Skip to main content

'Diversion of forest land': Why is govt scheme for wildlife habitats a cruel joke

By Shankar Sharma* 
In light of recent reports regarding the Centrally Sponsored Scheme for Integrated Development of Wildlife Habitats, it has been announced that the Ministry of Environment, Forestry, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has successfully met its 100-day target for enhancing wildlife habitats. While the media celebrates this milestone, and the Ministry may take pride in their achievement, environmental advocates across the country have reason to approach such claims with skepticism. 
The current state of our environment, particularly wildlife habitats, raises serious concerns about the overall health of the nation’s ecosystems. Over the past two to three decades, countless instances have surfaced where forest lands, including those in legally protected areas, have been allocated for non-forestry projects. 
Reports indicate that the National Wildlife Board approved approximately 500 projects in forests and protected areas from 2014 to 2018, resulting in the loss of about 120,000 hectares of primary forest in just five years. This raises questions about the commitment of the National Board for Wildlife and the MoEF&CC to safeguard our environment and wildlife habitats. 
According to a study by the World Resources Institute, the country lost 1.6 million hectares of tree cover and 16 million trees between 2001 and 2018, with a staggering 9.4 million trees cut down in the last four years alone. The country's remaining forests and natural resources, along with public health, are at critical risk. 
Over the past six years since July 2014, India has approved more than 270 projects in and around its most protected areas, including biodiversity hotspots and national parks, while simultaneously relaxing environmental protections. This interference threatens not only habitats and ecosystems but also poses a danger to public well-being. 
Data reveals that the MoEF&CC has granted environmental clearance for 87% (2,256 out of 2,592) of proposals submitted between July 2014 and April 2020. If this trend continues, it is likely that most of the nation’s original forests, which hold immense ecological significance, will be lost within a few decades. Legally protected areas (PAs) account for only about 14% of forested land and a mere 4.61% of the total land area in India. 
Even though there has been an increase in national parks and wildlife sanctuaries since 1970, the protection these areas receive is concerning. Surveys from the mid-1980s indicated that over 65% of PAs were characterized by human settlements and resource extraction, leading to further encroachment into pristine forested areas for non-forestry uses. 
Legally protected areas account for only about 14% of forested land and a mere 4.61% of the total land area in India
Recent policy decisions exemplifying this issue include the consideration of applications to divert vast tracts of untouched land in a Karnataka sanctuary for a pumped storage power plant and a proposal for uranium mining in a tiger reserve in Telangana. 
Despite decades of development efforts resulting in a drastic reduction of PAs to less than 5% of the land area, there remains a political perception that economic development is insufficient, prompting calls for further reductions in PAs. Such actions are unlikely to benefit local communities; rather, they will most likely lead to increased disasters related to biodiversity loss. 
Highlighting the urgency of these issues, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres recently stated that "the battle to secure the planet's future will be won or lost in the next 18 months." 
With only 21% of the country’s total land area covered by forests and tree cover, significantly short of the national policy target of 33%, the ongoing conversion of natural forest lands for various so-called development projects presents a grim reality for committed environmentalists. The celebration of routine milestones, such as the one associated with the Centrally Sponsored Scheme for Integrated Development of Wildlife Habitats, may seem like a cruel joke in this context. 
Ultimately, the true test of the Ministry’s commitment to wildlife habitat protection will be its response to calls from environmentalists in Karnataka, who are keenly awaiting a clear and lasting rejection of proposals to construct hydropower plants within three different wildlife sanctuaries that threaten to devastate thousands of acres of dense tropical forests. 
Additionally, over 20 linear project proposals in the Western Ghats, either within or adjacent to protected areas, seek to divert thousands of acres of natural forests, further underscoring the urgent need for comprehensive environmental safeguards. 
--- 
*Power & Climate Policy Analyst. This article reflects the author’s representation to the Union Minister for Environment, Forestry, and Climate Change, New Delhi, and the Vice Chairperson of NITI Aayog, New Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Information Commission issues warning against misinterpretation of RTI orders

By A Representative   The Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has issued a press note clarifying that its orders limiting the number of Right to Information (RTI) applications for certain individuals apply only to those specific applicants. The GIC has warned that it will take disciplinary action against any public officials who misinterpret these orders to deny information to other citizens. The press note, signed by GIC Secretary Jaideep Dwivedi, states that the Right to Information Act, 2005, is a powerful tool for promoting transparency and accountability in public administration. However, the commission has observed that some applicants are misusing the act by filing an excessive number of applications, which disproportionately consumes the time and resources of Public Information Officers (PIOs), First Appellate Authorities (FAAs), and the commission itself. This misuse can cause delays for genuine applicants seeking justice. In response to this issue, and in acc...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

'MGNREGA crisis deepening': NSM demands fair wages and end to digital exclusions

By A Representative   The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a coalition of independent unions of MGNREGA workers, has warned that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is facing a “severe crisis” due to persistent neglect and restrictive measures imposed by the Union Government.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

Job opportunities decreasing, wages remain low: Delhi construction workers' plight

By Bharat Dogra*   It was about 32 years back that a hut colony in posh Prashant Vihar area of Delhi was demolished. It was after a great struggle that the people evicted from here could get alternative plots that were not too far away from their earlier colony. Nirmana, an organization of construction workers, played an important role in helping the evicted people to get this alternative land. At that time it was a big relief to get this alternative land, even though the plots given to them were very small ones of 10X8 feet size. The people worked hard to construct new houses, often constructing two floors so that the family could be accommodated in the small plots. However a recent visit revealed that people are rather disheartened now by a number of adverse factors. They have not been given the proper allotment papers yet. There is still no sewer system here. They have to use public toilets constructed some distance away which can sometimes be quite messy. There is still no...

Rally in Patna: Non-farmer bodies to highlight plight of agriculture in Eastern India ahead of march to Parliament

P Sainath By  A  Representative Ahead of the march to Parliament on November 29-30, 2018, organized by over 210 farmer and agricultural worker organisations of the country demanding a 21-day special session of Parliament to deliberate on remedial measures for safeguarding the interest of farm, farmers and agricultural workers, a mass rally been organized for November 23, Gandhi Sangrahalaya (Gandhi Museum), Gandhi Maidan, Patna. Say the organizers, the Eastern region merits special attention, because, while crisis of farmers and agricultural workers in Western, Southern and Northern India has received some attention in the media and central legislature, the plight of those in the Eastern region of the country (Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Eastern UP) has remained on the margins. To be addressed by P Sainath, founder of People’s Archive of Rural India (PARI), a statement issued ahead of the rally says, the Eastern India was the most prosperous regi...

India's health workers have no legal right for their protection, regrets NGO network

Counterview Desk In a letter to Union labour and employment minister Santosh Gangwar, the civil rights group Occupational and Environmental Health Network of India (OEHNI), writing against the backdrop of strike by Bhabha hospital heath care workers, has insisted that they should be given “clear legal right for their protection”.