Experts urge GST council to classify ultra-processed foods as demerit goods

By A Representative

The Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi), a group of doctors, public health experts, and nutrition advocates, has written to Union Finance Minister and GST Council Chairperson Nirmala Sitharaman seeking the classification of foods high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) and ultra-processed foods (UPFs) as “demerit goods” under the Goods and Services Tax regime. In a letter ahead of the GST Council meeting scheduled for September 3–4, 2025, the group recommended placing HFSS and UPFs in the highest GST slab of 28 percent or more, citing their established links to obesity, diabetes, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs).

The letter noted that over 56.4 percent of deaths in India are linked to unhealthy diets, as highlighted in the 2024 Dietary Guidelines for Indians issued by the ICMR–National Institute of Nutrition. It also pointed to the Economic Survey of 2024–25, which flagged the rising economic burden of NCDs and identified dietary risks from UPFs as a major factor. The Union Health Ministry and Health Minister J.P. Nadda have also drawn attention to the vulnerability of children to unhealthy food marketing, the letter stated.

Citing data from Euromonitor, the group said UPF consumption in India has surged from USD 900 million in 2006 to USD 37 billion in 2019, while obesity and diabetes rates have shown a parallel rise. It argued that unprocessed and minimally processed foods remain expensive, driving people toward cheaper UPFs. NAPi suggested that higher GST on these products would discourage consumption, while revenues could be earmarked for health promotion, nutrition education, and incentives to produce minimally processed foods.

The group drew on international examples to support its recommendations. Mexico’s 2014 tax on sugary drinks and calorie-dense snacks reportedly reduced purchases and encouraged healthier substitutions, while Chile’s 2016 policy of higher taxes combined with front-of-pack warning labels brought down consumption of unhealthy drinks by 24 percent.

NAPi maintained that similar fiscal measures in India could help curb the growing burden of NCDs and strengthen public health systems. The letter was signed by several eminent pediatricians, public health experts, and nutrition advocates, including Dr. Arun Gupta, Dr. Vandana Prasad, Prof. HPS Sachdev, and Ms. Deepika Srivastava, among others. Copies of the letter have also been sent to senior officials in the Finance Ministry, the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, and the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.

Search This Blog