Skip to main content

Like many extremist leaders, Sinwar 'did not seek' a peaceful Palestinian state alongside Israel

By Bhaskar Sur* 
The death of Yahya Sinwar, mastermind behind the October 7 massacre last year, came on October 16, after a life marked by violence and radicalism. Born in 1962 in a refugee camp, Sinwar harbored intense hatred towards Jews, which ultimately defined his actions and worldview. He masterminded the killing of 1,200 Israelis, and, like Hitler, envisioned a "Final Solution"—the destruction of Israel and a second Holocaust.
Sinwar’s early involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood, a militant Islamist organization, set the stage for his later leadership in Hamas, a group driven by the goal of erasing Israel. He was imprisoned in Israel for killing 12 Palestinians suspected of spying, and during his time in prison, he became fluent in Hebrew and a prolific reader, gaining cleverness but not wisdom. Upon his release in 2011 as part of a prisoner exchange, he quickly resumed militant activities, working with Hamas to develop military strategies.
Like many extremist leaders, Sinwar did not seek a peaceful Palestinian state alongside Israel. Instead, he envisioned the total conquest of "Mandate Palestine," from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, necessitating the eradication of Israel and its people. This ambition is not just impractical but disastrous, with Palestinians themselves likely to suffer the greatest consequences.
Western commentators, unfamiliar with Islamic traditions and the real goals of groups like Hamas, often misunderstand the situation. They focus on the desire for a Palestinian state, overlooking the fact that Arab states initially rejected the 1947 UN partition plan, which provided for such a state. For many Arabs, the existence of Israel is seen as an affront to Islam, making coexistence with the Jewish state unacceptable.
Over the years, as secular Arab leaders failed to destroy Israel, Islamist movements like Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran's Islamic Revolution filled the vacuum. Hamas, despite being a Sunni group, accepted aid from Shia Iran, joining the so-called Axis of Resistance—a coalition committed to Israel’s destruction.
The October 7 massacre was a calculated move to provoke Israel into a retaliatory strike, hoping that global outrage over civilian casualties would shift sentiment against Israel. For Hamas, high casualties among Palestinians serve a dual purpose: rallying support from the global liberal left while simultaneously framing those who die in jihad as martyrs destined for paradise.
Sinwar, like other extremist leaders, was driven by an ideology that prioritized the destruction of Israel above all else, indifferent to the suffering of his own people. He shares with figures like Pol Pot the brutal certainty of his convictions, showing no concern for the human cost of his dangerous ambitions. Those who support or sympathize with such figures, whether out of ideological blindness or self-deception, are similarly complicit in the tragic consequences.
---
Source: Author's Facebook timeline 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Sinwar was a hero. The jewish lies no longer work.

TRENDING

When nostalgia becomes a memory we never lived: The 80s AI trend

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan  The retro hair, vintage clothes and analogue grain are not the real attraction. The real fascination is that AI can now manufacture something technology has always struggled to reproduce: the tactile, imperfect feeling of memory.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Dolly Parton: From a mountain cabin to a library for the world

By Suresh Deman  Born in a one-room cabin in the Tennessee mountains, Dolly Parton turned poverty into poetry, heartbreak into song, and her father's inability to read into a programme that has given more than 300 million books to children. Her remarkable journey suggests that a life is measured not only by how far one travels, but by what one sends back *** Dolly Parton was born into poverty, but never into a poverty of imagination. She entered the world on 19 January 1946 in the mountains of East Tennessee, the fourth of twelve children. The Parton family had little money and few of the comforts that much of America would eventually take for granted. Her father, Robert Lee Parton, farmed, built and laboured wherever work could be found. Her mother, Avie Lee, possessed a different kind of wealth. She filled the crowded home with Appalachian songs, stories, faith and the conviction that hardship need not extinguish beauty. Dolly's childhood poverty was not something later inven...