Skip to main content

Islam is bigger than labels: Why's there need to embrace the Qur’an's inclusive spirit

By Mike Mohamed Ghouse*  
Farrukh Shaikh, a citizen who lives in  Dallas, has said, “This is a warning to all Muslims in this forum that Mike Ghouse’s religion is not Islam; he is Ismaili and a misguided person. If anyone needs more information about his religion, please let me know.”
Really? Aren’t Ismailis Muslims? So are Sunnis, Shi’as, Bohras, Ahmadis, Sufis, the WD Mohammed group, and many others. It is disheartening to see some Muslims diminish the universality of Islam. Islam is as vast as the sky, encompassing all of God’s creation. It is He who placed us in different tribes, communities, races, ethnicities, and nations, and I would even include other religions (49:13). Learning to respect and accept that uniqueness is equivalent to honoring the Creator’s choice. This is the message in the very first verse of the first surah, Al-Fatiha, in the very first verse of the last surah, An-Nas, and throughout the Qur’an, where God addresses mankind.
The great scholar Mohammed Asad highlights this idea in his Tafsir, particularly referencing verse 2:62. He states that anyone who believes in God, acknowledges accountability on the Day of Judgment, and cares for God’s creation is considered a Muslim—a submitter to God’s will. I have cited this in my article, “Who is a Muslim, and what is Islam?”
It is important to recognize that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) introduced a progressive way of life—Islam. He abolished cruel practices such as infanticide, proclaimed for the first time in civilizational history that women could own their own businesses and property, propose marriage, and even initiate divorce. He took the steps to abolish slavery and introduced many other progressive values, changing the culture significantly over the course of 23 years. If it is not common sense, then it is not Islam. This was a monumental change, and we should not forget it. Instead, we should continue to promote and advance this spirit of progressiveness.
I wish Farrukh Shaikh had written to me directly instead of circulating misinformation. He could have simply said, “Mike Ghouse is a Muslim, but I’m unsure which denomination he belongs to since I have not verified it. It appears that he belongs to all groups, including Shia, Sunni, Sufi, Bohra, Ahmadiyya, Ismaili, Alawite, and others.” That would have been fair.
Prophet Muhammad knew only one group of people: Muslims. Terms like Sunni, Shia, Ahmadiyya, Bohra, Sufi, Ismaili, WD Muhammad, Alawite, Deobandi, Barelvi, Ahl-e-Hadith, and Ahl-e-Bait did not exist in his time. Different groups or denominations are natural outcomes of societal development. The Prophet understood human nature and even predicted that the singular faith he taught would eventually divide into many strands. He used the metaphorical number seventy-two to symbolize the infinite number of splits that could occur.
His message, however, was one of coexistence and humility. He taught us to live with our differences, to race in doing good, but to avoid arrogance and self-righteousness, which God dislikes. Even a sinner may be forgiven by God for a simple act of kindness—such as giving water to a thirsty dog—especially when extended to fellow humans. Only God knows the full impact of our actions on His creation. Our responsibility is to strive to be good human beings who care for others and for the environment.
Wouldn’t you feel happy if your guests took meticulous care of your property before leaving? Or if your employees ensured your business was intact and well-maintained? Do you really worry whether that employee is Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Christian, or Sikh as long as they fulfill their responsibility with honesty? Likewise, God does not concern Himself with labels; He appreciates our contributions to preserving His creation and restoring harmony through justice, fairness, and kindness.
My Hindu friends will recognize parallels in their own tradition: Brahma the creator, Vishnu the sustainer, and Shiva the recycler. God in Islam is no different—He sustains, restores, and nurtures His creation. The universal question He asks of us is simple: are you good to your fellow beings and to the environment?
The Qur’an is the word of God, but its meanings have been interpreted differently across times and traditions. No one, not even the greatest Imams, can claim their interpretation as the only one. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did not appoint anyone as the sole interpreter of the Qur’an; he simply said, “I am leaving this book with you for your understanding, and you cannot go wrong if you follow it.” The Shia tradition views this differently, and we must respect their interpretation.
If God is kind and merciful, and if the Prophet is described as a mercy to humanity, then the teachings we find in the Qur’an are aimed at universal goodness and inclusivity. Islam is too expansive a religion to exclude anyone. Every faith has followed the natural path of divisions. Christianity branched into Catholicism, Protestantism, and hundreds of denominations. Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Sikhism have also splintered into many schools. Islam too began with one vision, one community, but it evolved into many traditions. The Prophet was aware of this inevitability.
As for me, I have chosen to remain denomination-less. If you hear me pray, it will sound like the Sunni tradition only because I was raised in that environment. If I had been born into a Shia or Ahmadi family, I would have prayed in that manner. It doesn’t make one superior or inferior. Each tradition is precious to the believer. As the saying goes, “Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder; faith is in the heart of the believer.” The Qur’an itself says: “To you is your faith, and to me is my faith.” (109:6).
I am comfortable with every tradition of Muslim prayer. I have visited mosques of almost all denominations, including the three most revered ones in Mecca, Madinah, and Jerusalem. The next place I intend to visit is Karbala, where Imam Hussain stood for justice at the cost of his entire family. Am I following the inclusive, progressive path of the Prophet? Yes, I am. Then why should I limit myself to a label? I am a Muslim, period. I have no walls between me and another Muslim, and no barriers between me and another human being.
The World Muslim Congress was formed with the express purpose of creating space for every Muslim, and the Center for Pluralism was created for all humanity. Over the years, we have conducted 780 hours of radio talk shows and 40 workshops covering traditions from Atheism to Zoroastrianism, and every faith in between. The purpose was to understand each other and reduce tensions. It took years of effort, but that remains my commitment: to create a world where all humanity can get along by knowing each other.
The role of Muslims is not to divide, but to contribute to the well-being of humanity, to nurture goodwill, and to become conflict mitigators. Our goal is to build a secure world where every human can live in peace and dignity. The World Muslim Congress focuses on Muslims’ civic responsibility, not in dividing them by denomination, but in affirming their common faith in God, the Prophet, and accountability. Whoever calls themselves a Muslim is a Muslim to us. And today, we are blessed to have Christians, Hindus, Jews, Baha’is, Sikhs, and Buddhists among us to share their perspectives.
God loves us all. After all, we are His creation, and because He cares about us, He sends guidance to every community—a messenger, a prophet, an avatar, or a peacemaker—to show them how to live in harmony. The Bhagavad Gita phrases it differently but similarly: every time there is chaos in society, someone will emerge to restore righteousness. The Qur’an also affirms that God sent prophets to every nation. The name doesn’t matter; the message is the same: to preserve harmony, peace, and justice.
Islam has always emphasized serving fellow beings. God assures us—not just Muslims—that if we take care of His creation, He will take care of us. That, to me, is the essence of being a Muslim.
---
*Progressive wedding officiant, encourages inter-faith marriage; heads Center for Pluralism, a Washington DC-based non-profit organisation. This is the abridged version of the original blog which appeared in the World Muslim Congress site

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”