Skip to main content

India's GDP to grow only by 6% till 2021-22, as demonetisation impacts consumption, delays investment: CMIE

By A Representative
In a prediction which has stunned India's top policy makers, the powerful consulting firm, Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), has said that India’s real gross domestic product (GDP) growth would slip to 6% in 2016-17, and would remain “about 6% per annum for the next five years.”
Insisting that “demonetisation shock” has caused “sustained downturn” of the Indian economy, which was “expected to gradually accelerate its real GDP growth rate from 7.5% to over 8% per annum”, CMIE, which is a premier data dissemination and analysis institute of the country, says that “the immediate impact of demonetisation was a sharp reduction in private final consumption expenditure.”
This, it says, has accompanied with “a corresponding fall in retail prices of perishable commodities, a substantive dislocation of labour and corresponding losses in wages and a break-down of supply chains in many parts”, adding, this happened because of declined availability of "cash on hand to transact retail purchases" following the removal of 86% of the currency in circulation.”
“The cash to GDP ratio is high at 12% and reportedly over 90% of the transactions in India are cash based. As a result, the sudden and sharp reduction in currency had an immediate and significant impact on consumption expenditure”, says Mahesh Vyas, Managing Director, CMIE.
“Labour has been dislocated from productive work as they were forced to line up in front of banks to convert their old currency notes into new ones”, CMIE says, adding, “Given that banks did not have sufficient new currency notes, this led to substantial dislocation of labour and a corresponding loss of wages.”
“The fall in consumer demand combined with fall in availability of cash also led to a fall in the demand for labour. This sets in a vicious cycle of low demand for labour and low consumption expenditure”, CMIE says, adding, the low demand will “persist” till “liquidity is fully restored, confidence in liquidity is fully restored, and “consumers are yanked out of their equilibrium at lower levels of consumption of non-essential commodities. ”
Predicting that “none of these conditions are expected to be fulfilled in a hurry”, CMIE believes, things are unlikely to improve also because the Rs 2000 note is unlikely to restore confidence among consumers for quite some time because the government or Reserve Bank of India (RBI) “have not taken steps to scotch rumours of demonetisation of the note.”
“As a result, the effective liquidity in the markets is much lower than is measured by the issuance of new currency notes. The Rs 2000 note is less liquid than it would be without the rumours regarding its lifespan”, it adds.
“Further”, says CMIE, “A flight from currency in hand to other asset forms because of a fear of potential loss of liquidity through further demonetisation and a fear of raids or enquiries, could structurally reduce the propensity to spend on consumption goods.”
“As a result”, notes the top firm, “We expect the hit on consumer spending to last much longer than just a few quarters. Private final consumption expenditure (PFCE) grew 7.5% in 2015-16. We had PFCE expected growth to accelerate to 7.8% in 2016-17 and then to over 8% going forward. Now, we have scaled back the PFCE growth estimate to 5.5% for 2016-17 and to 6.8% per annum going forward.”
While, CMIE says, it does expect government spending to “offset part of the impact of demonetisation through increased spending”, it insists, “But, government has a smaller role and can contain the damage only partially.”
“This trend shift in consumption expenditure will delay a revival in investments”, says CMIE, adding, “We expect capital formation to shrink by nearly 2% in 2016-17 as against an earlier expectation of a 2.3% increase in the same.”

Comments

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike. 

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay.