Skip to main content

Gujarat model? Allocation for Dalits 2.67% in 2017-18 budget against 7% population, lurking gap of Rs 7,001 crore

By A Representative
A budget analysis by the Gujarat-based Dalit Arthik Adhikar Andolan has alleged that the Gujarat government has made the lowest percentage of allocation for the Scheduled Caste Sub-Plan (SCSP) in the state budget for 2017-18, presented in the state assembly last month, ever since 2010-11.
Carried out by Dalit scholar Vasudev Charupa, the analysis says, “Against the need-based requirement, and keeping in view of the resources in sight, the size of Annual Budget 2017-18 has been fixed at Rs 1,72,179.24 Crore. But of concern is the missing focus for the scheduled castes’ socio-economic development.”
Thus, he says, as against the Dalit population of 7%, the state government has allocated just about 2.67% for SCSP – or Rs 4,603.69 crore. The proportional allocation, he adds, should have been due Rs 11,604.88 crore. This means that a massive Rs 7,001.19 less amount was allocated for Gujarat Dalits’ development.
While the allocation for the outgoing financial year (2016-17) was 5.13%, double that of what has been allocated for 2017-18, the next lowest since 2010-11 was in 2014-15, 4.15%. The highest allocation was in 2012-13 – 5.63%.
“Instead of genuinely planning for the SCs in a manner that ensures that critical gaps to access development are filled so that they could reach level-playing field with the rest of the population in education, housing, health, employment, access to civic amenities, entrepreneurship, etc., the SCSP has been reduced to a mere accounting exercise”, Charupa says.
Contesting the central theme of the budget for fiscal 2017-18, which claims to be to “optimize inclusive development of human resources and trunk infrastructure through effective and transparent implementation”, the scholar says, “There remain serious gaps in the implementation of this strategy.”
Calling the 2.67% allocation “a huge denial of Dalits’ socio-economic constitutional rights”, Charupa calculates, over the last eight years, the total amount denied to the Dalits has reached Rs 13,95.97 crore.
Calling it the ruling BJP’s “caste mentality”, Charupa says, the SCSP, just as the Tribal Sub Plan (TSP), was “conceptualized to address the multiple developmental deficits faced by the SCs”.
“The idea was to channelize funds and benefits from the general sectors in the Central/state ministries towards the development of SCs and STs, at least in proportion to their share in the total population”, he adds.
Providing department-wise allocation for under SCSP, Charupa says, for water supply sanitation head Rs 130.23 crore has been allocated, which comes to 3.34%. This is particularly “objectionable” in view of the fact that Gujarat’s “metro cities and towns are facing crucial issue in slums lack of water and sanitation facilities.”
Then, under the nutrition head, only Rs 89.90 crore has been allocated – which comes to 2.58% of the allocation under it. According to Charupa, the low allocation comes despite the fact that Gujarat ranks high in malnourishment.
He adds, “The major heads related to the livelihood, such as labour and employment, soil and water conservation, animal husbandry, fisheries, food storage and warehousing, cooperation, industries and other general economic sectors have been allocated anywhere between 0.04% to 3%.”

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”