Skip to main content

Real GDP growth 5%; Modi govt "doctored" data to arrive 7% rate, revising base figure, ignoring demonetization

By Our Representative
Prof Prabhat Patnaik, one of the topmost Indian economists, has revealed that the Government of India’s Central Statistical Organization (CSO), while announcing 7% gross domestic product (GDP) growth for the third quarter of 2016-17 (October-December 2016), did this by “revising downwards the base upon which this growth-rate is calculated”.
Calling it a clear case of “doctoring of statistics on the part of the CSO at the behest of the government”, Patnaik says, this manipulation automatically led to a surprise “jump in the growth rate from 6.2 to 7 percent”, a point noted by no other than Soumya Ghosh, who is the chief economic advisor of the State Bank of India.
Pointing towards how this was done, Patnaik says, “The GDP figure for the third quarter of 2016-17 (October-December), when the impact of the demonetization of November 8 is supposed to have been felt, is estimated to be Rs 30,27,893 crore.”
The base on which this was calculated was revised downwards not once but thrice, Prof Patnaik says, and the whole idea was to arrive at 7% rate of growth. First the base – which is third quarter GDP for 2015-16 – as announced on February 9, 2016, was Rs 28,52,339 crore. Then on May 31, 2016, this figure was slightly revised downwards to Rs 28,51,682 crores.”
As both these figures would have meant a 6.2% growth-rate for 2016-17, Prof Patnaik says, finally, on February 28, 2017, “suddenly”, the base was further reduced to Rs 28,30,760 crore, getting the third quarter growth rate of 7 percent for 2016-17!
This, says Prof Patnaik, was not the only manipulation. Pointing that the CSO’s GDP is not based “value added figures taken from the producing units”, he says, they have been taken from company balance sheet data, leading to a “lower coverage for informal sector producers who are not listed as companies, and who are the ones that have faced the brunt of the impact of demonetization.”
Then, he says, following demonetization the trade channels “paid promptly to the producers through currency notes that had been demonetized.” This led to the producers making “larger tax payments than usual to the government in the form of demonetized currency.” And as the net indirect tax collections “were far larger than usual”, the CSO decided to calculate these as gross value added, “boosting GDP figures significantly”!
Concludes Prof Patnaik, “The 7% growth rate for the third quarter of 2016-17 claimed by the government which would come down to 6.2 percent if the base figure is not adjusted, would come down further if the under-representation of the informal sector in GDP estimates is taken note of, and would come down still further if the effect of arbitrarily large net indirect tax collections is additionally taken note of.” In fact, it would have been 2% lower -- around 5%.
Calling this “inversion of reason” unprecedented in independent India, Prof Patnaik says, “One just has to step out of one’s home to the grocery shop round the corner to acquaint oneself of the drop in business which the grocer has suffered owing to demonetization.”
Instead of recognizing this, one sees is a Prime Minister “targeting a person of Prof Amartya Sen’s eminence through some fatuous and meaningless remarks about Harvard and ‘Hard Work’.”
“It is like the naked emperor strutting around in his nakedness and ridiculing all those who had called him naked with the words: ‘See how wrong and stupid you were. My courtiers have shown I am fully clothed’!”

Comments

Unknown said…
All that one need to see is the explanation given by TCA Ananth who is far more professional than Prof Patnaik. As the Head of the State Planning Board in Kerala he hardly distinguished himself!
Anonymous said…
PM is destroying everything to make things look good.He is against a good India , manupultses everything in his ignorance and arrogance.Intellect and literacy has no meaning in his tenure but the officials go to any extent to make him happy.Why, is he a monarch ?Even monarchs go by the data ,The Democratic institutions have stooped to this PM and his vagaries destroying each brick of India on which if is built.
Tapas Jana said…
In last line of your statement you have disclose the reality, sir. It's really surprising how our national leaders can make people fool giving fake data in front of the world to conceal their unplanned decision.
Anonymous said…
But GDP method is changed since 2015. Nothing new.
M K Mathai said…
Manipulation was suspected on day one . but such obvious trick like lowering the base was not expected . simplicity indeed is the trademark of modi
Ramesh Matham said…
"Targeting a person of Amartya Sen's eminence", eh? Lemme ask you, Dr Patnaik, it is ok for Amartya Sen to call demonetisation "despotic", which is a harsh and personal comment, but it is terrible if Modi merely observes that hard work has got the better of Harvard?

Amartya Sen is free to say what he wants, but then so is Modi or anybody.
If Sen is open to attacking, he should be open to being counter-attacked.

As for GDP numbers, ok, let's agree that the government lied. Let us throw this government out and replace it with....whom? The ramrod straight, absolutely honest Congress? Or CPI(M), which has the credit of transforming the poor economy of West Bengal into a clone of the United States? Or, Bahujan Samaj Party, or AIADMK, or what?

An intellectual should not let dogma interfere with objective analysis.
Deshbandhu said…
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/cracking-the-gdp-mystery/article17420118.ece
vinod said…
Those civil servants who do not manipulate figures are not taken to HAG. They are pushed out. This is bureaucracy rule, CAG and other institutions are post analysis institutions and do not correct anything.

PM has most important task of keeping masses out of depression while doing corrective maintenance of society.

He will not even know that figures presented are manipulated.

Often Ministers to keep their performance figures high sacrifice honest approach.
Another intellectual waste. No real value. Wasted my time reading this prof.
Good for nothing.. Typically research type boring story. Waste of time...
Anonymous said…
The ram rod UPA managed better GDP for a better part of their rule at a time when crude prices were at it's highest. The lowest they got were in the last two or three years. At least they had highly rated economists planning it all and not some guy who passed a law degree. And the fact that the government fudged numbers to make them selves look good is a down right low. How people still fancy them is beyond belief.
Ram Mohandas said…
Statistics is a very interesting subject if you put one leg in ice water and other in a very hot object, you are having a balanced temperature according to statistics .but in reality it is otherwise as all will know.so don't go by that jargon.this is the simple case of politics being the root cause.if you are in opposition to BJP you can create a suitable statistical formula to suit your needs,if you are on the other side one can make another to suit your needs to satisfy the public who are not knowledgeable enough to understand the ploy one make
Aparna said…
I fully agree with you! Amartya Sent may have won a Nobel prize, but he did nothing for the Indian Economy!
Anonymous said…
FAKE NEWS.
KnowTheTruth said…
well, at least he did not harm the economy.
KnowTheTruth said…
do you find it more interesting to stand in queues all day to deposit old currency, and another day in withdrawing Rs.2500 ?
These useless intellectuals are not doing any good to either India or its people. They are spoiling everything just because of personal hate they carry against Modi and BJP. This prof. has spent decades and decades of his life teaching economics, ask him what has been his contribution to India or can he list three things he has done which helped poor or needy to live a more respectable life. These are idiots and should be ignored.
Unknown said…
Largely comments based on prejudices not different from Patnaik's. Who is a CPM man
Clear Thought said…
1. A choice between two evils does not make the chosen evil good.
2. Most Indians voted for Modi just because they hoped he was the better evil.
3. As they say, one feels ones health, irrespective of anything else; we have only to look around and talk to a shop owner, a manufacturing unit owner or even a vegetable vendor. Ask them if their business has improved or gone down in the last two years and you will not have to look at the continuously declining PMI for last 7 quarters...
Assess dispassionately and you will feel the status of our economic and social health.
bhartendu said…
Yes, base GDP figures were revised, but if such revision was necessarily manipulation ? The writer has not thrown any light on that. Why Amartya Sen can not be attacked ? Because of his 'eminence' ? That is another ridiculous argument.
Unknown said…
If current PM Mr. Modi is against good India then who else among the PM in Congress has ever give a good India.Remember world history will surely recognise him as a legendary person for his long vision toward making India a developed nation. Free subsidy consuming narrow minded secularists which are facultative sanguverous parasites can't understand or behave as if they don't understand things
bigboss said…
Its not about replacing the Govt. Thats not the question here..if the govt is not to be replaced as yet, do we lose the right to question. However, the fact that u too admit that this Govt has lied is appreciable. This , indeed is the hallmark of this Govt of fake degree holders, Top to bottom. I do not expect them to fare better..
Anonymous said…
Mr Whoever!!, I wonder where were you all these years??? Never heard about you on any, Why only now? Where were you all these years?
bigboss said…
Why wont he know. What the troll army of bjp doing? Every other remark of this pm in up election originates from whatsapp intelligetsia(so called). Its pretty evident that he is a keen follower of social media. Media is today aflood with the data and articles about this manipulation. Will modiji take action against his fin min.
bigboss said…
Agree in toto
Firstly NDA left the growth rate at above 10 level. So UPA had same momentum. Secondly Manmohan had very good governance support from NDA ruled states Gujarat Bihar madyapradesh, chatishgarh, jarkand Goa etc. these states growth rate were nearly gdp of 5 & above than other states.
surya said…
Absolutely true. Well said
Amit Tripathi said…
GDP is Gross domestic produce not gross domestic consumption.Talk on the grounds not in the air....
People used demonetized money to but medicines, food etc. So production had to increase
M Ramesh said…
I ask Prof Patnaik why it is ok for Amartya Sen to call Modi a "despot", but is wrong for Modi to even say "hard work is better than Harvard". Amartya Sen's harsh and personal words are "intellectual criticism" but Modi's mild riposte is "targeting an eminent person as Amartya Sen". What nonsense!
Does anybody have any counter to this?
Unknown said…
GDP base is always revised This is not first case. Highly incomplete and incompetent article
Romil Singal said…
This is not Modi calculation

http://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/india-to-grow-at-77-in-2018-19-imf/article18413483.ece/amp/
Romil Singal said…
Base year changes in every 5 yrs. It was changed in 2010 by Congress govt to 2005 and now again after 5 yrs to 2010 by Modi govt. to match global trend.
This is just one of the lies that Modi himself is propagaring and there are lot more. as per modi and his bhakths harvard has no value, foreign intellectuals has no value, english has no value , animals other than cow has no value. but most of these intelletuals will be living out side india, trying hard to get USA greencard, citizen ship for their kids, propagating fake at work and social life. better instead of institutions we will build ram mandirs , meditate and dream of glorious india which is 10,000 yrs back.

If a person of PM stature is trying to propagate lies then imagine what his bhakt jan at grass root level can do. they believe in glorying india by faking, yes harvard cannot help here only hardwork to manipulate will.
Senthilvasan said…
It is so sad that despite all those pillars of Democracy, we still allow these "jumla Bazi" folks to carry on unabated with their ineffective, incompetent and immoral ways.

One thing is very clear, the Bureaucracy and the press are silenced using multiple ways. the only way we save ourselves is to use Social Media effectively and spread the message across to the masses through one-to-one contact, wherever possible.
I do both and we could see the results in the recent Rk Nagar elections, where people have given five times more vote to NOTA when compared to the BJP.

Thanks to articles like these, they help us to write with more conviction.

Anonymous said…
Senthilvasan : R K nagar elections are indeed an interesting example of the ways of Tamil politics. Of course it was all about ideology and policies not money!!
C Parthapratim said…
Lol! Hitler is legendary too.
Anonymous said…
what is DATA, all we see is poor people with no jobs.

TRENDING

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

Poser to Modi: Why is Gujarat not fulfilling Constitutional obligations to minorities?

Counterview Desk
In an open letter, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee (MCC), a Gujarat-based civil rights organization, has accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi on infringing upon MCC activists’ constitutional right to protest. Nafees says, they had no other demands except that the Gujarat government should move towards fulfilling the constitutional obligations towards minorities and international treaties to which India is a signatory.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.