Skip to main content

'Not just a seasonal tragedy': Himalayas cry out against greed-driven development

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
The massive destruction in Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Jammu and Kashmir, and Punjab due to heavy rains is not just a seasonal tragedy—it is nature’s warning. Yet, the enormity of the crisis has barely found space in mainstream media. The silence is troubling. What is unfolding across these states calls for nothing less than the declaration of a national emergency, an immediate halt to reckless so-called “developmental” projects, and a wider democratic debate about the future of our mountains. Sadly, our political class, across party lines, shows no inclination to engage with such fundamental questions.
Instead, we are subjected to spectacles like Union Minister Nitin Gadkari proudly announcing a ropeway project in Kedarnath, as if that were a solution. Meanwhile, the government presses ahead with the widening of the Uttarkashi–Gangotri highway, ignoring repeated warnings from local communities and environmental experts. The arrogance of such actions reflects a dangerous disregard for both ecological wisdom and the voices of the people who live in these fragile zones.
The Himalayan disaster cannot be explained away simply as a “climate crisis.” Of course, climate change is real and demands urgent responses, but to invoke it as a blanket excuse is to wash away our own sins. The deeper cause lies in the state’s unrelenting pursuit of profit-driven policies in the mountains—policies that include the proliferation of large dams in the upper Himalayas, justified under the rhetoric of creating “energy surplus” states. These projects are nothing but acts of greed, disrupting the natural flow of rivers and inviting ecological backlash.
The ferocity of rivers tearing through valleys today reminds us of nature’s unmatched power. Technology, no matter how advanced, is no match against this fury. The only way forward is to respect the Himalayas, to pause and rethink the destructive developmental politics that treats them as mere sites of extraction and exploitation.
What we see today is the rise of a “development mafia,” selling false dreams to people while looting the natural heritage of the region. A welfare state cannot treat the Himalayas as a cash machine. These mountains protect us, their rivers sustain us, and their ecosystems bring balance to life across India. Why then must we persist in drying up rivers, dumping garbage in them, blasting mountains for hydro projects, and burdening them with railway lines and mega-bridges? Why must millions of pilgrims, unmindful of their ecological footprint, be encouraged to overwhelm already fragile ecosystems in the name of faith?
The devastation is not confined to the mountains. Punjab’s agricultural lands have been inundated, displacing millions and destroying livelihoods. Overflowing dams have only worsened the crisis, both in India and across the border in Pakistan. For too long, dams have been presented as symbols of progress, but their role in aggravating floods is undeniable. Why are dam gates opened only at the peak of crisis, multiplying destruction downstream? This deserves a serious investigation. Experts must assess whether artificial interventions like big and small dams have caused more damage than natural floods themselves. Evidence increasingly suggests this is the case.
It is time for state governments to face the truth: their people’s future cannot be secured by drilling tunnels, blasting mountains, or selling rivers to private players. Mainstream media may shy away from debating these uncomfortable realities, but citizens must continue to question this destructive model. The Himalayan states deserve development that serves their communities, not projects that enrich a handful of contractors, middlemen, and corporate cronies.
Too often, infrastructure contracts are handed out as political favors, with profits flowing to business houses from Gujarat and elsewhere, while local people are left with little more than environmental ruin. Such policies erode not only ecology but also the cultural and historical soul of the Himalayas. If democracy is to mean anything, decisions about the future of the mountains must be made in dialogue with the people who live there, not imposed from above.
The Himalayas are crying out. They demand respect, not exploitation. Unless we change course, the fury of nature will only grow stronger, and the cost of our collective greed will be unbearable.
---
*Human rights defender 

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.