Skip to main content

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*
  
105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.
A truck displaying the slogan “For Nestlé, not all babies are equal” drove up Avenue Nestlé in Vevey on October 1 afternoon, accompanied by the fascinated looks of passers-by. It was carrying 40 m3 of empty boxes representing 10 million sugar cubes, the amount of added sugar contained in Cerelac baby products sold each day in low- and middle-income countries. 
Public Eye and its partners, the International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) and EKO are calling with this “return to sender” action on the food giant to end the outrageous double standard revealed by Public Eye's investigation  last April. A petition  signed by more than 105,000 people was also delivered to the company’s representatives.
Two of Nestlé’s best-selling baby food brands in low- and middle-income countries – Cerelac infant cereals and Nido growing-up milks – contain high levels of added sugar, while such Nestlé products have no added sugar in Switzerland. The company aggressively promotes these products as healthy and key to supporting young children’s development, in its main markets in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 
But exposure to sweetened foods early in life can create a life-long preference for sugary products, increasing the risk of developing obesity and numerous related health issues, such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease. This is why the World Health Organization bans the addition of sugar to baby food.
Investigation by Public Eye sparked a wave of indignation around the world and prompted Indian, Bangladeshi and Nigerian authorities to launch investigations, while calls for a boycott have increased on social networks. In June, Public Eye and IBFAN called on  the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs to end these unethical business practices, which also damage Switzerland’s reputation. 
To this day, Nestlé still hides behind compliance with current regulations. The multinational highlights its efforts to gradually reduce sugar in its products, as well as the introduction of alternatives with no added sugar in certain markets, as announced in India. However, these half-measures are inadequate and perpetuate a double standard with devastating consequences for public health. 
---

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Reclaiming the self: Feminist consciousness in three poetic traditions

By Ravi Ranjan   Savita Singh’s Main Kiski Aurat Hoon stands today as one of the most intellectually expansive works in contemporary Hindi poetry—a poem that begins with a seemingly simple question of women’s identity but unfolds into a profound meditation on selfhood, history, language, and human freedom. When read alongside Kishwar Naheed’s Hum Gunahgaar Auratein and Adrienne Rich’s Diving into the Wreck , Singh’s poem becomes part of a global feminist conversation that interrogates how identities are constructed, imposed, resisted, and ultimately re‑imagined.