Skip to main content

Gujarat govt can't hope to collect more than 10% of the iron needed for Sardar Statue

By Rajiv Shah
Even as Gujarat’s powerful babudom is gearing up for the high-profile stone laying ceremony on October 31, birth anniversary of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, for the so-called Statue of Unity, proposed as the tallest statue of the world, insiders close to chief minister Narendra Modi doubted if his idea of getting iron from farmers from all over the country in order to build its structure would ever succeed. A senior official, refusing to be named, suggested, even Modi believes that even the most ideal scenario it would not be possible to collect more than 700 tonnes of iron.
“This became clear in an internal meeting. We concluded that even if 200 to 250 tonnes of iron is collected, that would be enough”, the official said, adding, “This is at best ten per cent of the iron actually needed to build the statue – an estimate of 2,500 tonnes of iron.” Saying that iron collection, to be undertaken after Modi’s October 31 rally at Kevadia Colony, off Narmada Dam, would be “largely a symbolic and a political gesture”, the official said, rest of the iron would have to be bought from the open market. Babus have been asked to fan out to different states to organize iron collection, starting in November.
The estimated cost of the Statue of Unity – which Gujarat-based activists have wittingly described as “Statue of Disunity” because it would involve a tourism project by acquiring tribals’ farm land of 70-odd villages – worked out about two years ago is Rs 2,500 crore. Officials say, while the corporates have been asked to contribute, “it is doubtful they will be able to give much. Hence, we would have to budget the whole project. Even if we provide Rs 500 crore per year, which is not much, the project would be completed in the next four-and-a-half years. Tenders have been floated, and the developer will be selected soon.”
Notably, Gujarat government sources say, the earlier apprehension that the iron collected from the farmers would “not be used in the statue, but in the railings and other small beautification projects to be taken up around the Statue of Unity, has been put at rest.” They added, “We have taken technical opinion in the matter. The iron so collected from the farmers can be used in the statue itself. Of course, it will have to be properly processed and melted before it is being used.”
Apprehensions on quality of iron were expressed by a top Modi aide, who told www.counterview.net June this year (click HERE to see) that the “iron collected from the farmers will obviously be of different types and suspected quality. Some of it may be simply scrap or junk. Obviously, it cannot be used for constructing a quality Sardar statue.” The aide had added, “Quality metal, instead, would be needed for constructing the 182 metre high statue in order to ensure that it lasts for generations to come. Things will become clear once technical consultation of the project is over.”
Meanwhile, a view is emerging among top state bureaucrats that the diversion of the entire babudom into the collection of iron and building the statue – a political requirement of Modi ahead of the 2014 polls – is leading to failure of the state’s Narmada and water resources officials to give enough time to the Narmada project, especially the network of canals, which till date remain largely incomplete. Out of early 18 lakh hectares of land targeted to be cultivated with Narmada waters in Gujarat, a potential for 5.59 hectares (ha) has been created, but the actual irrigation has not been more than 2 lakh hectares.
The view is also emerging that priorities of the Gujarat government have begun to change from agriculture to urban and industrial development. “Already, nearly one million acre feet (MAF) of water out of a total of nearly nine MAF which could be made available from the Narmada dam’s reservoirs is being diverted to industry. About two years ago, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India had already sharply criticized the Gujarat government for using more waters than allocated to industry and urban areas by the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal", an official said.

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor*  Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution. 

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Public money, private profits: Crop insurance scheme as goldmine for corporates

By Vikas Meshram   The farmer in India is not merely a food provider; he is the soul of the nation. For centuries, enduring natural calamities and bearing debt generation after generation while remaining loyal to the soil, this community now finds itself trapped in a different kind of crisis. In February 2016, the Modi government launched the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) with the stated objective of freeing farmers from the shackles of debt. It was an ambitious attempt to provide a strong safety net to cultivators repeatedly devastated by excessive rainfall, drought, and hailstorms.