Skip to main content

Kejriwal's four days in Gujarat to get a whiff of Big B's multi-crore commercial Khushboo Gujarat Ki

By Nachiketa Desai*
Big B of Bollywood beckons one and all to spend at least two days in Gujarat to feel the fragrance of Modiland. A 56-inch chest-thumping Narendra Modi woos the voters of Banaras saying, "Give me 60 months as Prime Minister, I will end all the woes of the weavers by setting up artificial silk making powerlooms just as in Surat,"
Arvind Kejriwal decides to spend not just two but four days in Gujarat to get a whiff of the fragrance AB is talking about in his multi-crore-rupee TV commercial, 'Khushboo Gujarat Ki'. He comes to Gujarat as a common man. There is no frill of flags, banners and loudspeaker. He travels in a car to North Gujarat, Saurashtra and Kutch, meeting village folks, men and women. He listens to them patiently, taking notes painstakingly.
A posse of policemen, in uniform and without, trailed him, walkie-talkie in hand, reporting his minute-to-minute movement to the 'Saheb' in Gandhinagar. Kejriwal stops at a village, some 100 km from Ahmedabad, to meet about 50-60 men and women who tell him about widespread corruption they encounter in their daily life, about schools that have closed down in the absence of teachers, primary health centres that have ceased to exist as there are no doctors or nurses to attend to the patients, their farm land taken away and handed over to big industries, the norm of taking bribe money by police and revenue officials.
At a couple of crossroads, a dozen-odd men wave blag flags at him and shout, "Kejriwal, go back". Kejriwal moves on but is stopped by the police and taken to a police station at Radhanpur. "You have violated the model code of conduct of the Election Commission by your roadshow without taking prior permission," the officer in-charge of the police station tells him. "There is no roadshow. I am not carrying flag, poster, pamphlet, nor am I making any speech," he counters. "But, you are obstructing traffic," the police changes track. He is let off after 15-20 minutes of argument.
As Kejriwal enters Kutch, a mob of 30-40 men block his way, smashes the windscreen of his car and scoots. Police watch from a distance.
Kejriwal had not come alone on a visit to Gujarat for a reality check. Over 200 fellow volunteers of the Aam Aadmi Party too had come. They had spread out all across the state - North, South, East, West - in an effort to find out the truth of Gujarat. Most of them were not known faces. They went unnoticed by Modi supporters and police. Manish Sisodia and Gopal Rai were not lucky. The vehicles they were travelling in were attacked and their local hosts harassed by the police.
His fact-finding mission over, Kejriwal and his army of investigators returned to Ahmedabad. After holding a press conference where he disclosed his findings, Kejriwal wanted to meet Narendra Modi for a 'chai par charcha' on 16 questions he had for the man with a 56-inch chest. Five kilometres before he reached Gandhinagar, the state capital, to meet Modi, Kejriwal was stopped by the police. Over a hundred BJP workers too had positioned themselves to prevent Kejriwal from going further.
"Why is Modi afraid of meeting me? I am not a terrorist. I am a common man. All those present here who have had the chance to meet Modi ever in their life, please raise your hand," Kejriwal asked at the public meeting in Ahmedabad attended by over 50,000 people. Only a couple of hands were raised. "I am open to meeting Modi any time any place," he said.
"Modi, Modi, Modi, Modi", a group of over two dozen men raised a cry in unison from the left side of the stage from where Kejriwal was addressing the meeting. "Please come up on the stage, any one of you to answer my questions," he challenged the sloganeers. All of a sudden, stones started flying, aimed at the stage. Lathi-wielding policemen, chased the protesters who disappeared into a narrow bylane.
Continuing his speech, Kejriwal said, "Modi is a liar. He paints a rosy picture of Gujarat before the country. All lies." He then gave out details from his notepad nailing Modi's lies about development on various fronts. "He has benefited only the Ambanis, Adanis and Tatas, Ruias, working as their property broker. Taken away land from the farmers and gifted his cronies to expand their empire. He has destroyed small and medium scale industries. To facilitate easy access to the corridors of power, he has made Sourabh Patel, the son-in-law of Ramnik Ambani, a cabinet minister with petroleum and energy portfolio."
"There is rampant corruption even at the lowest rung of the bureaucracy. Modi has encouraged the practice of employing contract workers as teachers, constables, nurses, forest guards, so that they are exploited and poorly paid. Unemployment has increased manifold. Hundreds of farmers have committed suicide. Agriculture production has declined."
"If Modi succeeds in becoming the Prime Minister, the gas price will double from the present four dollars per unit to eight dollars whereas its production price is just one dollar. This will lead to increased price of fertilizer, electricity and transportation. All this to fatten the purse of Ambanis and Adanis," he said.
He ended his speech reiterating his demand to meet Narendra Modi to seek replies to his questions on "Khushboo Gujarat Ki."
---
*Senior journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.

Not just Indian women engineers, men too face sexual harassment at workplace: US study

By Rajiv Shah
A recent research, carried out jointly by two US-based non-profit organizations, Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and Center for WorkLife Law (WLL), based at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has found that 45% of women engineers as against 28% of men engineers complained that it was perceived as “inappropriate when women argued at work, even when it was work-related.”