Skip to main content

Maruti workers to protest life sentence to 13 colleagues on Bhagat Singh's day of martyrdom, March 23

By Our Representative
In a strongly-worded statement, the Maruti Suzuki Workers Union (MSWU) has said that it “rejects the falsehood” being spread by the prosecution, which led to the life sentence to 13 of the Maruti workers on “baseless” charge of ‘murder’ on March 18.
Circulated through a Dalit media network, the statement announces that March 23, the day of martyrdom of Bhagat Singh, the Maruti Suzuki Mazdoor Sangh (MSMS), the joint platform of six Maruti Suzuki factories, have decided to give a call, Chalo Manesar, to protest against the death sentence.
A local court in Gurgaon gave the sentence on Saturday in connection with the alleged murder of a Maruti Suzuki manager, who was killed after violence and rioting at India’s largest carmaker’s plant in Manesar in 2012.
Commenting on the Gurgaon Additional Sessions Court judgment, which also sentenced four workers five years’ imprisonment and 14 workers three years’ imprisonment, though they have already spent four years in prison, hence were released, MSWU said, “Of the earlier acquitted 117 workers who spent over four years in Jail, we do not yet know as to who will return the lost years.”
In all, said the statement, 148 have already spent four years in jail without bail since 2012, and as many as 2,500 workers were “illegally terminated and then faced continual state repression.”
Referring to the details of the arguments, the statement says, “Workers had no involvement in the unfortunate death of the pro-worker manager who helped in registering the Union, Avanish Kumar Dev, this is conclusively proved in the legal case from the defence.”
“The conflict on the day of July 18, 2012”, it said, “started with a supervisor attacking a Dalit worker Jiyalal – who was later made into ‘prime accused’ in the case – with caste-based abuse, and the worker’s suspension.”
“The entire case is part of management conspiracy to finish off the union, an attack on the right to union formation itself, and the demands – particularly of abolition of contract worker System – it was raising and symbol it became for workers struggle”, it added.
According to MSWU, “The nature of the legal case was informed from the outset by the vitriolic repressive manner in which thousands of workers were continually hounded after July 18, 2012 by the nexus of the management and government, including the police, administration and labour departments.”
Taking strong exception to the prosecution’s final arguments which led to the rejection of bail for workers and favoured death penalty, the statement said, it “talked of the need of restoring ‘confidence’ of capital, and the Prime Minister’s initiative of inviting global investors for ‘Make in India’.”
“By specifically targeting the entire union body”, the statement says, the company “wants to tell us that the workers movement, the right to union formation and other trade union rights as well as human rights of workers in the country will be simply crushed by capitalists and the state.”
Pointing towards how the union was registered after a “a legitimate long struggle for trade union rights” in March 2012, the MSWU said, it was the demand for “the abolition of the contract worker system, dignity in the workplace, and an end to exploitative practices … was not acceptable to the management.”
Insisting that this led the management to “conspire and escalate the conflict July 18 2012, the statement said, the struggle expanded and workers fought in other industries as well -- Honda, Rico, Asti, Shriram Pistons, Daikin AC, and Bellsonica.
“This collective workers assertion needed to be crushed and ‘taught a lesson’ in the interests of the company managements”, the statement asserted, adding, “Similar conflicts and cases of repression on workers movements have happened from Graziano Transmissions. Noida, Regent Ceramics, Puducherry, Pricol in Chennai and so on.”

Comments

TRENDING

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Church in India 'seems to have lost' moral compass of unequivocal support to the poor

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
In 2017, Pope Francis dedicated a special day, to be observed by the Universal Church, every year, as the ‘World Day of the Poor’. This year it will be observed on November 17 on the theme ‘The hope of the poor shall not perish for ever’; in a message for the day Pope Francis says:

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”