Environmental body wonders why is Gujarat govt refusing to send 1,700 projects to Centre for eco-clearance

In a fresh move, Gujarat’s top environmental body Paryavaran Mitra has wondered why is the Gujarat government reluctant to send more than 1,700 projects to the Government of India for environmental clearance pending delay in the formation of the State-level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) of the Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). Saying that the delay has stalled implementation of these projects, most of which are of small scale nature, Paryavaran Mitra said, the law is very clear that in case SEAC is not formed, projects should be sent to the Centre.

Quoting from the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) notification 2006, para 4 (iii), Paryavaran Mitra has said, “In the absence of a duly constituted SEIAA or SEAC, a category ‘B’ project shall be treated as a Category ‘A’ project.” Category ‘B’ projects are those do not require any environmental clearance from the Centre and could be cleared at the state-level committees. They are mostly projects which are assessed as not creating a high level of environmental impact. Only category ‘A’ projects are sent to the Government of India for clearance.
In all, 1,739 projects are pending clearance because of an eight-month delay in the formation of the SEAC. The Gujarat government delayed sending application to Government of India for SEAC’s formation by six months. Mahesh Pandya, director, Paryavaran Mitra, in letter to senior officials of the Gujarat government, including state environment secretary HK Dash and member-secretary, Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB), Hardik Shah, a copy of which was sent to the Government of India’s ministry of forests and environment (MoEF), has further quoted from the EIA notification as substantiate his point on why it is mandatory for all projects to get environmental clearance.
The notification says: “All projects or activities included as Category ‘B’ in the Schedule, including expansion and modernization of existing projects or activities, or change in product mix, but excluding those which fulfill the General Conditions (GC) stipulated in the Schedule, will require prior environmental clearance from the State/Union territory Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). The SEIAA shall base its decision on the recommendations of a State or Union territory level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) as to be constituted for in this notification.”
Pandya insists, “In view of the above, the state government should have informed MoEF about delay in application and requested MOEF to started appraisal of Category B projects by treating it as category A project from the time the tenure of last SEAC was over in accordance to EIA notification. In the state where development is of prime importance, the state government has taken this issue very lightly. Here small entrepreneurs are the victim who cannot start their project because of negligence of the state government.”
Giving details of the delay in the formation of SEAC, Pandya said, “SEAC, which is advisory committee of the SEIAA, is in the process of being formed. Normally, it entertains environmental clearance applications related to category ‘B’ projects. The last SEAC committee of Gujarat was formed on July 23, 2010, whose tenure ended on July 22, 2013, which means Gujarat does not have its SEAC committee for 8 months. Almost 1,739 projects, most of them small enterprises, have remained without being cleared till December 3, 2013. Failure to form SEAC happened because there was delay in sending application by the Gujarat government to form SEAC. Instead of sending application early last year, it was sent in November 2013, four months after the former SEAC committee’s term ended.”
Facts about so many projects are pending clearance came to light following a Right to Information (RTI) application, filed by senior activist Kirit Rathod. It revealed that the Gujarat government has refused to form SEAC, which is supposed to provide environmental clearance to category ‘B’ projects not requiring Government of India nod, and as many as 1,739 projects remained without being cleared since July 2013, when the former SEAC’s three-year term expired.
The first SEAC of Gujarat was formed, under Central environmental law in June 2007, whose term ended in June 2010. In July 2010, the second SEAC was formed. Ever since it was formed, according to environmental experts, Gujarat government considered it as a “convenient body”, which could ensure clearances at the prompting of the government. “The situation reached such a point that the Gujarat government asked SEAC to provide environmental clearance to the Mahatma Mandir in Gandhinagar after it began being implemented”, Pandya told Counterview.

Comments

Policy Bazaar seems to think, not Right to Education but insurance ensures a kid's school admission

While frequent advertisements on TV are extremely jarring, I was a little amused while watching a Policy Bazaar-sponsored advertisement. The advisement by one of India's most well-known online insurance brokers sees a woman asking a kid entering the house why he hasn't been to school. The kid enters in with a bag full of vegetables in his hand which he presumably bought in the market at a time he should have been in the school.

Has Gujarat missed the Artificial Intelligence bus like it missed the IT bus in 1990s?

Has Gujarat missed the Artificial Intelligence (AI) bus as it did the Information Technology (IT) bus in the 1990s despite claiming to be an industrial powerhouse sought to be promoted by none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi? It would seem so if the latest study by the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) "Labour-force Perception about AI: A Study on Indian White-collar Workers" is any indication.

Addressing caste discrimination in US higher education: Rutgers report sparks controversy

In a surprise move, an American university has published a "controversial" report titled "Caste-Based Discrimination in US Higher Education and at Rutgers". The report has sparked debate, as no sooner was it released than an Indian diaspora advocacy group, CasteFiles, filed a complaint against Rutgers University and Prof. Audrey Truschke, co-chair of the task force that prepared the report. The complaint, filed under Title VI of the US Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleges violations of the right to education free from harassment and discrimination.

Majority white collar workers fear job loss as AI grows at CAGR of 25-35% in India

An Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) study, "Labour-force Perception about AI: A Study on Indian White-collar Workers", has revealed that as many as 60% of white collar workers fear job loss as a result of artificial intelligence (IA) being introduced in Indian industry, while only 53% "hope" that new jobs will be created.

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication. Quoting the September 27 MoEFCC's Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) meeting, released on October 2, a senior scholar-activist of the top environmental advocacy group South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP) has reported that in a "respite" to forest dwelling communities, fragile biodiversity and community conservation areas, the EAC has "rejected" the Adani application for project. However, the window for continuing with the controversial project hasn't been entirely closed. To quote Parineeta Dandekar, the ...

NHRC failing to 'effectively address' human rights violations: NGO groups tell UN-linked body

In a joint submission to the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions' (GANHRI's) Sub Committee on Accreditation (SCA), two civil society groups -- All India Network of NGOs and Individuals working with National and State Human Rights Institutions (AiNNI) and Asian NGO Network on National Human Rights Institutions (ANNI) -- have said that the National Human Rights Commission's (NHRC's) accreditation, deferred in 2016, 2023, and 2024, fails to find space on its website. In their submission to the top global body which coordinates the relationship between NHRIs and the United Nations human rights system, AiNNI and ANNI said, the accreditation status of NHRC "has not been updated" since 2017, and as of September 21, 2024, the "website falsely states that the NHRC has retained its 'A' accreditation status from SCA for four consecutive five-year terms." They added, such omission diminishes "civil society's trust" in N...

Two persons with old typewriters off SLC's fashionable street, writing poems on postcards!

A few days back, after taking a round of beautiful hills surrounding Salt Lake City (SLC), we drove down to a popular, somewhat fashionable spot -- Harvey Milk Blvd -- not very far from the Down Town. We visited a few shops, where mainly souvenirs were being sold, and also a few sex toys! Finally, we visited an ice cream parlour, where we tasted Italian ice cream. It is a well decorated parlour, with different coloured lovely goodies hanging across the restaurant. I took a lemon flavoured ice cream -- really liked it. The parlour is called Dolcetti Gelato. Thereafter, while returning to take the car, we found two persons sitting on outdoor chairs, with old manual typewriters on makeshift tables. They were typing out exactly the same way I used to in 1980s to do my stories before faxing them from Moscow to Patriot office in Delhi.

Search This Blog