Skip to main content

Activist Shabnam Hashmi steps down: An era of fearless activism comes to a close, but the fight goes on

By A Representative 
Shabnam Hashmi, one of India’s most prominent human rights activists and a tireless campaigner for communal harmony, has announced her retirement from organizational leadership, bringing to a close more than four decades of relentless public life. At 68, Hashmi is stepping down from her role at ANHAD (Act Now for Harmony and Democracy), the organization she founded in 2003 in the aftermath of the Gujarat carnage. While this marks the end of an era in structured activism, she has made it clear that her commitment to social justice will continue as an individual activist.
Born in 1957 into a family that had been deeply involved in India’s freedom struggle and progressive movements, Hashmi grew up in a household where democratic values, gender equality, literature, and the arts shaped her outlook. Her elder brother, Safdar Hashmi, a renowned communist playwright and street theatre activist, was murdered in 1989 while performing a play — a tragedy that became a turning point in her own activist journey. His death led to the formation of SAHMAT (Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust), where Shabnam would dedicate 15 years of her life, using art, theatre, music, and intellectual forums to counter communalism and uphold freedom of expression.
Her activism, however, began much earlier and almost by accident. In the early 1980s, while still pursuing higher studies, she began teaching girls in Nizamuddin Basti in Delhi. What started as a favour to a friend soon became a lifelong commitment after she encountered firsthand the devastating consequences of child marriage and poverty on young girls. Over the next decade, she built a vibrant community education program, helping hundreds of children — many of them first-generation learners — to gain not just literacy but vocational training in fields ranging from tailoring to electrical work.
The Gujarat riots of 2002 marked another watershed in her life. Having spent months in relief and rehabilitation work there, she witnessed up close the entrenched hatred that had consumed entire communities. It was then that she realized the limits of cultural and intellectual resistance and felt the urgent need to counter communal propaganda at the grassroots. This realization gave birth to ANHAD in 2003, co-founded with historian K.N. Panikkar and activist Harsh Mander. From its inception, ANHAD set out to fight the “battle of hearts and minds,” building secular cadres, organizing training camps for young people, and using culture, dialogue, and direct engagement to dismantle prejudice.
Over the years, ANHAD became a crucial platform for peace-building, working in states like Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Jammu & Kashmir. It spearheaded innovative campaigns like “Mere Ghar Aake To Dekho” (Come, Visit My Home), which encouraged people across religions to visit each other’s homes, breaking stereotypes and fostering trust. It organized extensive training programs on the Constitution, communalism, gender justice, and caste discrimination, reaching tens of thousands of students, youth, and grassroots workers. Cultural interventions, from street theatre to film screenings, became central to its work, reinforcing Hashmi’s conviction that emotional connections and shared experiences were essential to challenge divisive ideologies.
But her activism was not confined to community campaigns. Hashmi also waged a historic legal battle in the Supreme Court for adoption rights, triggered by her own struggle to formally adopt a daughter. In 2014, the Court ruled that Muslims and Christians could adopt children under the secular Juvenile Justice Act, a landmark decision that opened doors for countless families across religious lines. This case exemplified her strategic legal acumen — choosing to push for secular reforms through existing laws rather than polarizing debates like the Uniform Civil Code.
Her journey, however, has not been without formidable challenges. Hashmi has been repeatedly targeted by smear campaigns, state hostility, and even physical violence. In 2014, while campaigning in Rae Bareli, she was attacked by a mob of political workers, threatened with rape, and denied police protection. Her organization, ANHAD, was stripped of its foreign funding license in 2015, and Indian donors faced intimidation through tax notices, forcing the group to shrink operations drastically. Yet, Hashmi and her colleagues kept ANHAD alive through personal donations and sheer determination, often working with minimal resources.
In 2017, in a dramatic act of protest, she returned the National Minority Rights Award conferred on her in 2008, denouncing the government’s silence on mob lynchings and rising Islamophobia. She accused the state of tacitly encouraging hate crimes and vowed not to be complicit by holding onto an award while minorities lived in fear. On the other hand, her work earned international recognition, including the “Woman of the Decade” award by the Women Economic Forum in 2022, reflecting the duality of her public life — celebrated abroad but harassed at home.
Her critics often accused her of being “anti-national” or biased, but she wore these labels as badges of honour, insisting that fighting for pluralism and constitutional values was the highest form of patriotism. She was equally unafraid to challenge regressive tendencies within minority communities, questioning patriarchal practices and insisting that true equality demanded critical introspection as well as resistance to majoritarianism.
Now, as she steps down from ANHAD’s leadership after 22 years, she has said the time has come to hand over the reins to younger activists who can bring fresh perspectives and energy to the struggle. “We need new ideas, new leadership, and the fearlessness of youth,” she remarked, underscoring her belief that the fight against fascism and communalism is generational and must constantly renew itself. Yet, her withdrawal from organizational responsibilities does not mean retreat. She has affirmed that she will continue to work as an independent activist, speaking out, mobilizing, and supporting struggles wherever needed.
The significance of her retirement lies not in the end of her activism but in the closing of a chapter that defined an entire era of Indian civil society. At a time when dissent is increasingly criminalized and spaces for independent organizations are shrinking, her resilience stands as both an inspiration and a challenge to the next generation. For thousands who trained with ANHAD, marched in its campaigns, or were touched by its interventions, Shabnam Hashmi’s name remains synonymous with fearless resistance.
Her life’s work has been guided by one central conviction: that the idea of India, as envisioned in the Constitution — diverse, plural, equal — must be defended at all costs. Whether teaching in a basti, organizing a nightlong concert in Ayodhya, training young activists in Gujarat, or standing before the Supreme Court, she has always carried that conviction into action. Her words continue to resonate: “If we have to die, let’s die fighting. If we fight together, we can defeat them as we defeated the British. Fascism will be defeated if the people of this country unite.”
As she passes the torch to the younger generation, her legacy will remain etched in the memory of India’s democratic struggles. Shabnam Hashmi may have retired from running an organization, but her voice, her defiance, and her vision for an equal India ensure that her activism is far from over.

Comments

TRENDING

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto   On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes. 

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.