Skip to main content

Enron deal and the poet-politician: Continuing legacy of Vajpayee's wavering Swadeshi stance

By Prof. Hemantkumar Shah* 
After the Lok Sabha elections in 1996, the BJP-led coalition government was formed for the first time under the leadership of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. At that time, Shankar Dayal Sharma was the President. He invited Vajpayee to form the government because the BJP had emerged as the single-largest party in the Lok Sabha elections. Sharma had asked Vajpayee to prove his majority in the Lok Sabha.
However, Vajpayee was unable to prove his majority in the Lok Sabha. As a result, he had to resign after serving as prime minister for only 13 days.
During its short, 13-day tenure, the government held its first and last cabinet meeting on June 1, where it conducted only two tasks:
 * Passing a resolution for the government's resignation.
 * Granting approval to the American company Enron for a power plant in Dabhol, Maharashtra.
For Vajpayee, in that single cabinet meeting, nothing seemed more important for the country than approving a power plant for the Enron company! This was Vajpayee's unwavering devotion to 'Swadeshi' (a term for self-reliance and local production).
At that time, the RSS's Swadeshi Jagaran Manch (SJM) had already been established, and the SJM had blown the bugle of the Swadeshi movement against the Narasimha Rao government. Despite this, there is no public record of the RSS or the SJM making any statement against Vajpayee's decision. Vajpayee was a prominent RSS worker. He became prime minister again in 1998 and served until 2004. For six years, this "devotee of foreign companies," Vajpayee, had the full support of the RSS.
If we say that Manmohan Singh "laid out a red carpet" for foreign companies, then it can also be said that Vajpayee "ran to welcome foreign companies" on that red carpet! This is a matter of historical record and can be proven with data.
Here is another event: A meeting for the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) was held in the city of Marrakesh, Morocco, on April 14-15, 1994. Pranab Mukherjee, as the Commerce Minister for the Narasimha Rao government, went there to sign.
Exactly one week before that, on April 8, 1994, in a press conference in Delhi, Vajpayee had said, "If the BJP comes to power, India will withdraw from the WTO."
Later, Vajpayee served as prime minister for six years from 1998 to 2004, but he seemed to have forgotten this statement. He was a poet, so it was natural for him to forget! I also don't recall the RSS or the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch ever reminding the poet prime minister of his promise.
Both of these events show how dear foreign companies are to the BJP. The Swadeshi Jagaran Manch still exists, and Narendra Modi simultaneously sings the song of 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' (Self-reliant India) and invites foreign companies!
Intelligent people should accept these two facts. It's natural for blind followers to not see any facts.
---
*Senior economist based in Ahmedabad 

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.