Rejoinder: Not true, RSS has no role whatsoever in preparing NCERT textbooks

By Michel Danino*
Prof. Shamsul Islam has been writing mendacious and slanderous articles about the new NCERT Social Science textbooks in Muslim Mirror (click August 8 and August 20). In Counterview these appear to be their shortened versions (August 9 and August 21).
In both articles, Prof. Islam alleges that the new textbooks were prepared under the control of the RSS. This is a baseless claim, and I felt compelled to respond with the following rejoinder:
In these writings, apart from his heavily distorted comments on the new NCERT Social Science textbooks—books he has clearly not read in full—he has indulged in slander, calumny, and language that at times borders on hate speech.
First, his allegation that the new textbooks were prepared “under the influence of RSS” is an outright falsehood. He offers no evidence, because there is none—except in his imagination. I have repeatedly clarified that our team prepared these textbooks without any political or ideological interference.
Our sole mandate was to follow the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP 2020) and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education 2023 (NCF-SE 2023), two major documents designed to bring transformative changes in education. Prof. Islam has evidently not read them. Our team was given full freedom to develop the material, which went through multiple reviews by experts, colleagues, and teachers. The RSS has no role whatsoever in this process.
Secondly, he has sought to demonize me personally as “a Hindutva supporter,” once again without the slightest evidence. I have nothing to do with Hindutva. My academic contributions—many published internationally—are available for all to see on my Academia.edu page.
Impartial readers have often remarked that my work, unlike Prof. Islam’s, presents a diversity of viewpoints before arriving at an argument, and does so in a polite, respectful manner. Much of my work deals with aspects of Indian civilization, which perhaps he regards as a crime.
Lastly, Prof. Islam cannot even get his basic facts right. In his August 20 article, whose shorter version was published in Counterview on August 21, he claims that I “supervised” the recent NCERT modules on Partition. This is entirely false. Neither I nor my Social Science team had anything to do with those modules or others of that kind. In fact, I have not yet even had the opportunity to read them.
It is regrettable that such misrepresentation and abuse is being published, which hardly fits the definition of a “Counterview.”
Counterview's guidelines to contributors state that content “should not be derogatory, should not incite hate.” Publishers, including online platforms such as Counterview, are legally bound to ensure that the material they carry does not contain false, deliberately misleading, slanderous, or defamatory statements.
---
*Guest Professor, Earth Sciences Dept., IIT Gandhinagar. https://es.iitgn.ac.in/faculty/michel-danino, https://iitgn.academia.edu/MichelDanino, https://www.youtube.com/@micheldanino1956

Comments

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria* As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.

Search This Blog