Skip to main content

A significant event that has revitalized fundamental right of freedom of expression for journalists

By Vikas Meshram* 

The recent remark made by the Supreme Court -- that cases can’t be lodged against journalists for criticising Government -- is a significant event that has revitalized the fundamental rights of freedom of expression for journalists. The core of journalism in a democracy is to examine the policies, plans, and governance of the government and present the truth to the public. For this purpose, it is necessary for journalists to have the right to criticize fearlessly. 
However, in recent years, journalists in various states, particularly those who have criticized the decisions or policies of the ruling political parties, have often faced political persecution. In this context, the Supreme Court's stance has emerged as a ray of hope. It has reflected the true essence of democracy by asserting that journalists have the right to criticize the policies and decisions of the government. The Supreme Court has shown the mirror to those in power.
This statement has provided relief to journalists who have faced repression for raising their voices against various political parties in power. In many states, journalists have been arrested, assaulted, and subjected to serious charges, and there are occasional reports of journalists falling prey to suspicious circumstances. The recent Supreme Court comment offers hope to those fearless journalists who have fallen victim to political persecution. The coming days will reveal how much the government changes its policies in light of the court’s remarks. 
In fact, this comment was made during the hearing of a case filed against a journalist in Uttar Pradesh. In this way, the Supreme Court has shown a mirror to those in power who do not tolerate criticism and become aggressive against the media. After independence, even prominent politicians of the country used to take media criticism of any policy or decision in stride. 
Opposition MPs in Parliament would generally demand open discussions, holding up copies of newspapers. It is in this context that the Supreme Court, during its recent comment, reminded us of the relevant article in the Constitution concerning freedom of expression. In this way, the court has empowered journalists who raise their voices against the oppressive actions of the government.
It is ironic that the rulers in many states have shown disdain for criticism, cartoons, and comments on social media. Filing cases, arresting people, and imprisoning them have also come to light. The tolerance for criticism, which is an essential requirement for a prosperous democratic tradition, seems to be missing in today’s politicians. It has been observed in recent times that after any criticism, politicians become aggressive. 
In some cases, journalists are charged under the sections of law used against anti-national elements. Cases have even been filed under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, crossing all boundaries. In such cases, it becomes difficult for journalists to obtain bail. Clearly, such actions are taken out of prejudice. In recent years, the Supreme Court has made it clear in broad terms that criticizing the government cannot be considered sedition. 
Yet, authoritarian rulers are not deterred by such rulings. This tendency has persisted for centuries – governments consider those who expose what they want to keep hidden from the public as their enemies. Then, through any means necessary, they attempt to silence those voices. Gradually, governments have started adopting a zero-tolerance policy toward criticism. In fact, people in power are always afraid of being exposed.
Criticizing or questioning various government schemes or policies is the ethical responsibility of the media
The tradition of accepting criticism is present in cultured societies and vigilant democracies around the world. In this way, the healthy democratic traditions, social development, and progress of a country are assessed. It is good that the judiciary continues to strengthen the freedom of expression from time to time. However, we must remember that even after seven decades of independence, we have not been able to make the common people of the country aware of their right to unbiased information.
As a result, they are not seen standing up to defend fearless journalists when they try to expose the truth. They don’t care that those in power are trying to hide certain truths related to their interests. Politicians always want to spread whatever fame they desire but hide the truth. This Supreme Court comment is sending a positive message to society that criticizing the government’s performance is not a crime but a part of democracy.
The role of the media is not just to be a source of information in a democracy, but to protect people’s rights as well. If journalists attempt to seek the truth and criticize the government's wrong policies, they must be protected. If those in power put pressure on the media, the public’s trust is diminished, and the overall freedom of thought in society is threatened. 
Criticizing or questioning various government schemes or policies is the ethical responsibility of the media. If the media abandons this responsibility, there is a possibility that the fourth pillar of democracy may collapse. Therefore, it is essential for journalists to move forward with courage in their work, and the government must also accept the responsibility of providing adequate assistance and protection to them. Media freedom is crucial for democracy, and it requires all systems to come together to preserve it.
In this entire context, the comment made by the Supreme Court is extremely welcome. This comment is, in a way, a protective shield for the media, allowing journalists to perform their duties fearlessly. The court has shown those in power the errors in their ways and emphasized the importance of journalists' rights. This decision has provided a new direction to the fight against the injustice faced by journalists, and the path to securing their fundamental rights is now clear. There is no doubt that a vigilant and fearless journalist, by playing the role of a strong opposition, shows the way to those in power.
---
*Social activist

Comments

TRENDING

Campaign group urges INDIA alliance to release Jharkhand manifesto to counter BJP’s 'divisive' agenda

By Our Representative  The Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan, an advocacy group, has issued a press release urging the INDIA alliance to release a Jharkhand-specific manifesto to counter the BJP’s "divisive" electoral agenda. With just two weeks remaining before the assembly elections, the INDIA coalition has yet to announce its plans and priorities for the state. Meanwhile, the BJP's campaign, according to the press release, is centered around communalism, divisiveness, and distraction from Jharkhand's core issues.

Tributes paid to pioneer of Naxalism in Punjab, who 'dodged' police for 60 yrs

By Harsh Thakor*  Jagjit Singh Sohal, known as Comrade Sharma, a pioneer of Naxalism in Punjab, passed away on October 20 at the age of 96. Committed to the Naxalite cause and a prominent Maoist leader, Sohal, who succeeded Charu Majumdar, played hide and seek with the police for almost six decades. He was cremated in Patiala.

Israel's 'war crime': 18,000 children died not just from bomb explosions but also starvation

By Sandeep Pandey*  Last year 6 years old Madiha was a guest during Diwali at our home in Lucknow. Listening to the sound of fire crackers bursting outside she remarked, ‘It appears as if we’re in Gaza.’ She has probably no idea of the extent of damage and loss of life that has taken place in Palestine but can relate to sound of crackers as bombs exploding over Gaza.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Left victory in Sri Lanka deliver economic sovereignty plan, go beyond 'tired' IMF agenda?

By Atul Chandra, Vijay Prashad*  On September 22, 2024, the Sri Lankan election authority announced that Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) alliance won the presidential election. Dissanayake, who has been the leader of the left-wing JVP since 2014, defeated 37 other candidates, including the incumbent president Ranil Wickremesinghe of the United National Party (UNP) and his closest challenger Sajith Premadasa of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya. 

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah  The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How pseudo-liberals 'went wrong' in judging DY Chandrachud as Chief Justice India

By Shamsul Islam*  DY Chandrachud took charge as Chief Justice of the Indian Supreme Court (SC) on November 09, 2022. On this occasion many of the pseudo-liberals who claimed to be defenders of the democratic-secular polity of India manifested great happiness. They declared that the time of SC being an appendage of the RSS-BJP government headed by PM Modi was over as Justice Chandrachud was a liberal judge committed to the democratic-secular polity of India. 

In the pantheon of Indian cricket, VVS Laxman as symbol of elegance, resilience, unselfish brilliance

By Harsh Thakor*  On November 1st, legendary Indian cricketer VVS Laxman celebrates his 50th birthday. Known for his elegance, Laxman turned impossible matches on their heads with a style that captivated cricket fans worldwide. He wielded his bat like an artist’s brush, finding gaps on the field with surgical precision, creating innings as meticulously as a sculptor carves a masterpiece. Born in Hyderabad, Laxman inherited the stylistic lineage of local icons ML Jaisimha and Mohammad Azharuddin, blending it with a grace reminiscent of Gundappa Viswanath.