Skip to main content

OECD chief economist supports RBI governor's Make for India view, insists, integrate it into Make in India

By Our Representative
Catherine Mann, chief economist of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), has come out in sharp defense of the view taken by Reserve Bank of India governor Dr Raghuram Rajan, who stirred controversy late last year-end by declaring Make for India was a better policy option to follow as against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Make in India campaign. Talking with newspersons in Ahmedabad, Mann said, it would be better if India’s focus on “Make in India”  includes the “Make for India” concept of Dr Rajan.
Without naming Dr Rajan, Mann declared, "Make in India should be Make for India", pointing out, she is "quite aware" of strong views in the country in favours of Make for India. Mann was at the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) to deliver a lecture on Macroeconomic Challenges of India in context of the recently released report, ‘Third OECD Economic Survey of India’.
Suggesting that Make in India appears to suggest that India is seeking to follow the Chinese model, Mann said, China has developed islands of progress in its special economic zones where there are no-tax regimes with export as the key direction. This can result in short-term gain, but does not take into account the interests of the entire country's economy. She added, the Make in India concept does not clarify make for whom, whether for export to other countries.
In Dr Rajan’s view on Make for India, Modi 'Make in India' campaign assumes an export-led growth path of China. Speaking at an event organized by the Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), he had insisted, it should instead it should be 'Make for India' that would produce for the internal market. He had underlined, an incentive-driven, export-led growth or import-substitution strategy may not work for India in the current global scenario.
Talking to newspersons after her lecture, Mann took a similar view, saying, China’s export model has would have limited success. It does not go far enough. There is a huge market within the country which needs to be tapped. Investments from all sources should beencouraged, allowing internal businesses to flourish. While there have been some policy declarations such change in the labour law, the main challenge is how these policy changes are implemented.
Pointing towards the need to come up with several reforms, Mann said, without naming any particular state, already, some Indian states are implementing progressive laws that will foster employment. The Prime Minister has provided a business-friendly umbrella for other states to act. While some of the states have gone ahead, others have not. The political process of implementing the reforms is challenging.
Answering a question on labour reforms, Mann asserted, they are extremely important because the current labour law may have some good points, but is does not help generate employment. There is a need to loosen the law in order to cover the informal labour market, contract workers, and other ill-paid workers. There are of course complexities in bringing about changes laws related with in tax, labour, wages and business. The present uncertainty must end.
To yet another question as to what she thought of the Government of India’s recent decision to redo the way it calculates GDP, which put India’s growth in 2013-14 at 7.4 per cent instead of 5 per cent under, the OECD chief economist said, the new method of calculation is more in tune with international norms. If under the earlier calculation large sectors of the economy were not part taken into account, under the new methodology several small firms’ performance has been mobilized into national accounts.

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

A locked up offer? Govt of India 'not serious' in involving NGOs: IIM-A survey

By Rajiv Shah
Was the Government of India serious when it asked 92,000 civil society organizations (CSOs) in early April to “assist” state governments and district administrations in taking care of food, shelter and other needs of migrant workers, known to have been affected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’ sudden 21-day lockdown in order to “combat” the spread of Covid-19 virus, announced on March 24?

Gujarat link of controversial US doctor who 'forced' WHO quiz Trump's wonder drug

By Rajiv Shah
A top American doctor, Sapan Sharankishor Desai, born and raised in the “affluent” North Shore (Chicago) region of Illinois by Indian parents, at one point of time involved in NGO activity through the Desai Foundation dedicated to “improving” the lives of the impoverished in Gujarat, is in the eyes of a major international storm following his paper in a “Lancet” questioning Donald Trump-promoted drug hydroxychloroquine.

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Dalits in India, Blacks in US suffer 'similar' humiliation: Macwan drafts letter to Trump

Counterview Desk
Well-known human rights activist Martin Macwan, recipient of the prestigious Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Award in 2000, has drafted an open letter to US President Donald Trump following the disturbing turn of events with the murder of George Floyd, leading to widespread protests in the US. He has sought signatures of concerned citizens before sending it to Trump.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”