Skip to main content

Beyond decline: The enduring case for Leftist movements

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak
 
Commentators from liberal and right-wing circles often argue that leftist politics has lost its ideological relevance and must reform to regain electoral significance. Despite setbacks, leftist movements continue to identify imperialism and capitalism as systems that conflict with the interests of working people and environmental sustainability.
Critics claim that leftist politics is limited in scope and inherently anti-democratic. Political elites and mainstream media frequently dismiss leftist positions, especially when they advocate for structural change or support marginalized communities. These perspectives are often criticized as being opposed to economic growth and resistant to development.
The left has made errors in its history, but it has also adapted and revised its approach. Capitalism, by contrast, is marked by recurring crises and maintains structures based on exploitation. While the left faces organizational and electoral challenges, it continues to engage in political activism, including through trade unions and various associations, to promote democratic rights and social justice.
Leftist ideology evolves in response to changes in science, technology, and material conditions. In contrast, capitalism and imperialism often rely on coercive methods to maintain control. The left emphasizes cooperation, solidarity, and human dignity.
Many of the left’s critiques—of feudalism, patriarchy, capitalism, and imperialism—remain relevant. Its analysis of inequality across gender, class, race, caste, and sexuality continues to resonate, especially as global conflicts and economic pressures affect working populations.
Political figures such as Trump, Starmer, and Netanyahu are seen by some as products of systems that prioritize elite interests. These systems often resist alternatives to capitalism through military interventions or economic sanctions. The goal, critics argue, is to preserve capitalism as the dominant global framework.
Capitalism has formed alliances with various political and ideological forces to create divisions among people and weaken collective resistance. These divisions—based on nationality, race, religion, and other identities—can undermine efforts to challenge existing power structures. As long as inequality and exploitation persist, leftist politics will remain active.
The struggle against capitalism and imperialism is increasingly framed not only as a political issue but as a broader effort to protect human life and the environment. These systems affect people across all social categories. Therefore, opposition to them is viewed by some as essential to safeguarding collective well-being.
Despite predictions of its decline, leftist politics continues to emerge through grassroots movements and social struggles. Historical patterns suggest that efforts to shape more equitable societies often arise from such movements, even in the face of opposition.

Comments

TRENDING

India’s power paradox: Why the AI boom and climate crisis demand a distributed energy revolution

By Shankar Sharma*  India has achieved historic milestones in power sector capacity addition over the past decade. Yet, beneath the surface of these record numbers, an unprecedented confluence of structural demand shifts and climate-induced supply volatility is testing the absolute limits of our national grid. 

Arrests of Odisha activists raise wider concerns over criminalisation of dissent: CASR

By A Representative   A coalition of civil liberties, human rights, student, labour organisations,  Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), has condemned the arrest of Dr. Randall Sequeira, a doctor providing healthcare in Odisha’s Kalahandi and Rayagada districts, and Laxman Nayak, an activist associated with the Maa Mati Mali Surakhya Manch, and demanded their immediate release.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.