Skip to main content

Indian corporates have enough cash; do they have will to invest in manufacturing?

By N.S. Venkataraman
The Chairman of the State Bank of India recently stated that the corporate sector in India is holding significant cash balances. Internal estimates of the bank put this at Rs. 13.5 trillion, suggesting that corporates have enough internal resources to fund capital expenditure and project investments. With investors showing enthusiasm for subscribing to public issues, there appears to be no shortage of funds for new manufacturing ventures.
While this observation is timely, the reality is that investment in manufacturing is not happening at the scale required. This should be a matter of deep concern for Prime Minister Modi and his government, as the Prime Minister has consistently stressed the importance of Atmanirbhar Bharat and the need to strengthen India’s manufacturing base.
Interestingly, former U.S. President Donald Trump, through measures such as the imposition of a 50% tariff on Indian exports and restrictions on H1B visas, has inadvertently done India a service. His policies forced Indians to rethink their dependence on foreign opportunities and recognize the urgency of becoming self-reliant. For decades, millions of Indians have aspired to migrate to the U.S. for jobs, permanent residency, and eventual citizenship, attracted by the country’s prosperity. Yet, the rise of protests and hostility toward migrants in the U.S., Canada, and parts of Europe has made many realize that alien soil can never be more secure or dignified than one’s own. This realization, even if belated, underlines the necessity of building strength at home.
India’s only meaningful response to this “shock treatment” is to rekindle national pride and strengthen the domestic manufacturing base. A robust industrial sector would reduce import dependence and enhance export competitiveness. Despite India’s rapid economic growth, which has made it the world’s fourth-largest economy, this growth has been powered primarily by services rather than manufacturing. While services are valuable, they are more vulnerable to global pressures, unlike manufacturing, which has the potential to provide stability, job creation, and consumption-led growth. A strong manufacturing ecosystem inevitably expands the domestic consumer base in tandem with GDP growth.
Currently, India’s dependence on imports is unacceptably high in several areas, including pharmaceuticals (active pharmaceutical ingredients), bulk chemicals, fertilizers, renewable energy inputs, and, most critically, crude oil and natural gas. Imports in these sectors continue to grow annually at 6–7%. Yet, a careful product-by-product review suggests that many of these imports could be substituted with domestic production if appropriate strategies were adopted with determination.
Technology remains the major constraint. India’s dependence on imported technology is substantial, underscoring the urgent need to strengthen the research and development ecosystem. Indian engineers and scientists can make significant contributions if the right environment is created. Reducing imports must be accompanied by an equally strong push to boost exports. For that, India needs strong global trading houses—an area where the country is still lacking.
The Government of India has been reasonably proactive, but Indian corporates, despite their strong cash reserves, have so far shown little inclination to rise to this challenge. The absence of significant corporate efforts to respond to Prime Minister Modi’s call for investment in manufacturing and R&D is striking.
It is imperative that India’s corporate leaders come together to set broad strategies, adopt time-bound targets for building manufacturing capacity, strengthen R&D, and pursue global competitiveness through exports. This requires greater cooperation among corporate houses, even in areas where they compete, to share investments, technologies, and market access. Such collaboration is common globally, where competitors often join forces in select areas to achieve mutual benefit and speedier results.
Indian corporates today have the financial resources. What they need to demonstrate is the will. Unless they rise to the occasion, India risks continuing as a services-dominated economy vulnerable to external shocks, rather than building the manufacturing backbone that can secure long-term self-reliance and prosperity.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

Anonymous said…
You are very true - Indian corporates have to and they have the resources to invest more in industry and re-search - Panicker

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.