mineral Laws Amendment, 2020, for enabling the ease of doing business, as a response to stimulate the economy in bio-diverse hotspots like Western Ghats, Himalayan region and North east India. Such policies have alienated the concerns of indigenous communities who as ecological stewards have been engaging in local conservation efforts and preventing habitat fragmentation. 
The MoEFCC through the Wildlife Conservation Board has also exacerbated clearances in Protected Areas and restricted access of forest dwellers to these regions in complete violation of Forest Rights Act 2006. This has severely impacted the migratory patterns and livelihood generating capacities of pastoral communities during the time of pandemic.

Unlocking the potential of FRA as an environmental justice paradigm

Echoing this call for effective implementation of FRA to engender environmental justice paradigms for forest dwelling communities numerous climate scientists and organizations have reiterated from time to time [recently 43 organizations across 24 countries] that "the protection of local communities’ rights over forests and land is a crucial weapon in the fight against climate change”. 
MoEFCC through Wildlife Conservation Board has exacerbated clearances in Protected Areas, restricted forest dwellers to these regions
By recognising diversity of tenure, the FRA seeks to reimagine land rights from prism individual subsistence as well as community ownership over commons, the latter especially being beneficial for Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups and pastoral communities who otherwise have low representation and face landlessness. The grant of stable tenure rights also reduces scope of violent land conflicts within and between local communities and the state. 
The vast potential CFR under FRA could be utilized to facilitate India's NDC obligations under the Paris Convention by promoting community led eco-restoration at a large scale. Thus, Forest Right Act 2006 represents a tangible tool to support communities in mitigating the effects of climate change as well as instill a model of democratic governance and accountability through the Gram Sabha.
Display of minor forest produce during an annual Adivasi gathering
By enabling greater representation for women within its institutional structure, the Forest Rights Act 2006 also facilitates women empowerment by making them equal stakeholders in decision making through the Gram Sabha. Such a paradigm of autonomous governance through Forest Rights Act 2006 can also enable greater integration of existing social welfare schemes like MGNREGA to develop sustainable livelihoods as well as explore remedying the concerns around food security by allowing local control over produce from forests to meet the nutritional demands of these communities and make them less prone to hunger and starvation. 
By interlinking these paradigms around security of tenure, local governance and autonomous decision making through the FRA provides for a bottom up approach for India to fulfil the Sustainable Development Goals (2015-30) set forth as aspiration in the coming decade. 
Thus, by framing the Climate crisis response from an environmental justice and rights paradigm to achieve sustainable development, India can adhere to its international commitments under the UN Framework Convention for Climate Change, Convention on Biological Diversity, UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, UN Convention on Combating Desertification, etc.

How to amplify these voices belonging to the forests

From June 1, 2020 to June 5, 2020, an online campaign with #IAmAClimateWarrior was run as a collective initiative of civil society organisations and Peoples’ Forum. This platform was created to directly enable the voices of adivasis and forest dwelling communities by highlighting the grave environmental injustices they face despite engaging in community led conservation through traditional knowledge and practices since time immemorial. 
As envisioned in the bottom up model of democratic governance during the enactment of FRA, it is crucial that government of India recognise the voices of these stewards of forest conservation and facilitate for effective implementation of FRA to foster autonomous decision making for ecological concerns and develop capabilities to generate self-sustaining livelihoods. A glimpse of four instances of grassroots oriented and localised models of conservation practices inculcated by forest dwellers through participative exercises is added here to supplement this claim.
Testimony 1: Jayden Naik from Basantpur in Nayagarh District, Odisha has highlighted about how forest dwellers of three villages - Akhupadar, Lakhapada & Basantpur – took the decision to undertake eco-restoration practices and collect minor forest produce by forming a collective forest production and management strategy to prevent instances of encroachment on forests by the timber mafia since 1980s. He exuberates with great pride and further states:
“We called for a Joint Village Meeting at Chandijhar, where we collectively decided that we won't allow any outsiders to enter forest & destroy it. We decided that we will access forest produce only as per our need."
By bestowing upon two families the duty to patrol forests, a practice they refer to as ‘Thengapali’, their indigenous conservation strategies have not only facilitated in enabling the prosperity of biodiversity and wildlife in the region but also positively impacted in enabling steady flow of water in the rivulets within these forests, which can be used by these communities to practice stable agriculture without the need for artificial irrigation practices.
Testimony 2: Namajini Malik from Budhabyapari village in Brahmanbadi GP, Kandhamal District, Odisha has shared about the need to pass on indigenous knowledge on forest conservation practices has been engrained in how their ancestors too protected nature by forming collective groups. 
Their panchayat level MFP collective has not only been efficient in ensuring food security through organised collection practices but also had foresight to follow traditional practices to prevent instances such as forest fires, which usually Forest Department only reacts to rather than adopting precautionary principle towards conservation of forests. Enumerating about their annual tradition, she adds:
“Every year, in month of May, we go to our forest to prevent forest fires with sickles to clean dry leaves & make lines in the forest. We go for forest patrolling to prevent the outsiders from lighting fire in the forest. If the forest burns, Our life and livelihood will be destroyed.” 
Adivasis who gave their testimony
Testimony 3: Paramanda Sahoo, President of Anchalika Janakalyan Committee, Ranpur, Nayagarh district, Odisha has highlighted to prevent famine in the region, forest dwellers from ten neighbouring villages decided to organise themselves to form a community led forest protection collective in 1982. 
With the participation from around 700 households, over the last 38 years by adopting the Thengapali practice, these communities have managed to revive many parts of the forest which were once barren and prone to soil erosion due to irregular rainfall severely depleting the capacity to practice agriculture owing to accumulation of sand deposits. He states:
“Later on, we started contribution from Re 1 which each household must pay as wages to those who were taking turns to protect the forest. Now, we take Rs 30 contribution from each household."
By adopting this self-sustaining income generation technique within the communities, by incentivizing conservation many benefits such as revival of forest cover, reduced instances of soil erosion and deposition, increased tree diversity, safeguarded the presence of 5-7 generations old trees, rejuvenation of 5-7 running streams and increased wildlife in the region.
Testimony 4: Nisha Pradhan (Kondh Tribe), Member of Women Led Forest Protection Committee, Dhengajhari Village, Ranpur Block, Nayagarh Odisha. The Testimony by Nish Pradhan illustrates their spiritual and cultural relationship with forest and Nature. She talks about Siali Utsav their traditional festival to offer thanksgiving and praying to the Siali Tree. She explains how and why they celebrate Siali Utsav:
"Once there was Scarcity of Siali leave in our forest, we could not find Siali tree and leave. Our livelihood was halted, we could not stitch Siali leaf plate for cultural and livelihood purpose. It was then, we prayed to Siali tree. We covered the Siali seeds with cow dung and planted the Siali seeds near the streams and all over the forest. As as result, there was abundance of Siali tree and leaves next year. Since then, Every year we celebrate Siali Utsav to thank Siali tree and leaves for taking care of us & securing our livelihood."
Thus, for the communities members, their forest and nature is above materialistic gains, it is their identity and source of livelihood.
These testimonies highlight a greater need for recognition of traditional yet participatory mechanisms of forest protection by communities across several generations and hence the need to engender the FRA as a paradigm to promote conservation efforts to envision a model of climate justice from below, especially by utilizing the CFR right as an operative technique to realise this aspiration.

Recommendations by members of forest rights campaign groups

Thus, the forest rights campaign groups believe it is crucial to draw this link between secure rights of forest dwellers as key to mitigate climate crisis and recommend that the Government of India as a response to this global pandemic ensure:
  1. Effective Implementation of FRA to facilitate greater recognition of land and community forest rights and thereby undo the historical injustice which these forest dwellers have faced due to lack of tenure security.
  2. Facilitating democratic potential of Gram Sabha by recognising Community Forest Resource right under the FRA as the cornerstone for decentralised and autonomous decision to achieve sustainable development from below. 
  3. Disbursement of CAMPA funds to Gram Sabhas rather than the Forest Department to strengthen and incentivise the potential of community conservation efforts to mitigate the climate crisis. 
  4. Withdrawal of draconian EIA Amendment 2020 and all other policy measures taken during lockdown which violate Forest Rights Act 2006, PESA and constitutional rights of Adivasi and forest dwelling communities.

Comments

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

RSS' 25,000 Shishu Mandirs 'follow' factory school model of Christian missionaries

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
The executive committee of the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (IUAES) recently decided to drop the KISS University in Odisha as the co-host of the World Anthropology Congress-2023. The decision is driven by the argument that KISS University is a factory school.

India must recognise: 4,085 km Himalayan borders are with Tibet, not China

By Tenzin Tsundue, Sandeep Pandey*
There has as been a cancerous wound around India’s Himalayan neck ever since India's humiliating defeat during the Chinese invasion of India in 1962. The recent Galwan Valley massacre has only added salt to the wound. It has come to this because, when China invaded the neighbouring country Tibet in 1950, India was in high romance with the newly-established communist regime under Mao Zedong after a bloody revolution.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Time to give Covid burial, not suspend, World Bank's 'flawed' Doing Business ranking

By Maju Varghese*
On August 27, the World Bank came out with a statement suspending the Doing Business Report. The statement said that a number of irregularities have been reported regarding changes to the data in the Doing Business 2018 and Doing Business 2020 reports, published in October 2017 and 2019. The changes in the data were inconsistent with the Doing Business methodology.

Delhi riots: Cops summoning, grilling, intimidating young to give 'false' evidence

Counterview Desk
More than 440 concerned citizens have supported the statement issued by well-known bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander ‘We will not be silenced’ which said that the communal riots in Delhi in February 2020 have not been caused by any conspiracy, as alleged by the Delhi Police, but by “hate speech and provocative statements made by a number of political leaders of the ruling party.”

WHO chief ignores India, cites Pak as one of 7 top examples in fight against Covid-19

By Our Representative
In a move that would cause consternation in India’s top policy makers in the Modi government, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) director-general, has singled out Pakistan among seven countries that have set “examples” in investing in a healthier and safer future in order to fight the Covid-19 pandemic.

Agricultural reform? Small farmers will be more vulnerable, corporates to 'fix' price

By Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
Agriculture employs 42% of the total work force whereas it contributes only 16% to the country’s GDP. The average annual growth rate in agriculture has remained static to 2.9% since the last six years. This means that the post-green revolution conventional agriculture has reached its peak. Responsiveness of soil fertility to fertiliser application, an indicator of stagnancy in agriculture, shows declining trend since 1970. The worst sufferer has been the small and marginal farmers who constitute 86% of total farmers.

Tata Mundra: NGOs worry as US court rules World Bank can't be sued for 'damages'

By Kate Fried, Mir Jalal*
On August 24 evening, a federal court ruled that the World Bank Group cannot be sued for any damage caused by its lending, despite last year’s Supreme Court ruling in the same case that these institutions can be sued for their “commercial activity” in the United States.