Skip to main content

Hindu diaspora group condemns Trump’s move to take control of D.C. Police, warns of global authoritarian trend

By A Representative
 
Hindus for Human Rights, a U.S.-based advocacy group of the Hindu diaspora, has sharply condemned President Donald Trump’s decision to invoke Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to assume direct federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department. The group said the move not only undermines local democracy in Washington, D.C., but also reflects a wider global trend of authoritarian governments consolidating power by weakening democratic institutions.
“President Trump’s decision to invoke Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to take direct federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department is more than a local power grab—it’s part of a global pattern,” the group declared. “Across the world, authoritarians consolidate power by weakening local democracy, exerting control over police forces, and criminalizing dissent. We’ve seen it in India under the BJP government, in Israel’s militarization of occupied territories, and in other countries where central authorities use ‘security’ as a pretext for repression.”
The White House has defended the rare measure, saying it was necessary to restore “law and order” as protests and unrest continue in Washington. But Hindus for Human Rights argued that such justifications mirror tactics used by governments abroad that suppress opposition movements and expand centralized power.
“This is not about keeping people safe,” the group’s statement continued. “If it were, the White House would be investing in the real infrastructure of safety: housing, jobs, health care, restorative justice, alleviating poverty, and grassroots-led violence prevention. Instead, the message is clear—critics will be met with force, and communities who do not align with the administration’s politics can expect to have their autonomy stripped away overnight.”
The organization drew on Hindu ethical traditions to underscore its critique. “In Hindu tradition, the rightful use of power is bound by dharma—a personal responsibility towards justice, accountability, and the protection of the vulnerable. Centralizing armed force without the consent of the people violates this principle and increases the risk of harm to those already targeted by systemic racism, poverty, and displacement.”
The decision has also renewed debates over Washington, D.C.’s lack of statehood. With more than 700,000 residents, many of them Black communities who remain unrepresented in Congress, critics argue that the takeover highlights the fragility of local autonomy under federal oversight.
Hindus for Human Rights linked Trump’s action to a global drift toward authoritarianism, citing the erosion of democratic norms in India, the entrenchment of military control in Israel, and similar trends in other nations. “Washington, D.C. is not a pawn in a political game; it is a community of more than 700,000 people – many of them unrepresented Black communities – who deserve full rights, representation, and the power to decide their own future,” the statement read. “We stand in solidarity with the people of D.C. and with communities worldwide resisting authoritarian overreach. Real safety comes from deep democracy—not from the heavy hand of repression.”

Comments

TRENDING

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto   On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes. 

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.