Skip to main content

Indian civil society groups demand closure of World Bank and IMF on 80th anniversary

By A Representative 
A coalition of nearly 200 civil society organizations, including grassroots movements and social campaigns, has issued a call for the closure of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on their 80th anniversary. These groups are advocating for the establishment of a new, democratic, and decentralized global financial system that prioritizes sustainability and equality.
In a strongly worded statement, the groups criticized the Bretton Woods institutions for perpetuating a development model that reinforces global inequalities. They argue that for the past eight decades, the World Bank and IMF have enabled a continuous transfer of wealth from the Global South to the Global North. Their policies, rooted in a colonial logic of extraction and exploitation, have left many countries mired in debt and stripped of control over their natural resources.
The statement highlights how the policies of the World Bank and IMF have resulted in the privatization of vital public services such as water, electricity, education, and healthcare, along with cuts to welfare programs and food subsidies. These actions, the groups claim, have disproportionately harmed marginalized communities, including rural and urban working classes, small-scale farmers, women, and indigenous peoples, contributing to widespread poverty and food insecurity.
The civil society groups argue that these institutions, despite their harmful impact on the environment and societies, have remained immune to accountability. They claim that the governance structures and market-driven policies of the World Bank and IMF are beyond reform and call for their complete shutdown.
The groups demand the creation of new global institutions that operate on principles of democratic governance, economic equality, and environmental sustainability. These institutions, they say, should represent the needs of all nations, rather than serving the interests of a select few in the Global North.

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

When Sardar Patel opposed reservation, asked Scheduled Castes to give up their “inferiority” complex

Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel By Dr Hari Desai* It is ironical indeed. Though Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was opposed to any kind of reservation in the government jobs and education as well as in the legislatures (like Mahatma Gandhi), even today his name is being drawn in controversies in the present-day agitations demanding reservation in India.

Activists Akriti, Satyam Verma face NSA in Noida protest case: PUCL

By A Representative   Human rights activist Kavita Shrivastava has alleged that the Uttar Pradesh Police is invoking the National Security Act (NSA) against two activists associated with Mazdoor Bigul in connection with the Noida workers’ protest case, even as labour unrest continues to spread across industrial belts in several northern states.