Skip to main content

PUCL rejects bias allegations, reaffirms tribunal’s goal of peace, reconciliation in Manipur

By A Representative
 
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has issued a comprehensive response to the concerns raised by Inner Manipur MP Dr. Angomcha Bimol Akoijam (photo) regarding the “Independent People’s Tribunal on the Ongoing Ethnic Conflict in Manipur” report. In their statement dated August 28, 2025, PUCL President Kavita Srivastava and General Secretary Dr. V. Suresh welcomed the parliamentarian’s call for dialogue, while firmly rejecting allegations that the Tribunal’s findings were biased.
“We would like to reiterate that the aim of the IPT is not to widen divisions but to create a context for peace and reconciliation in Manipur,” PUCL said, stressing that the report was intended to provide a platform for victims and survivors to be heard. The organisation explained that testimonies collected over several months from different communities—including Meiteis, Kukis, Nagas, Pangals and others—formed the backbone of the report. 
“The observations and findings of the tribunal are based on the voices of the survivors and deponents from various communities … Not a single person was turned away from providing their testimonies,” the response stated.
Rejecting the charge that the report implied collusion between Meiteis and the Union government, PUCL clarified: “There is nothing in the sentences or paragraph to arrive at the entirely unsupported conclusion drawn that the sentence means to say that the ‘majority’ Meitei community got into some kind of understanding with Amit Shah to attack ‘Christian minority tribal’ in a planned manner. Nowhere else in the report also is any such a claim made.”
It noted that the relevant section of the report only recorded the “widespread anger at Union Home Minister Amit Shah for what is seen as a betrayal. Promises made were not kept. Women, in particular, feel they were used at the peak of the conflict and then excluded from peace efforts.”
On criticism of including Suspension of Operations (SoO) groups in the dialogue process, PUCL said this was a practical necessity. “True dialogue must bring hostile parties face to face and must include all SoO groups if it is to have legitimacy on the Kuki side. Above all, there must be accountability,” it quoted directly from the Tribunal’s conclusions.
The organisation admitted that the executive summary could not fully reflect the depth of findings, but urged that the full text be studied before conclusions were drawn. “Our commitment is for the truth to be uncovered and prevail, however difficult it is, as only through truthful recounting of facts and events can justice and peace prevail and the process of reconciliation begin,” the letter said.
Highlighting the plight of nearly 60,000 internally displaced people in relief camps, PUCL drew attention to “serious health and medical crisis issues in the camps affecting pregnant women, women, elderly, children and the differently abled or challenged people. Worse is the mental health issue which is not being talked about or addressed at all.”
Concluding the response, PUCL reiterated its willingness to remain part of a democratic peace initiative. “Speaking for PUCL, we will always remain available to share our expertise and knowledge resources with the process of peace and reconciliation in Manipur,” Srivastava and Suresh said, adding that the Tribunal’s recommendations provided a framework for urgent humanitarian and long-term reconciliation efforts.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.