Skip to main content

Bhopal was struck by two tragedies: Immediate and long term

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
When George Orwell wrote his celebrated novel ‘1984’, he perhaps never realised that India would actually be witnessing a series of events in 1984 which include the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, the genocide on the Sikhs which followed and the Bhopal Gas Tragedy. ‘The party leader’, in his novel, is euphemistically named ‘Big Brother’ who is only interested in power and like the party he represents, not in the good of others. ‘1984’ was written by Orwell in 1949 – 35 years ago. Today, as one looks back at the year 1984, one can say that Orwell could have conveniently situated his novel in Bhopal. Strangely, the adjective ‘Orwellian’ has become synonymous with official deception, secret surveillance and manipulation of recorded history by a totalitarian or authoritarian State.
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy will be etched forever in living memory; despite every effort, by those across the ruling divide, to sweep things under the carpet, to stifle dissent and even to buy up victim-survivors. On the eve of the 31st anniversary of the tragedy, the Bhopal Group of Information and Action (BGIA) categorically stated that “the Modi Government as well as the previous Governments have been totally deaf to the demands of the victim-survivors.”
In a book released last year, entitled ‘Bhopal Gas Tragedy: after 30 years’, authors Sunita Narain and Chandra Bhushan write, ’it was on the night of December 2, 1984, when Bhopal died a million deaths. The chemical, methyl isocyanate (MIC), that spilled out from Union Carbide India Ltd’s (UCIL) pesticide factory turned the city into a vast gas chamber. People ran on the streets, vomiting and dying. The city ran out of cremation grounds. It was India’s first (and so far, the only) major industrial disaster. Till then, governments had handled floods, cyclones and even earthquakes. They had no clue how to respond in this case. The US-based multinational company, Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), which owned the plant through its subsidiary UCIL, did little to help deal with the human tragedy. Thirty years later, there is no closure. Not because of what happened that fateful night, but because our response has been incompetent and callous. Bhopal was struck by two tragedies: the one that happened immediately, and the other that unfolded in the years that followed”.
According to official estimates by the Government about 5,295 people were killed in the early hours of December 3rd1984. Those fighting for the victim-survivors maintain that more than 25,000 more have died from various illnesses related to the leakage. In 2012, the UPA Government engaged in some tokenism providing additional compensation to about 33,000 ‘severely-affected’ survivors but the BGIA and others maintain that the Government underestimated both the number of victims, the amount of compensation and who should actually get it.
In the meantime, Dow Chemical Company who now owns Union Carbide has washed its hands off the whole affair and the incumbent Government of India is doing pretty little to ensure that the cause of justice is served; its ‘Make in India’ campaign seems to be an open invitation for foreign companies to maximise their profits at the cost of Indians, our natural resources and the environment. Organisations like ‘Greenpeace’ who identify with and take up cudgels on behalf of the poor and the marginalised are hounded and prevented from continuing their good works.
Even though the ‘Orwellian’ seems to have an upper hand, the Bhopal Gas Tragedy should be a grim reminder, however painful, that much more needs to be done not merely for the victims of this colossal tragedy but for every single citizen – who may fall prey to the greed and profiteering of callous corporations who are often in nexus with the Government. It does not matter if the victims are illiterate, poor and ordinary people – they are still humans endowed with dignity and deserving of justice!
—
*Director, Prashant, Ahmedabad-based Jesuit Centre for Human Rights, Justice and Peace

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.

European banks accused of coal double standard after shunning Adani’s Galilee mine in Australia

By Rajiv Shah    European banks that helped shut down Adani ’s Galilee Basin coal frontier in Australia a decade ago are now bankrolling a far larger coal expansion just 150 kilometres away, according to a new report from Reclaim Finance and partner NGOs. The study , "Coal Hypocrisy: European Banks’ Double Standard on Thermal and Metallurgical Coal in Australia", finds that 19 European banks provided US$30.3 billion to companies planning metallurgical coal expansion in Queensland’s Bowen Basin between 2021 and 2025, out of a total of US$105.9 billion from international banks.