Skip to main content

Villagers oppose Gujarat government "decision" to acquire their land off Narmada for tourism purpose

The protest meeting. Pix Rohit Prajapati
By Our Representative
Fearing forcible acquisition of land for tourism purpose, a villagers’ meeting near Kevadia colony, the site of the Narmada dam, has taken the pledge that they would not part with their “land, forest and river”, sought to be “snatched away by the state and the authority”. The pledge, taken on the 114th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi on the bank of the river Narmada, added, “We the working people collectively resolve that the forest, land, and the river are a lifeline for us which are our heritage handed down to us by our ancestors. It is our duty to protect our heritage for which we have organized ourselves. The state and authority want to snatch away our land, forest and river in the name of development.”
The meeting took place against the backdrop of the Gujarat government’s strongly-worded letter to sarpanches of 50-odd villages to either comply by its decision to include their land as part of the Kevadia Area Development Authority’s (KADA’s) plan to convert the area around the Narmada dam into a high-profile tourism spot or face consequences. The letter was written in March 2013 by the chief executive officer of KADA, which comes directly under the state urban development department.
On October 1, the state government tried to do some damage control exercise ahead of the villagers’ meeting, which took place on at Indravarna village. The officials, who called sarpanches of these villages, told the sarpanches called for an urgent get-together at Shoolpaneshwar temple on Narmada river’s bank, that they wanted to clear some “misapprehensions.” However, as the sarpanches failed to get a satisfactory answer, the villagers continued with their meeting.
Moderated by Narendrabhai with Rameshbhai from Indravarna village, Nareshbhai Tadvi from Kevadia, Rameshbhai Tadvi from Khadagda, Ranchodbhai from Sakva, Ansuyaben and Dhakalbhai from
Dharmapur, Dakshaben Tadvi from Pichipura, Lakhan Mussafir, the meeting was attended by several activists, including Aditi Chanchani, a researcher with Equations, which is an NGO which works on tourism issues and social impact assessment; Rajesh Mishra of Arch-Vahini, which is working among tribals of the area; and Badribhai Joshi, an eminent Gandhian fighting for farmer's rights.
Policemen stop people from going to the meeting
Representatives from other NGOs which were present on the occasion were Gujarat Sarvodaya Mandal, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Sahiyar, Jyoti Karmachari Mandal, People's Union for Civil Liberties, people from Dangs and Manviya Technology Forum.
A statement issued at the end of the meeting said, “The speakers raised various issues linked to how can we trust the government to do justice to 70 villages when the issue of the six villages since 1961 remain unresolved.” The reference was to the six villagers whose land was taken away to build the Narmada dam. Of the 70 villagers, 16 are such which have already been included in KADA, while the rest are allegedly facing the “threat” from KADA.
The statement quoted the villagers as saying that they do not want their children to work as labourers in hotels and their womenfolk to be involve in sex work – “these along with other concerns were raised on the nature of tourism that these developments will bring with it.” Especially taking strong exception to a huge police force called at the meeting venue, the statement said, “The progressive people and organizations of Gujarat should ask a question to the state machinery was the police force mobilized for law and order or create terror and threat among people to suppress their concerns.”
It added, “A huge police force of men and women was mobilized by the state to create an atmosphere of terror and threat among the villagers to prevent them from reaching the place of the meeting where they were to discuss and raise their grievances against KADA. Even photographs and video was taken of the villagers who were on their way to the venue of the meeting to scare them. When people are ready for a dialogue with the authority, why are the voices now being suppressed?”
The statement further said, “On October 1, 2013, the district collector and KADA authorities organized an urgent meeting with sarpanches, panchayat members and the talatis (lowest level revenue officials) to indirectly communicate to the people not to join the meeting. In spite of these efforts by the state and KADA authority, over 1200 people from the villages attended the meeting and resolved to fight back this inhuman and unconstitutional action.”
The statement regretted that though chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd, chairman and CEO of KADA, and the Narmada district collector were invited for a dialogue at the meeting in order to present their views before the villagers, the authorities reacted with police force being sent on the spot of the meeting. “We regret to state that they chose to remain absent from the meeting, which is unfortunate”, it added.

Comments

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

ASI has 'no funds' to protect five centuries old Goa church, a World Heritage Site

Counterview Desk
The century-old All-India Catholic Union (AICU), the largest Laity movement in Asia, has blamed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for neglecting the historic Bom Jesu church by keeping its ceilings  open to the vagaries weather, with no steps  taken to protect the five century old monument from damage on account of impending rains on the lame excuse that there are "no funds". In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, AICU simultaneously asks the Government of India to devise a "comprehensive" national social security safety net, universal health Insurance and medical Infrastructure so that the “calamity” that has befalenl millions of migrant labour and jobless rural and urban poor in “the Covid pandemic-driven lockdown is “never repeated.”

Withdraw sedition charges against three young women activists: 1100 feminists

Counterview Desk
About 1,100 feminists from all over India – organisations and individuals across religion, class, caste, ethnicity, ability, sexuality and genders – have issued a solidarity statement condemning what they have called “the targeted crackdown on Muslims and women activists in Delhi”, who were at the forefront of protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC) and National Population Register (NPR).

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Tablighis or Namaste Trump? Rupani must 'clarify' on origin of Covid-19 in Gujarat

By Mujahid Nafees* In his video communication on April 24, 2020, chief minister Vijay Rupani informed us that in the month of March the Gujarat government had quarantined 6,000 people returning from abroad in order to prevent the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. He further asserted that the spread of Covid-19 was caused by the tablighis returning from Nizamuddin in Delhi. His statements were widely publicized and given front page coverage by some local dailies.

Coping with Covid-19? Options before small, marginal farmers of rainfed regions

By Biswanath Sinha, Kuntal Mukherjee*
The global crisis due to Covid-19 has hit after reaching in western Europe. India’s response to curtail the spread of the disease was quite decisive. It announced a Janata curfew on the March 22, followed by a complete national lockdown from the midnight of March 24.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”