Skip to main content

Kejriwal government is adamant not to build Qaumi School for the poor despite Delhi High Court order

The Eidgah
By Firoz Bakht Ahmed*
It seems that even at the order and behest of the High Court of Delhi to sanction land and building for the beleaguered Qaumi School that was razed to the ground 42 years ago during the infamous Emergency in 1976 and is running in tin sheds, the Kejriwal government and its Directorate of Education is not interested and concerned at all since they do not invite me, who is the petitioner, considering me to be a persona non grata, as stated in the meeting today. When Mr Anshu Prakash, the Hon’ble Chief Secretary asked the Director Education, Ms Saumya Gupta about my locus standi as petitioner, she said that I had none!
Last time also when the meeting was conducted under the then Chief Secretary, Mr MM Kutty, no postal, telephonic or any other intimation through email etc. was sent to call me as petitioner. However, by default, I came to know about it through the Principal, Qaumi School, an invitee, and attended it. In this meeting, I called a spade a spade and stated that there was a patch of about 15-16 acre Waqf Board land just adjacent to the Eidgah (where the hapless school is presently situated) of whose around 2 acre can be used to build the school that has 711 students who are fighting the vagaries of extremities of weather for attending classes that are torn and tattered tented structures.
A tent serving as class room
This is how the Directorate of Education works. On January 10, 2018 when the meeting was going on, at 11:30, I received a call from some Mr Pawan Kumar, deputy director, Education in the Directorate of Education, asking my name. After confirming it, when I asked him if there was any meeting, he never responded to. After that many calls were made by me but he never spoke. At the same time, I received a call from the Principal of Qaumi School, Mr Mohabbat Ali that there was a call from the Directorate that a meeting was there in which he wasn’t invited but I was. As a matter of fact, the Principal of Qaumi School too should have been invited to represent it.
Even in the earlier meeting, I had complained that no intimation was sent to me but all in vain. However, the DD Pawan confided in me that the Director Education holds a low opinion about building this school and wants to close it. Besides, the two meetings with the Chief Secretary too seem to be an eye wash just to shed the burden of the High Court Order of December 05, 2017.
The PIL filed by me has contended that the state of affairs at the Qaumi School was "sad and pitiable" as it was functioning from the grounds of the Eidgah at Quresh Nagar in Old Delhi after its building was demolished. The plea has alleged that despite promises of land and building, nothing was done and the school continued to function in a "tattered, tented and tinned structure, without a building" since 1976.
Kids outside the school
The PIL, filed through advocate Atyab Siddiqui, contended that children from the "down-trodden and backward class have to suffer due to threats of closure, makeshift classrooms, leaking roofs and no proper facilities… A hostile and inclement environment can hardly be conducive for learning. With competition in board examinations reaching stupendous proportions, children from such schools are placed at a huge disadvantage from the very inception of their schooling life."
What is ironic according to me is that it is the same school that was built by those Muslims who, rather than crossing over to Pakistan in the aftermath of Partition in 1947, loyally preferred to stay here in India and built the Qaumi School in 1948. The reward that they got was that on June 30, 1976, their school was demolished to make way for “Janata Flats” and shifted in tarpaulin tents at the Delhi Eidgah grounds on the promise that the school will be built within 6 months. It is now 42 years that the residents of Quresh Nagar are waiting for a proper building for their children.
I think it is obligatory on the state to provide infrastructure including a school building and the civic authorities have failed to discharge the statutory onus.
---
*Educationist, columnist and grandnephew of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.