Skip to main content

Warning "terrorist activities", Gujarat government imposes curfew on tribal district ahead of protest movement

Romel Sutariya leading a rally in Chhotaudepur
By A Representative
In a curious move, the Gujarat government has imposed curfew under Section 144, prohibiting assembly of more than ten people in the predominantly tribal district of Chhotaudepur, till February 14. The order, dated January 31, 2015, says that it has been “imposed in order to prevent terrorist activities in Chhotaudepur town and all the talukas of the district”. The order adds that it has been necessitated to “ensure law and order, peace and security”, and “no procession or gathering” could be held during the period.
Reacting sharply, the tribal organization, Adivasi Kisan Sangharsh Morcha (AKSM) chief Romel Sutariya, who was scheduled to begin an indefinite fast in front of the district collector’s office in Chhotaudepur against the “failure” of the administration to stop the sand mining entrepreneurs from "grabbing" tribal land, said, “By this order, the Gujarat government appears to think that the tribals, who have been peacefully protesting for their rights, are terrorists.” He added, “This is nothing but a conspiracy against the tribals’ efforts to claim their right over land, jungle and water.”
In a statement, AKSM wonders, “Is this the face of the Gujarat model? It seems that the government is terribly afraid of our continuing protest movement in the district. Already, one of our senior leaders, Jayram Gamit, a tribal, was arrested on Saturday late evening under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act (PASA Act), and taken to Rajkot. And, now prohibitory orders to prevent the district from terrorist activities have been imposed. Are these the good days (acche din), which the Modi administration had promised?”
State order on curfew referring to "terrorist threat"
The statement said, “We had decided, starting on February 2, to demonstrate for the tribals’ sovereign rights over the natural resources and privatization of their land. One of the programmes was to stage a sit-in demonstration in front of the district administration office in Chhotaudepur. This was going to be in culmination of the protests we had launched demanding better infrastructure in the district, including road, school, power, hospital, women’s security, and complete stoppage of illegal sand mining.”
The statement added, “One of our demands of our demonstration has been to withdraw the recent land acquisition ordinance, which was promulgated by the Modi government without any discussion in the Lok Sabha. It has opened up land resources for private interests in large parts of India. The ordinary replaces the land acquisition Act, which made social impact assessment and consent of the local people a must for any move to acquire land by the government for private and public-private projects.”
The statement does not say whether the planned protest move in front of the Chhotaudepur district administration would continue despite prohibitive orders. It merely terms the order as “draconian” and “dictatorial”, but gives no indication on how the ADSM is going to fight against it. “There is no statement from the Opposition Congress over the move declare the district as terrorist prone, nor have any voluntary organizations come forward to declare it as such”, a keen Gujarat observer said.

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”