Skip to main content

Why building stronger India requires consistent action, long-term commitment, not rhetoric

By Sudhansu R Das
 
Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, while delivering a lecture at the Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology (VNIT) in Nagpur, said that research centers, IITs, and engineering colleges should conduct research in line with the country’s needs. He added that sustained efforts in this direction could significantly enhance the growth rate of the Indian economy and strengthen its position globally.
Despite paying a high price for importing advanced technology, services, and weapon systems, India has not done enough to create the right environment for research and innovation. The Ministry of Education must build the capacity to effectively monitor engineering colleges and research centers across the country. Quality infrastructure, teaching standards, and research output should be ensured before granting institutions permission to operate.
Rajiv Prakash, Dean (Research & Development) at IIT Kanpur, has emphasized that Indian universities need to engage more foreign professors for teaching and interaction with students, which would help build stronger international academic connections. Government programs such as GIAN and SPARC provide opportunities for Indian students and teachers to collaborate with foreign universities and invite international faculty to India, but the scope remains limited. A long-term solution lies in making the teaching profession more attractive so that bright students choose it as a career. At the same time, the prevalence of rote learning in schools and colleges continues to hinder creativity. Unless rote learning is replaced with critical and applied learning, innovation will not take root.
India is currently the world’s second-largest arms importer, and until 2024 it ranked first. Between 2019 and 2023, it accounted for 9.8% of global arms imports. In 2024, India imported arms worth approximately $2.64 billion, according to the SIPRI Trend Indicator Value (TIV). Heavy dependence on imported arms makes the country vulnerable, as suppliers are aware of the type of weapons sold and may share such information with rival nations. To safeguard its security, India must develop the capability to produce advanced weapons, fighter aircraft, naval ships, armored vehicles, and drones domestically. Resources currently diverted to non-essential infrastructure projects should instead be invested in strengthening research and innovation.
BJP leaders often highlight India’s ancient achievements in science and technology, referring to advanced weapon systems such as the Brahmastra and to the architectural and engineering excellence seen in temples, palaces, and forts. In earlier times, rulers encouraged citizens to acquire knowledge and skills that contributed to such achievements. Indian historians have yet to conduct systematic scientific research into these traditions, and dismissing them without examination overlooks valuable historical insights.
References are also made to the Pushpak Viman, described in mythology as an aircraft defying gravity. While scientists in developed nations are working on anti-gravity research, in India the subject remains largely confined to debate. Accounts of Lord Rama’s 14 years of exile describe his exposure to India’s diverse cultures, economies, and knowledge systems, experiences that were said to contribute to the establishment of Ram Rajya.
India now faces the challenge of reviving an environment conducive to innovation. Each year, many talented graduates leave the country for higher education in Western nations, where they often choose to remain due to better career opportunities, remuneration, and job satisfaction. Good governance, transparent institutions, inclusive opportunities, ease of entrepreneurship, and prospects for professional growth are essential to attract such talent back to India.
The country also requires more centrally administered schools supported by dedicated teachers to ensure equitable and high-quality education. Schools should not operate solely on business principles, as the nation cannot afford to compromise on the education of future generations. Building a stronger India requires consistent action and long-term commitment rather than rhetoric.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.