Skip to main content

Gujarat model? Allocation for Dalits 2.67% in 2017-18 budget against 7% population, lurking gap of Rs 7,001 crore

By A Representative
A budget analysis by the Gujarat-based Dalit Arthik Adhikar Andolan has alleged that the Gujarat government has made the lowest percentage of allocation for the Scheduled Caste Sub-Plan (SCSP) in the state budget for 2017-18, presented in the state assembly last month, ever since 2010-11.
Carried out by Dalit scholar Vasudev Charupa, the analysis says, “Against the need-based requirement, and keeping in view of the resources in sight, the size of Annual Budget 2017-18 has been fixed at Rs 1,72,179.24 Crore. But of concern is the missing focus for the scheduled castes’ socio-economic development.”
Thus, he says, as against the Dalit population of 7%, the state government has allocated just about 2.67% for SCSP – or Rs 4,603.69 crore. The proportional allocation, he adds, should have been due Rs 11,604.88 crore. This means that a massive Rs 7,001.19 less amount was allocated for Gujarat Dalits’ development.
While the allocation for the outgoing financial year (2016-17) was 5.13%, double that of what has been allocated for 2017-18, the next lowest since 2010-11 was in 2014-15, 4.15%. The highest allocation was in 2012-13 – 5.63%.
“Instead of genuinely planning for the SCs in a manner that ensures that critical gaps to access development are filled so that they could reach level-playing field with the rest of the population in education, housing, health, employment, access to civic amenities, entrepreneurship, etc., the SCSP has been reduced to a mere accounting exercise”, Charupa says.
Contesting the central theme of the budget for fiscal 2017-18, which claims to be to “optimize inclusive development of human resources and trunk infrastructure through effective and transparent implementation”, the scholar says, “There remain serious gaps in the implementation of this strategy.”
Calling the 2.67% allocation “a huge denial of Dalits’ socio-economic constitutional rights”, Charupa calculates, over the last eight years, the total amount denied to the Dalits has reached Rs 13,95.97 crore.
Calling it the ruling BJP’s “caste mentality”, Charupa says, the SCSP, just as the Tribal Sub Plan (TSP), was “conceptualized to address the multiple developmental deficits faced by the SCs”.
“The idea was to channelize funds and benefits from the general sectors in the Central/state ministries towards the development of SCs and STs, at least in proportion to their share in the total population”, he adds.
Providing department-wise allocation for under SCSP, Charupa says, for water supply sanitation head Rs 130.23 crore has been allocated, which comes to 3.34%. This is particularly “objectionable” in view of the fact that Gujarat’s “metro cities and towns are facing crucial issue in slums lack of water and sanitation facilities.”
Then, under the nutrition head, only Rs 89.90 crore has been allocated – which comes to 2.58% of the allocation under it. According to Charupa, the low allocation comes despite the fact that Gujarat ranks high in malnourishment.
He adds, “The major heads related to the livelihood, such as labour and employment, soil and water conservation, animal husbandry, fisheries, food storage and warehousing, cooperation, industries and other general economic sectors have been allocated anywhere between 0.04% to 3%.”

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.