Skip to main content

Migrants crisis: Govt of India 'appears keen' to supply of cheap labour to industry

Counterview Desk
The Government of India (GoI) continues to be immune to the issues and needs of migrants, the civil rights organization Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha has argued in a statement, underlining, it appears to be acting in such a way that the supply of cheap labour to industries remains intact against their wishes and rights.
Jharkhand is one of the major states from where workers go to “developed” in western and south India states in search of work.
Suggesting GoI’s intention appeared clear when these workers were made to pay for their own rail ticket plus Rs 50 if they wish to return, the statement says, this shows it providing to be “one of the biggest impediments” in ensuring their safe return to villages.

Text:

The sudden lockdown imposed on March 25 brought extreme misery to lakhs of Jharkhandi workers stranded in different places across the country. Most of them have not been paid wages by their companies or contractors. Even for getting ration and food, they had to seek support from one and all. Most of them are living in cramped up spaces, with little or no money and inadequate food supplies.
The central government continues to be immune to their issues and needs. Neither did it provide any income support nor did it ensure their food. The central government also expects these workers to pay for their own ticket fare, as per the order issued on May 2. The railway ministry further announced that travellers would have to pay an additional charge of Rs 50!
The central government is acting as one of the biggest impediments in ensuring the workers’ main demand – to get them back to their villages. After allowing their inter-state movement on April 29, the government shamelessly issued a clarification on May 3 that effectively meant that workers were not allowed to travel back to their states. It seems, the government wants to ensure supply of cheap labour to industries against the wishes and rights of the workers.
There is also lack of clarity at Jharkhand government’s end on how to bring the workers back. Meanwhile, Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha and other civil society groups have been constantly raising the issues of workers on different platforms. In the backdrop of all of this, the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha puts forth the following demands:

From the central government:

  1. Central government must immediately withdraw both the orders and take full responsibility of inter-state movements of workers, pay travel fare and ensure free travel and food of workers back to their native states. The government should further ensure that private travel operators do not exploit the workers.
  2. Workers must not be forced, in any way, to stay at their workplace against their will. 
  3. Workers must get at least the half of minimum wages, as per 7th pay commission recommendations, as an income grant for next three months. 
  4. To ensure adequate employment to all the workers in their native states, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) budget must be increased and urban employment guarantee act to be notified. 

From the Jharkhand government:

  1. The government must immediately notify a clear protocol for getting the stranded workers back – it must be clearly stated where the workers may register, timeline for movement etc. In addition to online registration, registration through call centre and offline modes through respective state governments must be made available.
  2. For those travelling from neighbouring areas and for intra-state travel, state government must bear the full travel and food expenses. 
  3. Rather than extending the lockdown indefinitely, Jharkhand government must test all the workers and isolate, if necessary. Panchayat and grams sabhas should be provided with all facilities and provisions to observe all rules of home quarantine or observed quarantine. 
  4. Jharkhand government must provide the grant of Rs 2,000 to all workers, as promised, within a week. 
  5. All returning workers must be registered under MGNREGA and adequate number of labour-intensive schemes should be started in all villages. Government must encourage farming and work towards improving irrigation facilities. It must encourage and incentivize cooperative farming and community ownership of land and natural resources amongst the workers.

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

A locked up offer? Govt of India 'not serious' in involving NGOs: IIM-A survey

By Rajiv Shah
Was the Government of India serious when it asked 92,000 civil society organizations (CSOs) in early April to “assist” state governments and district administrations in taking care of food, shelter and other needs of migrant workers, known to have been affected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’ sudden 21-day lockdown in order to “combat” the spread of Covid-19 virus, announced on March 24?

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Dalits in India, Blacks in US suffer 'similar' humiliation: Macwan drafts letter to Trump

Counterview Desk
Well-known human rights activist Martin Macwan, recipient of the prestigious Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Award in 2000, has drafted an open letter to US President Donald Trump following the disturbing turn of events with the murder of George Floyd, leading to widespread protests in the US. He has sought signatures of concerned citizens before sending it to Trump.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”

Sitharaman's offer for rural jobs to 'create' just 3 crore rural jobs. Demand: 12 crore jobs

By Amarjeet Kaur*
The final package, the fifth one in a row, announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on May 17 was a fiasco. Sitharaman during her press conference for two hours and six minutes spent more than an hour detailing the policy actions of her government’s last six years’ rule, repeating the already provided proposals during the two budgets after coming to power for the second time, even as reiterating her briefings on the four earlier packages she had announced over the previous four days.