Skip to main content

PharmEasy: The only online medical store which revises prices upwards after confirming the order

For senior citizens — especially those without a family support system — ordering medicines online can be a great relief. Shruti and I have been doing this for the last couple of years, and with considerable success. We upload a prescription, receive a verification call from a doctor, and within two or three days, the medicines are delivered to our doorstep.
Given the stiff competition among online pharmacies, many of them offer rebates. Some even suggest switching to generic alternatives after we place the order. We sometimes agree, but we always make it clear that we won’t change brands for important medicines without consulting our doctor.
However, with competition has come unethical price manipulation.
In our experience, PharmEasy stands out as the worst offender. They initially attract you with a 27% discount. But after finalizing the cart, it drops to 24%. Even then, we’ve placed orders (we prefer cash on delivery). But after getting a confirmation, and just before dispatching the shipment, they increase the price of the medicines.
This happened to us in late April. We had ordered medicines worth over ₹5,000. While enjoying dosa at our favourite Chennai Express restaurant in Ahmedabad, I received an SMS informing me that the prices had been revised upward. Shocked, I canceled the order and left this review on the PharmEasy app:
> “After I ordered medicines at a certain price, PharmEasy hours later updated and revised the prices upward. Unethical — decided to cancel the order.”
They responded, asking us to email the order number. To our surprise, not only was the order canceled, but PharmEasy also removed the entire order history from our account! Still, on May 1, we emailed them with our phone number to find out if it had been an error.
Since then, we’ve received two responses. One, from Sandhya Nackwal on May 2, explained the revised pricing:
> “The products listed in the app are not linked to a fixed price. Thus, we share the estimated cost at the time of order placement, which can be either higher or lower than the actual price. We send you an SMS or push notification for the total discounted amount once your medicines are procured...”
The reply urged us to be patient and reorder. It added:
> “Sometimes, the MRP of medicines may vary depending on the stock received by the chemist. This variation is always due to manufacturer price changes. However, if the price on the packaging differs from the bill, please share an image highlighting the batch number so we can resolve the issue.”
Later, we received a phone call assuring us that this wouldn’t happen again and urging us to reorder. So we did, on May 3. I also sent another email on May 6:
> “Yours is the only platform that updates the price upwards after the order is placed and billed. Very strange, to say the least. We had to cancel the order twice, and now your representative tells us it won’t happen again, so he revived the cancelled order at the original price. Let’s see what happens now!”
But again, the prices were revised upward. After canceling the second order, we got another phone call with the same assurance. So we placed a third order — tempted by the best rebate.
This time, the total payable amount had gone down. Suspicious, I checked and realized they had simply reduced the quantity of medicines we had ordered while raising the prices of the rest. We canceled again and left this updated review:
> “Am forced to edit my review. Twice, after I ordered medicines, PharmEasy revised prices upward before delivery. Third time, they reduced the total amount but also reduced the number of medicines, while increasing some prices. Unethical, untrustworthy. Have canceled for the third time...”
It’s now been two weeks, and we keep getting calls from PharmEasy representatives. We hang up the moment we realize it’s them.
Out of curiosity, I browsed the app’s review section. To my dismay — but not surprise — many others have faced the same issue.
Prashant Arya (April 23):
> “I recently purchased a pharmaceutical product from this platform, and unfortunately, my experience was disappointing. The listed price was ₹80, but the final bill showed ₹100. Plus, additional platform fees made the overall cost even higher. The advertised price does not reflect the actual cost at checkout. Misleading and frustrating.”
M Mohan (January 18):
> “Prices changed between adding items to the cart and checkout. Discounts were shown initially but vanished later. Customer support was poor and unhelpful.”
Namrata Behera (April 30):
> “Most products are listed at a fair price, but at checkout, the price increases…”
Vedant Mule (May 12):
> “Don’t use this app. There’s a huge difference in the price shown on the product page and the cart…"
Each of these users gave a one-star rating. I don’t know whether PharmEasy is losing customers. Maybe not — they claim to have over four crore “satisfied” customers. Perhaps that’s why they don’t care about negative reviews.
But I still wonder: has PharmEasy ever tried to find out why no other app makes such bizarre upward price revisions after confirming an order?

Comments

TRENDING

Dalit rights and political tensions: Why is Mevani at odds with Congress leadership?

While I have known Jignesh Mevani, one of the dozen-odd Congress MLAs from Gujarat, ever since my Gandhinagar days—when he was a young activist aligned with well-known human rights lawyer Mukul Sinha’s organisation, Jan Sangharsh Manch—he became famous following the July 2016 Una Dalit atrocity, in which seven members of a family were brutally assaulted by self-proclaimed cow vigilantes while skinning a dead cow, a traditional occupation among Dalits.  

Global NGO slams India for media clampdown during conflict, downplays Pakistan

A global civil rights group, Civicus has taken strong exception to how critical commentaries during the “recent conflict” with Pakistan were censored in India, with journalists getting “targeted”. I have no quarrel with the Civicus view, as the facts mentioned in it are all true.

Whither SCOPE? Twelve years on, Gujarat’s official English remains frozen in time

While writing my previous blog on how and why Narendra Modi went out of his way to promote English when he was Gujarat chief minister — despite opposition from people in the Sangh Parivar — I came across an interesting write-up by Aakar Patel, a well-known name among journalists and civil society circles.

Remembering Vijay Rupani: A quiet BJP leader who listened beyond party lines

Late evening on June 12, a senior sociologist of Indian origin, who lives in Vienna, asked me a pointed question: Of the 241 persons who died as a result of the devastating plane crash in Ahmedabad the other day, did I know anyone? I had no hesitation in telling her: former Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, whom I described to her as "one of the more sensible persons in the BJP leadership."

Unchecked urbanisation, waste dumping: Study warns of 'invited disaster' as khadi floods threaten half of Surat

An action research report, “Invited Disaster: Khadi Floods in Surat City”, published by two civil rights groups, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti and the People's Union for Civil Liberties, Surat, states that nearly half of Gujarat's top urban conglomerate—known for its concentration of textile and diamond polishing industries—is affected by the dumping of debris and solid waste, along with the release of treated and untreated sewage into the khadis (rivulets), thereby increasing the risk of flood disaster.

Polymath academy or echo chamber? A personal take on knowledge, control, and WhatsApp moderation

A few months back, I was made a member of a WhatsApp group called Polymath Academy. Frankly, I didn’t know what the word polymath meant until its administrator, veteran Gujarat-based sociologist Vidyut Joshi — with whom I have been interacting since the mid-1990s when he was with the Gandhi Labour Institute — told me it refers to a person with an exceptional academic record.

Two decades on, hunger still haunts Gujarat: Survey exposes stark gap behind poverty claims

A Niti Aayog report , released about two years ago, estimated that in Gujarat — which our powers-that-be have long considered a model state — 11.66% of people are "multidimensionally poor," a term referring to an index that seeks to estimate "multiple and simultaneous deprivations" at the household level across three macro categories: health, education, and living standards.

English proficiency for empowerment: Modi’s SCOPE vision contrasts Amit Shah’s remark

While Union Home Minister Amit Shah may have asserted that soon a time would come when those speaking English in the country would “feel ashamed”, it is ironic that Narendra Modi, when he was Gujarat chief minister, had launched what was called the SCOPE programme, actively involving the University of Cambridge to provide opportunities to the youth of Gujarat to "become not just job seekers but job creators (entrepreneurs)."

Whither whistleblower concerns? Air India crash: Govt of India report suggests human error

Is the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India, seeking to bail out Boeing in its preliminary report released recently despite the top MNC's whistleblower concerns ? It would seem so, if the Ministry's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB's) preliminary findings into the catastrophic crash of Air India’s Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, registration VT-ANB, which went down shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad on 12 June 2025, killing all 241 on board and 19 on the ground, is any indication.